250 News - Your News, Your Views, Now

October 28, 2017 8:01 am

Simpson Strives to Become Sustainability Mayor

Sunday, October 12, 2014 @ 9:26 AM

Quesnel, B.C. – The idea of running to become mayor of Quesnel was first planted in Bob Simpson’s head on May 14, 2013.

It was the night he lost his Cariboo-North seat to Liberal Coralee Oakes in the BC provincial election – and it was a notion he initially dismissed.

“People approached me that evening saying now that you’ve got some free time why don’t you consider running for mayor? And I rebuffed that.”

But not long after he says something happened in the forest sector that helped change his mind.

Bob Simpson

Bob Simpson – photo submitted

“The way that the mayor (Mary Sjostrom) reacted to the Canfor mill closure – her expression of shock and surprise – her comment that she was hoping that LNG would help save our community really shocked me.”

Simpson says there was no excuse for shock noting he’d been raising the issue of mill closures since 2005 and had tabled documents in the legislature warning that Quesnel was going to experience mill closures in about 18 months which sure enough happened.

“So there was no excuse for shock or surprise. And the real tragedy was no work had been done – no risk management scenarios run, no plans in place. That really upset and angered me.”

If elected, he says he”ll take a proactive approach to his job, which he says likely includes more turbulence in the forest sector.

“It’s not over yet. We haven’t even re-set the annual allowable cut. It’s going to come crashing down, most likely within the next couple of years. We’re going to experience more mill closures and job losses and the city and council has an obligation to plan for that.”

Simpson says if elected, he would spend his first year in office re-setting the city’s finances to plan for it.

“The City of Quesnel is far too dependent on its industrial tax base (64%). Only 19% on residential. Now that’s great for the residential rate payers as long as we have all those mills. The minute the mills start shutting down, residential rate payers are going to be shocked at how much of the tab they’re going to have to pick-up.”

He says a plan is needed to re-balance those taxes “so we’re not vulnerable to mill closures and to possible loss of services.”

Simpson says another of his goals will be to work with the community on what the options are to expand the city’s economic base out of forestry – something he says citizens shouldn’t be afraid of.

“We should not be afraid to embrace the challenge that is going to be coming at us. We should stop avoiding reality that we aren’t going to be going through a transition in our forest sector. Looking at history it’s when you actually say yes this crisis is upon us that human beings get the most creative.”

Comments

Imagine that: A Dipper who wants to raise taxes.

Maybe next time try actually reading the article before posting your crap.

Somebody with a unhealthy obsession with our current premier has nothing to say to me. Just for YOUR comprehension, I will break this down for you. In order to “balance” the tax collection, he proposes to raise the percentage of taxes collected from property owners. How is he going to do that, Sparky? Just think before posting.

When the industrial base evaporates the only ones left to pay taxes are homeowners and business.

Of course “re-setting” means raising their taxes in order to provide the services which citizens expect from the city.

So, he is for raising taxes, rather than attracting business. Typical Dipper dogma. Nothing new here, move along folks.

“When the industrial base evaporates the only ones left to pay taxes are homeowners and business.

Of course “re-setting” means raising their taxes in order to provide the services which citizens expect from the city.”

My point exactly.

As for your last post, Jimmy, since you seem to have the answers, how exactly does someone immediately bring in industrial businesses the size of the forest industry to take up the slack?

Tax breaks for all business hey “SPARKY”!

Industry will still have to pay taxes on the land they used for years or face cleaning the sites up for future use which would cost them billions. That is if the company doesn’t go into receivership which than would fall on us the tax payer.
Simpson if he is voted in will already be looking at land tax increases from the previous mayors decision to drain the slues on Quesnel west side. Also the development of the wildlife sanctuary will mostly come with a huge price tag attach to it.
No mention of Mount Polley, what is his approach to that disaster? Good luck Bob, you’ll need it!

Hey Jimmy, tell us how you feel about teachers.

“shakes head” Dragonmaster, you had to get him going!

Simpson, seems to have an idea about what’s in store for quesnel.And planning for the future not a bad plan, as for Mary. what has she done about two terms, what plans or frame work layed down for the future?? reacting to a problem is not leadership being proactive is planning for the future and that’s what Quesnel needs today.

Comments for this article are closed.