Thieves, they have a license to rob you. For example, BC average is 18 cents higher than the next highest in Canada. Whoops, forgot, evacuees heading home and a long weekend coming up. Gotta love em.

Oh yeah, good picture, Petro Can always first to start ripping you off.

When the Williams lake evac order was lifted the price jumped and has been up and down since.

Simple, there is no need to support these crooks, gas is still 12 cents lower at Costco.

PETRO-CANADA Pierre Elliott Trudeau Rips Off- CANADA :)

Maybe they think this is a good way to attract tourists. Do as f-150 says. Do not support them.

Last year saw the 2 million EVs on the road world wide record broken . This year is well on the way to putting another 1 million added to the global fleet . Almost all the EV manufactures are ramping up production with new models with new battery chemistry for longer range . LA has ordered 90 more electric buses from BYD and New Flyer ( imagine that , electric buses built in canada ) . All of these factors will drive down the price of the fossils . It’s inevitable . It’s unstoppable . And it’s coming to a town near you where ever you live .

“Should electric cars become ubiquitous, electricity will be taxed to yield that revenue. Electricity cost would also be higher if some 95 percent of U.S. electricity were not generated by the cheapest methods – burning fossil fuels, hydro, and nuclear reaction. Should it originate from wind and solar, it would cost three to eight times more: a dime per km with wind, a quarter per km with solar.”

Gasoline vs. Electric Cars: Energy Usage and Cost
By Stanislav Jakuba — February 4, 2015
“Should electric cars become ubiquitous, electricity will be taxed to yield that revenue. Electricity cost would also be higher if some 95 percent of U.S. electricity were not generated by the cheapest methods – burning fossil fuels, hydro, and nuclear reaction. Should it originate from wind and solar, it would cost three-to-eight times more: a dime per km with wind, a quarter per km with solar.”

There are many variables that determine the relative economics of an economic petro-powered vehicle (Honda Civic) and an electric vehicle (Nissan Leaf).

While the Civic had a slight advantage a year ago with gasoline at $3.50 per gallon, the advantage for conventional vehicles has jumped with today’s lower pump prices. Also, should electricity for transportation be taxed at the level of gasoline and diesel, the economic gap would widen. This disadvantage of electricity would further widen to the extent that the grid is powered by wind and solar. The analysis follows.

Driving Distance

Let’s start the comparison by investigating the driving distance “on full battery or tank.” As with all vehicles, that distance is influenced by the driver’s skill, but with electric cars there is, in addition, the ambient temperature dependence; it impacts their driving range far more than cars with internal combustion engines. The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) published the average driving range of the Nissan Leaf models vs. temperature; the chart is redrawn below. [1]

It illustrates the variability often overlooked in judging the achievable battery range in, say, Texas vs. Wisconsin. Other conditions being equal, ambient temperature decrease alone can cut the range by some 45 km from the best 122 km. Already at the beginning of this treatise we can see that comparisons will be tricky.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined in its tests that the average Nissan Leaf consumed 19 kWh/100 km which is 0.68 megajoules per kilometre (MJ/km). That is the average record of several drivers. But it is not clear if that number includes also related effects, such as the self-draining from the battery when it is not in use, heating the passenger compartment in cold weather, and the influence of the speed of charging on the efficiency of charging.

This loss amounts to 5 percent at slow charging and up to 40 percent for the rapid one. The car electricity consumption should refer to the electricity flow from the “wall” outlet to the charger, not just from the battery to the motor and auxiliaries. We arbitrarily assume a 20 percent penalty for those three losses which then changes the number to 0.85 MJ/km. When considering the 33 percent efficiency in electricity generation from fossil fuels, the number grows to 2.5 MJ/km.

My Honda Civic, a bigger car than the Leaf and not designed for the extra low friction of electric and hybrid cars, has been getting 39 mls/gal which is 2.0 MJ/km. Gasoline refineries and distribution burn about 15 percent of the energy in the fossil fuel, a consideration that raises the number to 2.3 MJ/km. But since I drive in the style of a “driver who does not need brakes,” I looked up the dealer advertised numbers and found 36 mpg. That mileage brings the number to 2.5 MJ/km.

By coincidence those final numbers for both cars are exactly the same. Their closeness confirms the obvious: If the origin of the energy for powering either car is based on fossil fuels, the energy consumed per distance will not differ much.

The Leaf is heavier than the Civic due to, mainly, the battery. The difference is equivalent to carrying extra four husky men (400 kg) vs. the average 1/2 tank of gasoline (19 kg) in the Civic. Measurements by SAE, charted below, show the percentage increase in energy consumption due to the increased weight of road vehicles.

Source: Automotive Engineering, 2005 May issue, p. 87.

After the energy consumption comparison, let’s see how costly one unit of energy is in electricity vs. one in gasoline. This is harder yet because the cost of electrical energy varies greatly from region to region, far more than gasoline prices do, which makes generalization meaningless unless accompanied by a list the constraints involved.

Focusing on my region, the northeastern U.S., the residential rate is $0.10/kWh for generation and the same for delivery, or $0.20/kWh total. Thus the electricity costs $0.055/MJ. The cost per road distance is then 0.055 x 0.85 = $0.047/km. (Some analysts account for the generated kWh rather than the whole bill thus missing a half of the cost.)

Now to the Civic: At $3.50/gal price of gasoline (10 percent alcohol), generating a “dealer mileage” cost of $0.05/km.

Our conclusion thus far: both cars’ “mileage” cost is about the same. Should, however, gasoline prices remain low, as increasingly seems to be the case, the Civic will be proportionally cheaper to operate. A $1.75/gallon price means travelling twice as far per unit of energy that the Leaf would.

There are numerous items that may alter the price comparison. As said, the swing in either price depends on time and location, but the price swing with gasoline is greater and more frequent than with electricity. Within the gasoline price, some 30 percent of the cost goes to the federal, state and other taxes, while that percentage is near zero for electricity.

Should electric cars become ubiquitous, electricity will be taxed to yield that revenue. Electricity cost would also be higher if some 95 percent of U.S. electricity were not generated by the cheapest methods – burning fossil fuels, hydro, and nuclear reaction. Should it originate from wind and solar, it would cost three to eight times more: a dime per km with wind, a quarter per km with solar.

To finish the cost comparison, the dealer price for the Leaf is 20 percent higher than for the Civic, similar models, before subsidies.

After all this information, it is up to the reader to decide which car is better under his/her circumstances, including that those may change in time. No generally applicable guideline exists. The author hopes that it is apparent from the above.

As to the CO2 emissions, a recent piece in The Economist (December 20, 2014) , “Cleaner than What?,” concluded (italics added):

Overall, the research shows that electric cars are cleaner than those that rely on internal-combustion engines only if the power used to charge them is also clean. That is hardly a surprise, but the magnitude of the difference is. How green electric cars really are, then, will depend mainly on where they are driven. In France, which obtains more than half its power from nuclear stations, they look like a good bet. In China—which is keen on electric cars, but produces some 80% of its electricity from coal—rather less so.

Emissions from manufacturing electric cars must also account for batteries that are made from materials such as lithium, copper and refined silicon, which require much energy to be processed.

Electric cars are expected to need a replacement battery. Once the emissions from producing the second battery are added in, the total CO2 from producing an electric car rises. Disposal also doubles the emissions because of the energy consumed in recovering and recycling metals in the battery.

Grid Electricity Demand

As a side issue related to the electrification of the U.S., it may interest you that should all the cars (200 million of them) be the electric Leafs, and driven as today for 15 000 km annually, their charging would draw some 80 billion watts based on the earlier MJ/km number. Of course, not everybody will be satisfied driving a small car so the overall consumption will be higher, say 100 GW.

To put that number into perspective, the present electricity consumption of the whole country amounts to 450 GW. [2] That wattage powers everything, from toasters and air conditioners to factories, hospitals and cities. Adding that new generating and grid capacity any time soon is of concern when considering that the present level was being developed since the time of Edison.

Notice also that this need for additional electricity does not include other road vehicles such as vans, busses and trucks, and that it assumes for the charging to be spread over 24 hours discounting commuters all plugging in past rush-hours.

Regarding the assumption that renewables become the predominant energy source, consider that the amount of electricity flow from wind, solar, and geothermal reached only 22 GW after 40 years of subsidized building of those three sources (hydro and wood has existed longer than that and have been stagnant or declining; other renewables contribute insignificant amounts).

Conclusion

Electric cars offer no savings in energy, money, or emissions at present. Electricity supply from renewables cannot cover but an insignificant portion of road vehicles. The numerical values in this article allow easy updates as conditions change in the future.

A Personal Note

Writing this, it was not my intention to promote or condemn electrical cars. Personally, I thought that electrical vehicles, in cities for deliveries, airport shuttling, etc., would commonly free those places of the incessant noise and air pollution from gasoline and diesel vehicles.

I based these thoughts on the belief that “green” nuclear-made electricity would have been abundant and cheap today. We had it available in the U.S. since 1950s.

Instead, we are burning precious hydrocarbons that are needed where no alternatives exist such as in the making of medicines, plastics and steel. I drove electrical delivery vehicles in summer jobs and have been involved with production of non-polluting vehicles such as the battery or the fuel-cell powered electrical cars and steam cars for decades. That research was focused on ordinary passenger cars rather than on the above mentioned short-haul vehicles.

Interestingly, those misguided projects were supported by Government grants. Today, millions of people are still tormented daily waiting at airport terminals and living in inner cities amid unnecessary noise and air pollution. In this respect, the Tesla car is an example of misappropriated funds for it cannot alleviate the traffic nuisance problems to any measurable degree.

So if electric cars cause higher taxation on electricity, shouldn’t the increase of our other electrical needs be added on to the cost of the car. So all the folks that claim a 10% increase in hydro causes more child poverty should be concerned about the additional 40% taxation that will come along with the EC revolution

Years ago, back in the mid 80’s, I ran a duel fuel truck, gas/propane!

Propane was dirt cheap, sometimes as low 7 cents per litre!

As more people converted to propane powered vehicles, Government eventually recognized that there was no road tax on propane, unlike the taxes on gas and diesel. So, next thing you know, the cost of propane rose to reflect taxation on it!

As seamutt’s post noted, don’t be surprised when such a charge is added to the cost of electricity!