Clear Full Forecast

No Extension for Columbus Demolition

By 250 News

Monday, September 15, 2008 08:23 PM

 
Debris stretches  out into the parking lot behind the  Columbus Hotel.
Prince George, B.C. – There won't  be any extension to the  demand that the Columbus hotel be demolished.
The owner of the burned out hotel  has made his first public comments since the  fire ravaged the buidling and took three lives. Rob Gibson told a special meeting of Council this evening that he agreed, the building is a hazard,  but the  problem is people think he hasn't been doing anything since the deadly fire.  "We have been working with  the insurance company and we are waiting for  the engineer's report.  I was told I would get it last Friday,and now  I am being told I will get it tomorrow.  The insurance company wants three estimates before it   will award the demolition contract and I can't get those estimates  without the engineer's report."
Gibson told Council the real problem is that the foundation of the building is  also the wall of the  Generator on the East,  and the H and R Block building on the west side.  There is a real  concern that  pulling down the two cement walls to ground level will  result in the  basement walls of the two neighbours sloughing in. 
That is a real concern says the City's  engineer, Fergus Foley, who  recommended the  building be taken down immediately.  He also told Council  he confirmed his initial suspicion about the  danger of the building, and while he believes there is a real fault in the  concrete walls,  the site is too dangerous to  get close enough to confirm those concerns.  Foley told Council the  third floor is  only  suspended by  roof joists, and  there are some sections that are only being held up by debris "Sooner or later something is going to shift" says Foley. 
Councillor Glen Scott wanted to give the owner two extra weeks, that was rejected by his Council colleagues.  Councillor Don Zurowski  suggested a 7 day extension and that too was  rejected.   Even though the site is under 24 hour security watch,  that wasn't enough to  swing Councillor Brian Skakun towards  granting an extension "I am not here to negotiate public safety."  The Mayor was on the same page saying this was a safety issue,and he didn't think there was any insurance  company that would argue with that, "I think we should move forward and we can all sleep with ease."
(at right, three white hand made crosses sit in the three wall shell of the Columbus Hotel, marking the fact that three men died as a result of the hotel fire. photo Opinion250 staff)
 
 Earlier today, samples were taken from the site to check for asbestos. Given the age of the building it is quite possible there will be some asbestos which means the demolition will require dust supression.  The City has already issued a tender for the demolition of the Hotel  and has five bids.  All  five  applicants have experience dealing with  asbestos removal.   The tender could be awarded asearly as the 17th.
at left, a pile of debris sits in the parking lot behind the  remains of the Columbus Hotel.
So with no extension,  the process of removing the debris and demolishing the remaining  walls will start Wednesday.  If the owner hasn't started the work by then,  the City will award the tender, and the cost will be added to the taxes owed the City.
 

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I wonder where the side walls sit in relation to the property lines. Whose walls are they? Are they party walls? If so, is there a party wall agreement?
Considering the owner has not payed the taxes and utility fees for over three years, the Columbus Hotel lands will become the city in a week or so. Therefore, Rob Gibson will not pay a cent of the cost of demolition (unless he really cares and pays up what he is due)
Well, looks like Glen and Don are like Jelly Donuts, Kind a soft in the middle, willing to grant extra time. I am on the right side of the political scale, but way to go Brian.
Soft in the middle? They have brains this time! The business owner needs time to get his quotes. The city has already taken over by getting their own bids. Seems to me the city council is in too much of a hurry. Safety my eye...they have already mitigated this issue with 24hr security. Talk about impatience by the city. Another week or two is no big deal. Look at NCP. How about the other burned out buildings? Potholes...guess it just depends on the pet project of the day.
Rob Gibson: I suggest you carry on working with the insurance company. Seems to me you also shouldn't be railroaded into this...see a lawyer!
You have it right Tiny. To me it looks like there is something else behind demolishing quickly other than "public" safety. If there is a concern that pulling down the two walls to ground level will result in the basement walls of the two neighbours sloughing in, why would that not be considered "public" safety?
Isn't it about time the building at 2nd & Quebec went away, too?
"The Mayor was on the same page saying this was a safety issue,and he didn't think there was any insurance company that would argue with that,"

Judging by this statement, I highly doubt our Mayor has ever had to deal with insurance companies or submit a claim. That just seems like a ridiculous statement. Most everyone knows how long it takes to get anything accomplished and all of the red tape involved when dealing with insurance claims.

I am a bit confused though: The city's engineer states it is a matter of public safety. Is this the same engineer's report Mr. Gibson is waiting for, or is he awaiting an independent report? If he is awaiting a report from the city's engineer, where the heck is it? If he is waiting for a report from an independent source, why wouldn't the council allow him an extra day to obtain it? Perhaps the independent report may have a differing opinion.

Not even any consideration or acknowledgment that this could potentially cause damage to the adjoining buildings seems to be rather harsh as well - way to take care of our downtown merchants!

It really seems like the city really wants to get its hands on this property...
I am scratching my head in amazement...
so much for revitalization....All I can see is just another charred hole in the ground for a long time to come.
A lot like the B&B Music crater....
Maybe hire a set director and builders from Hollywood to build a fake front to fill in this space. Maybe Star Trek or western like. Maybe a replica like the Alamo. Yer only limited by yer imagination. After all the burnt out buildings downtown have all these fronts, pull them all down then revitalize.
hey....isn't the owner entitled to a.....study???