Clear Full Forecast

Minister of Forests Says New Measures Protect Contractors and Plan for Future

By 250 News

Thursday, January 15, 2009 03:59 AM

Prince George, B.C.- Minister of Forests and Range, Pat Bell, says the Central Interior Logging Association was behind at least one of the measures to assist the forest industry announced by the Premier yesterday. “The CILA was really behind the push to have more financial protection for contractors.” That protection comes in the form of a new act that will allow contractors to put a lien against the logs they harvested for a company if they aren’t paid for their work. 
The other measures announced by the Premier are:
1.Extending Employment Insurance and Work-Sharing Program 
 
2. Stumpage pricing change for the Coast which Bell says follows the rules and limitations of the Softwood Lumber agreement “ We are able to adjust stumpage in a justifiable way.” Bell says the change can be justified because of the costs involved in everything from road construction to block preparation.
 
3. Tax exemptions for trust funds 
 
4. A Wood-First Policy
a. Expand six-storey wood-frame construction.
b. Expand B.C. Wood-First Policy to a national strategy
 
5. A Commercial Forest Reserve: The Province will look at ways to establish selected areas of the land base where forestry has the priority both for harvesting and for growing new trees to secure forest jobs and investment. Bell also says this could create a third tier of land use in the province. “There are high value growing sites on the east edge of Prince George where were could see a forest generate in 40 years instead of 80. We should be using those high value sites to bring about a shorter growth rotation.”This will ensure harvested land remains protected as a forest asset and will not be set aside for other uses.
6. Increase access to fibre supply 
 
7. Bioenergy tenure and pricing. Bell says he is very excited about this as it will set the stage for the Ministry to set the length and price attached to tenure for bio energy. “Frankly the move to bioenergy production hasn’t been moving as quickly as we would have liked. I see bio energy as further diversifying the industry and potentially creating thousands of jobs which would develop huge benefits for the province. This will provide certainty for companies moving into the bioenergy sector.”
 
While there wasn’t anything specific to silviculture, Bell says just wait “I plan to unveil a very aggressive approach in the coming months.   Silviculture is part of the equation but it will not be status quo.”

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Increase access to fibre supply - so we can ship more raw logs to China and the States. A great leap forward would be if Mr. Bell developed some nads like they have back on the "Rock"
Obviously there's a reason for timber exports, maybe if mills (I'm assuming we're talking coastal BC now, since that's where this debate is focused) were more efficient and competitive then it would be worthwhile to process logs domestically.

I think these are good initiatives. BC forestry needs some overhauling on all sides, and this is as good a place to start as any.
Swingline writes..."Obviously there's a reason for timber exports"

Yup and it's called corporate greed.
Ever hear of it?
Sorry Mr. Bell, but I feel we need a balanced approach to forest management. Big monocultures of pine helped get us into some of the mess we are in. Cut down spruce and plant pine because they have a shorter turn around time.
Lost Faith- it is called Fair market access- on private lands the owner should be able to sell their trees (no owned by the public) to any one they wish- If the local mills are not competive- tough luck
Lost faith= no comment
Dogs- at least one left wing union site has now direct a entire article re my posts on the forest industry = I am hate this union crap= try any thing else - assholes.
Yes, dogs, they should be able to do that on 'private' land. But they should also NOT be able to 'waste' a large part of that tree by pushing it up in burn piles and torching it, and then go onto their 'public' land tenures and cut more timber of higher value to make up their total annual allowable cut.

Go and look at the burn piles where Timberwaste has logged, there's butts and tops galore in them that all could be processed into lumber and chips if they were accessible to smaller mills at reasonable cost.

And please don't go on about how our mills are all inefficient and too high cost because of overpaid workers, etc. If you're going to "export" jobs in sawmilling today to be 'globally competitive', what are you going to do tomorrow, when you find you're still not competitive on raw log exports? "Import" low wage workers to do the jobs in logging, too? Give your head a good shake, man! You won't hurt anything in it, because there isn't anything in it.

A large part of the reason our mills are no longer cost competititve is because of the actions of your good buddy and fellow "Liberal" Gordon Campbell. Who wants to 'carbon tax' us, and to have us pay 'world price' for our own resources like hydro, and negate any natural advantage our abundance of hydro-electric power has given us.

Do Californians pay 'world price' for the sunshine that gives them more than one crop a year of the agricultural products grown there? In a pig's eye they do. And there's no reason whatsoever we should either for what the same source of energy gives us.