Clear Full Forecast

Change The Way We Look After The Homeless, Start By Asking Someone With Knowledge

By Ben Meisner

Tuesday, October 28, 2008 03:45 AM

I was taken aback last week to find that the head of the BCGEU, Darryl Walker had never ever been approached for his input  on the homeless. Nor were the workers in the various hospitals that were disbanded in the early 80’s putting the people back onto the street.

Walker had worked as a health care worker and activity worker at the forensic Psychiatric institute and Riverview hospital since 1973. During that time one would assume that he had seen it all and any input he could give to correct the plight of the mentally challenged homeless people would be of great value .

One would assume that, but Walker has never been asked, nor has he sat on committees seeking a solution to the ever growing problem of mentally challenged on the streets.

If you also consider that Walker worked his way up through the ranks to become the head of the 60,000 strong BCGEU he would be someone who, at the very least, should be asked what he thought would fix the problem.

Well he hasn’tbeen asked  frightening as it may seem, from the days of Bill Vanderzalm who closed the facilities, tothe  NDP , and now the Liberals who control government .

Well let’s put his thoughts on record, because they belong there.  

Walker says there needs to be a several pronged program. Yes housing is important to him, but it must come only if we are prepared to provide supervision on a 24 hour basis, undertake to ensure that these people have a meaningful task that they must perform every day, so as to give them a sense of purpose, and it must not be for profit.

The head of the BCGEU then went on to say that we have entered into a service for profit in the handling of our mentally challenged and the results show it has been a failure. Profit he says has come at the expense of those in need. "I ‘m not against for profit work" he said, "in some cases it has worked out well, but the mental health area is one case where it doesn’t."

When you look around this city you can quickly see what he is talking about.  There are countless agencies all trying to cash in on the street people many who have social problems.  Many of those agencies are no more than agencies that while they operate as a society, provide full time work for a few people who head the agency. They don’t want to see their flock go elsewhere because  that means less funding and so the circle goes round and round with those in need watching from the outside.

Housing for the homeless is okay, but does it address the problems and the goals that Walker points out?  No.  So while we pour more money into various programs, (according to some as much as $53,000 dollars per homeless person per year) what is coming out of the end of the pipe is a growing service sector with fewer results.

Before we head down the road seeking answers from places such as Portland in the USA and from a former Premier, how about going back to the basics and asking a front liner his thoughts on how to fix the problem, or is that simply to easy?

I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s opinion.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Here is an idea - ask the homeless people...forget anyone else....
"ask the homeless people" Ask them what? What the solution to the homeless problem is? You really think that would get us the answers needed to help them?
Most of them are there due to mental health issues. For the most part anything they have to say is pointless.
How would asking them help?
Ask me and I will tell you we need to reopen all the institutions that our govt has closed over the years and put these people back where many of them belong.

Our govt doesn't like that idea because they prefer to have these people commiting property crimes against us and generally making our lives miserable instead of keeping them locked up where they belong.
In other words our govt's condone criminal activity.

Recently saw Celine Dion in Vancouver and was swarmed by homeless people with obvious mental health issues.
You couldn't get out of a taxi before there was a filthy stinking hand shoved in your face looking for handouts.
lostfaith - you really have lost faith. Your keen insight into how people feel is amazing..I am not saying we take what they say as golden but it would give an insight. In larger centres there are street level workers who keep their finger on the pulse with what is happening on the street. This information is then passed on to those who can do anything about it...I am not sure what "locking them up where they belong" does to solve anything. Why not just lock up everyone that does not fit in with your beliefs...oh wait a minute...didnt someone try that once before....
"locking them up where they belong" does a great deal to solve their problems. It is the start of the process to end the problems they deal with every day on the streets as well as getting them out of our justice system, (where they do not belong in the first place).

The reasons we have to deal with this issue in the first place is due to our govt refusing to deal with it using taxpayer dollars. Put them all out on the streets again and let the citizens have to deal with them. Completely wrong way to deal with it.

"Why not just lock up everyone that does not fit in with your beliefs...oh wait a minute...didnt someone try that once before...."
Why would you say that? No where did I say we should lockup everyone that does not fit in with my beliefs. Those are your words.
Sounds like you would prefer to have everyone with severe mental health issues running wild and free. You know, kind of like they already do.

My "keen insight" as you put, is dealing with the reality of the issue, not like your dream world "ask the homeless" scenario.
Lostfaith:"In other words our govt's condone criminal activity."

I presume that by govt's you meant plural, like in governments. During the NDP decade those who you want to be locked up were not locked up either and there were plenty of homeless downtown as well.

It's not a new problem. Whenever there is an election (federal or provincial/municipal) we get the same promises and talking heads endlessly promoting their *superior* plans and ideas and after things return to normal nothing much will have changed - the homeless are still homeless and roaming the streets somewhere.

"...didn't someone try that once before"?

Sure. During the Grand Inquisition of the Roman Catholic Church hundreds of thousands of human beings were arrested, tortured, quartered and burned at the stake just because they didn't fit in with their beliefs.
Yes, plural. ;)
There is sooo much to the homeless problem, but I get really irritated when someone says we can "end homelessness" We all know that we will never end homelessness. We can supply more and more and more places to live and more and more and more homeless people will come. We need to deal with root issues, I don't know what the answers are but I get angry when I see all that free housing provided by the govt while I drag my butt out of bed every morning and go to work so I can have a roof and meals - no one is buying me a house.

Remember whether it's provinical funding, federal funding or local govt funding - it's all TAX PAYER'S money, MY HARD EARNED MONEY! Gov't has no money of its own it's all tax payer's money and we should keep that in mind.
Your right Winnie we will never end homlessness but you need to remember that there are members of society that are wandering our streets that don't have the mental capacity to better themselves.
So we either lock them up or let them roam free like we do now. If they are locked up then this homelessness issue wouldn't be near what it is today.
The Gov's of this country released them onto the streets and they alone are to blame for it not the taxpayers.