WorkSafe Safety Officer Puts Comments into Context
Prince George, B.C.- Darren Beattie admits he said the Lakeland mill was the dirtiest he had ever seen, when he visited the site on February 6th 2012, but the comments have to be placed in the right context.Beattie was an Occupational Safety Officer with WorkSafeBC, and had visited the Lakeland Mills on many occasions over a ten year period. He testified at the Coroner’s inquest into the deaths of Glenn Roche and Alan Little that Lakeland “was quite a clean mill in comparison with others in the industry. When I say it was the dirtiest I had seen, the thing I noticed was the light film on handrails and stuff, and that wasn’t normal for them.”
That February 6th visit was sparked by an anonymous call to the WorkSafe BC office from someone saying he was a worker at Lakeland and the amount of dust in the mill risked “turning the mill into the next Burns Lake sawmill”, a reference to the fatal explosion that had occurred about three weeks earlier at the Babine Forest products mill in Burns Lake.
While the call came in on Friday February 3rd, Beattie, and WorkSafe colleague Kim Hess, didn’t visit Lakeland until Monday morning. Previous testimony has pegged Mondays as the best and cleanest day at the mill because it was the first shift after the weekend cleanup.
Beattie said that visit did not result in any orders being written against Lakeland, as “We found the accumulation did not warrant a housekeeping order.” He also testified he was not aware of what the acceptable standard was for dust accumulation, and that while he was aware dust was “combustible” he was not aware that given the right conditions, it could also be explosive.
He said he had advised Lakeland to clean up the mill, but warned against using compressed air because it is not an effective cleaning method, can pose a health hazard by dispersing dust into the air, and could create a flammable situation.
Throughout the inquest, lawyers have used the word “combustible” as being synonymous with “explosive”. Beattie explained it this way; “Diesel fuel is combustible, gasoline is flammable” and that diesel would not ignite as easily as gas. He added that while he knew dust could burn and that it was possible for it to explode in a confined space such as a bag house, “Nobody had the knowledge that a complete facility could blow up.”
In looking forward, or examining the Lakeland tragedy and coming away with ‘lessons learned’ Beattie said there was probably a lot of “should have, could have, would have” thinking looking back at the incident, but added, ” Probably a lot of what should have been done, has been done.”
Comments
So basically he is twisting the truth.. How does it go from one of the dirtiest mills ever to.. A light dust on handrails. Shouldn’t he have said.. It was dirtier than usual.. That makes sense.. He is untrustworthy with his recollection and should be reassigned as he has no right doing the job he has.
P Val: This article left out some of the pieces that provided the context you think was missing. The Citizen article makes it clear Beattie indeed saying Lakeland was dirtier than usual.
From their article: Beattie agreed it was the dirtiest he had seen the mill in the 10 years he had inspected the facility, but Lakeland was “quite a clean mill in comparison to its industry counterparts.”
He is backtracking, trying to muddy the waters of the truth.
This is a farce, just like most inquests become. An inquest is supposed to get to the root cause, and ensure that it doesn’t happen again. This is a witch hunt with more purgury than 8 seasons of Matlock.
Comments for this article are closed.