Clear Full Forecast

Chaos in financial sector – Who will pay?

By Peter Ewart

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 03:50 AM

By Peter Ewart
 
The evidence is there for anyone to see. The U.S. financial sector is in the midst of what could be shaping up to be an unprecedented meltdown with the collapse of Wall Street investment bank Lehman Brothers, the forced bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac, and the impending bankruptcy of several other venerable American financial institutions such as Washington Mutual, IAG investment, and others.
 
A year ago I wrote an article that was published in Opinion250 entitled “Invasion of the Moneylenders – Part 7 – To shoot a moose.” In that article, which was part of a series of seven - I used the analogy of a wounded moose to describe the state of the financial sector in the U.S. at that time. A gut shot moose will sometimes “charge off into the brush at full clip or even resume feeding on shrubs as if nothing has happened.” So has gone the U.S. financial sector since that article was published. But now, a year later, the moose are starting to “drop.”
 
We are in a financial crisis that is rapidly spreading to other sectors of the world economy. The critical question arises: Who is going to end up paying for this disaster?
 
There is no doubt who caused it. U.S. investment banks and other financial institutions were right at the center of a host of financial schemes that some have described as little better than “legalized” fraud and swindling, ranging from bad mortgages to the packaging of toxic securities. Tangled into this mess were a witch’s brew of government and private regulators, non-banking corporations, brokers, politicians and others, who all played their part in what may prove to be one of the greatest and costliest scandals of all time.
 
It is hard to believe, but, as the Miami Herald newspaper has recently reported, in the state of Florida, at the height of the housing boom, thousands of ex-convicts were actually recruited into the financial services sector, resulting in nearly $85 million worth of outright mortgage fraud, as well as numerous other crimes related to stolen credit cards, identity theft and so on.
 
But these ex-convicts were small potatoes compared to the Wall Street financial institutions that pulled in hundreds of billions of dollars year after year from their highly questionable activities, and whose CEO’s have walked away with hundreds of millions of dollars stuffed in their pockets.
 
Now, as a result of this unparalleled greed, the entire U.S. (and possibly world) financial “house” is threatening to tumble down. 
 
And who ends up picking up the bill? Well, the financial elite, in league with their political friends, has already decided that one. They want the American taxpayer and taxpayers around the world to bail them out. They want governments, pension funds, workers, businesses, professionals, as well as other sectors of industry to suck up the losses that these same financial institutions have caused. They also want their own employees, as well as lower level brokers and others in the financial services sector, to accept tens of thousands of layoffs, as well as dashed hopes and ruined careers.
 
So far, the financial elite appears to be getting much of what it wants, the government bailout of mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae being the most recent example.  
 
But more financial chaos looms. In this economically dangerous environment, people in the U.S. and around the world need to think about just what kind of banking and financial services sector do they want, and put forward concrete proposals. Should the CEO’s and investment banks be allowed to walk away scot-free from the mess they have created? Should financial institutions be allowed to act like pirates and have little or no accountability to the people of the country or countries they are supposed to serve?
 
As the crisis spreads around the world, people also need to be vigilant about any so-called “emergency measures” proposed by government that are nothing more than bailouts for irresponsible financial institutions and that will saddle taxpayers with debt for years to come. As that old American saying goes: “Those who do the crime, should do the time.”
 
 
Peter Ewart is a writer and college instructor based in Prince George, British Columbia. He can be reached at: peter.ewart@shaw.ca
 

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Very good article Peter. I think we are just in the early stages of this debacle. Everything is fraction from the money when it is printed to the ownership rights of equity... and so the margin call is like a deck of cards that will go like dominoes through the whole system.

The current financial system is designed to facilitate fraud at all levels with no transparency for the vast majority of transactions taking place today through the derivative futures markets, and as such no ones knows which sector will be the next domino to fall. The risk is everywhere... because the security against risk is nowhere... because corporate interests have dismantled all the regulatory checks and balances to how the financial sector does business.

IMO the system is in the process of collapse because it was not a system governed by the laws of nature... but rather the laws of short term greed. Already you hear the calls for an interest rate cut to devalue the dollar savings in the hope that the added liquidity will buy some more time before reckoning. I agree that those that do the crime should do the time and that would be the quickest and cleanest way of getting through this... then to ensure it doesn't happen again a new system will have to be created that has regulatory protection over the value of the dollar as the core foundation of the financial system, rather than the fake growth formulas used today to justify a corrupt policy.

AIMHO
Im not so much for the sky is falling attitude.. When there are cracks in the eoconomy like this its a great time to jump into the markets especially if your going to pick up some resource investments. Money is just a game! Happy investing,
Well put, Peter, and a thoughtful response from you, Eag. I heard on the CBC news that the yanks are meeting today to discuss lowering their prime interest rate. As Eagle suggests, that would be a short term measure, and the greedy ones will just have more time to protect their own nests before the shite really hits the fan. The greed of relatively few people has brought about the eventual tumbling of this house of cards. A great many ordinary people will suffer, while the few will not see any consequence to their actions. I agree with the sentiment that those who are guilty should pay the price, so to speak.
metalman.
Likely it will be 're-regulated' in many areas where it was previously 'de-regulated'.

Some will "do the time", where there is sufficient evidence to secure convictions for some of the "crime" that undoubtedly has occurred.

That will, as it has done previously several times since the days of FDR and the Great Depression, defuse much public ire, and, more importantly, deflect the public's attention away from the real "cause" of the problem, and negate necessary moves to correct it.

Unwittingly, the greatest ally those who favour a "back to business as usual, even with 're-regulation' there's still 'money' to be made" approach, will have, will be the 'monetary reformers'.

Those well-intentioned, but hopelessly deluded poor souls who are going to start singing their ridiculous refrain that "the government should create ALL money." And "spend it into circulation", on financing public works, infrastructure, and other 'employment creating' activities. They play right into the hands of the 'Conspiracy' they so often finger as the ultimate evil in our modern world. Without even knowing it.

While they're busying themselves trying to pin-point the "Conspirators", they're missing the whole point of what ANY system of 'money' really is, and how it might be better made to do what it's supposed to do, but presently doesn't.
steal bread....go to jail

steal millions...get bought out

Better an ending with chaos than chaos without an ending.

The ship is sinking.
I never thought I'd be glad for Canada's tightwad, old-school lending institutions. Sure they may be making billions in profits off the average homeowner, credit card consumer, etc. But at least they have a successful, stable, long-term way of bilking us out of our money.
Can't wait fer the value of my house to go down so I can pay less taxes. If I sell, I just have to buy again somewhere else, probably more expensive. The taxes will go down, won't they? He asked sounding like a sucker and a rube.
The biggest problem with Canada's "tightwad, old school lending institutions" ISN'T the 'profits' they make, but what they do with them.

A far greater percentage of those profits should be paid out to their shareholders as dividends. And to their depositors, as interest on their deposits.

Instead, far too much of the take disappears into hidden reserves. Which are not necessary for any other reason than it creates a demand for more loans to make up the deficiency of purchasing power this policy creates.

One that would be alleviated greatly by the Banks distributing more of their profits back into the general community as dividends and interest.

This money has already appeared in the 'costs', and therefore the 'prices', of goods or services for sale in the overall economy.

Keeping much too much of what's collected undistributed is something which keeps the public coming back to the Banks for more loans to allow those 'prices' to be more fully met, and to enable the 'costs' that created them to be liquidated. That's ONE of the things that's wrong with our banking system as it's presently operating.
I doubt you're going to see too much 'chaos', Diplomat. The 'doom and gloom' crowd will be predicting the end of the world, just as they've done with the onset of every other economic contraction that's come along since the end of WW II. It hasn't come to pass, yet, though they're all so certain "this one will be different". This is "the big one". 1929 all over again.

Reminds me of that story of the rather poorly educated immigrant that opened up a hamburger stand. He had a family recipe for a certain relish that made his burgers tastier than anyone else's, he picked a good location, and his food was in constant demand. Every day he was open, which was six days out of the seven, he did a booming business.

It was kind of a "seat-of-the pants" operation, though. He didn't really know much about bookkeeping, or anything like that. He just got into a sort of feel for the number of buns and hamburger patties he was going to sell, how many tomatoes and onions and other ingredients he'd need, and that's what he ordered.

At the end of every day, sure enough he'd sold enough burgers to use up his entire stock. Day after day, week after week, year after year, after year.

His kids grew up watching their old man work, and though he was obviously successful and happy in his work, he always extolled them to "get an education", and be something more than a hamburger stand operator.

The oldest kid finally graduated high school and went on to college, his dad paying his way through. Wasn't much of a strain, the burger business was bringing in the bucks, as it always had, and he'd always been careful with his money.

The kid studied hard, and by and by graduated with a Masters degree in 'Economics'. Near the top of his class, he was truly a 'Master' at everything his profs had taught him. And boy, was his old man ever proud of him.

Out of college, the kid followed the world economic news with an eagle eye, analyzing every nuance the stock and commodity and real estate markets were showing, and applying all his new found knowledge at predicting trends. For that's what economists do, they predict. Like the weather man.

The news out of New York and London wasn't good. Everything pointed to hard times ahead, the financial markets were in turmoil. The kid unloaded his findings on his dad, telling him he'd better scale back on the buns, and patties, and all his other purchases ~ tough times were coming, and business would be bad.

Also, no sense staying open six days a week, cut back to a three or four day operation. That would save on hydro and natural gas.

His dad, knowing his kid was just about the smartest economist UBC had ever graduated, took his advice straight to heart. He halved his bun and patty order, told his customers he'd run out of stock and was closing early when they came after mid-day for a burger, closed down completely three days a week, and as sure as junior had predicted it, his business fell right off.

"My what a smart son I've got, " he told anyone who'd listen, "he predicted my business would be going down the drain, and just look how it has!"

As I look at my WWWBD bracelet (What Would Warren Buffet Do?), I am left to wonder, will I actually be able to retire (I'm almost 40 now) and live comfortably?

I own two properties, contribute to an RRSP account, and do my very best to save a portion of each cheque.

Are scarier times ahead?