Clear Full Forecast

Forestry Roundtable Releases Report

By 250 News

Monday, March 09, 2009 09:49 AM

Prince George, B.C.-  It has been  over a year in the works, and today, the Working Roundtable on Forestry released its report and recommendations for the future of the forest industry.

"All British Columbians benefit from a strong forest sector," said Forests and Range Minister Pat BellBell. "And this report reminds us of the tremendous forest-based opportunities that lie ahead. By setting a clear vision and priorities, everyone in our forest sector - industry, workers, communities and First Nations  - can work with common purpose to create new jobs and drive the B.C. forest economy for decades to come.

The Working Roundtable on Forestry's vision is for "a vibrant, sustainable, globally competitive forest industry that provides enormous benefits for current and future generations and for strong communities."  Many of the ideas  have been rolled out for implementation already "I always said I wasn't going to wait  for the final report" says Minister Bell, "I saw some good ideas which could be implemented right away and we have done that".  One of those ideas is the "wood first" policy which  was announced in the most recent Throne Speech.

The Roundtable Report issued 29  recommendations: 

  1. We should continue to inform British Columbians and forest product consumers about the beauty,carbon friendliness, economic and other benefits of British Columbia’s forests and forest products.
  2. All taxpayer supported buildings in British Columbia – federal, provincial and municipal must, and private sector buildings should, utilize and demonstrate wood and wood products whenever and wherever possible.
  3. We should review our forest management and silviculture practices to ensure that they encourage maximum productivity, value and support forest resilience.
  4. We should encourage the Western Climate Initiative to include forests in the identification of cap and trade opportunities for carbon credits.
  5. We should enable the establishment of short-rotation fibre plantations.
  6. We should establish a Carbon Offset Credit program for restoration of forests killed by the Mountain Pine Beetle where credits could be purchased.
  7. We should establish commercial forest land reserves for key portions of the current forest land base where wood production will be a primary focus.
  8. We should work to streamline transactions between government and industry to support a vigorous, efficient and world-competitive wood processing industry.
  9. We should offer competitive bid timber sales as area-based sales and review our timber pricing system to ensure it is as simple and transparent as possible.
  10. The provincial government and Union of British Columbia Municipalities should work with industry to ensure municipal tax structures support competitiveness and industrial activity in British Columbia communities.
  11. We must establish labour arrangements that advance productivity and support competitiveness and investment while maintaining good working conditions and an adequate standard of living.
  12. We should clearly define compensation rules for agreements between government and licensees, and in particular, what constitutes a taking of rights awarded through agreements and how compensation levels will be assessed.
  13. We should establish clear competition policies to guide the transfer of tenure between licensees.
  14. We should respond to the urgent needs of business, workers and communities during the current global economic downturn.
  15. We must advance bioenergy and biofuel projects by creating competitive tenure and pricing frameworks to attract private sector investment.
  16. We should establish a Wood Innovation and Design Centre focused on bringing together builders, architects, designers, artists and engineers to advance the commercialization of value-added wood building and design products.
  17. We should create a forum to bring together leaders from the forest sector with those from chemical, energy, and other sectors to identify new wood based product and market opportunities.
  18. We should continue to diversify forest product markets with particular emphasis on emerging markets such as China, ensuring that marketing efforts are sustained, coordinated and based onwhat end users want.
  19. We should be proactive in exploring ways to ensure wood fibre is available for industry growth and product diversification while respecting tenure holders’ rights.
  20. We should increase the percentage of fibre that is available through competitively-bid timber sales.
  21. We should develop an internet-based wood market.
  22. Logs that are surplus to British Columbia manufacturing needs should be exported until local manufacturing capacity exists. The surplus test currently in use should be reviewed to ensure it is rigorous.
  23. We should expand the Community Forest Agreement Tenure program.
  24. British Columbia forest policies should reflect the unique forest attributes and socio-economic circumstances in different parts of the province.
  25. We should create more long term, area-based forest tenures that are of an economically viable size,and create legislation for a First Nations forest tenure.
  26. Revenue-sharing with First Nations should be proportional to the value of timber harvested in their respective territories instead of being calculated on a per capita basis.
  27. We should encourage business and First Nations to become full partners in forestry businesses, in particular in emerging areas of opportunity including biofuels, bioenergy, carbon and reforestation.
  28. We should strive to build capacity among First Nation governments, First Nation forest corporations and First Nation forestry institutions to achieve full participation in forest activities.
  29. We should collaborate with First Nations to involve First Nations youth in forest employment opportunities.


Bell says the  participants  insisted on  use of the word "we" as it will take involvement of all involved in the industry to make it work "Roundtable members are clear that no one entity can solve the problems facing the forest sector, or position the industry for future success. While it's certain that government will continue to play a leadership role and the report will help shape forest policy, the recommendations are directed at all those involved in the forest industry. We all need to act together to achieve the benefits a vibrant forest industry can offer."

"There are some very high level recommendations that can be delivered in a specific way, we agreed that to be very specific would require hundreds and hundreds of recommendations" says Bell.   While there is no real time line for implementation, Bell says this report is more than a list of suggestions "The commitment that I am making, is that we will review and deliver an update on this report each year at the Truck Loggers Association convention."


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

we should,we should all very good recommendations but the underlying problem is still where do we sell the wood products to.
Lots of "we shoulds" in there. They just don't see it. The only thing that will improve the forestry industry is mother nature (pine beetle) and time (economic problems of the US).
"Logs that are surplus to British Columbia manufacturing needs should be exported until local manufacturing capacity exists. The surplus test currently in use should be reviewed to ensure it is rigorous."

Sheer genius. If we keep exporting there will be no local manufacturing capacity. The current surplus test is rigorous, the logs are leaving the country. Seems like the current motto of the government is "we should". "We should" strap Pat Belly to an exported log and track his progress to see where it ends up.

Agree with the above comment - strap Pat Bell to an exported log and see where he ends up!! What does Pat really know about forestry!!
We should stop trying to BS the people of B.C.One of the "We should" pre election recommendations that was left out...#30
British Columbia Mountain Caribou policies should reflect the unique attributes and socio-economic circumstances that exist in different parts of the province.

In this case the province is being managed like the land base is as homogenous as Prince Edward Island. The government is being led around by the nose by the ForestEthics and Wild Sight agenda. Those two groups are calling for the government to chase down a bunch of our local caribou, load them into trucks and ship the local Mountain Caribou to points south. This was tried before, and all the caribou died, but no one seems to care about facts once ForestEthics shows up with a petition.

What a bunch of BS --- if I were part of the roundtable I would be embarrased by this report --- what a waste of time.
"What does Pat really know about forestry!!"

Hopefully more than what Lois Boone knew about highways - when she was Minister of Highways!
The roundtable is colemans brain child.. Go figure.
A bunch of fluff.
This is what came out of all of Coleman's closed door meetings with industry, communities and some token union representation came up with?

It took them a f$%king year to come up with this nonsense list of WHAT EVERYONE ALREADY KNEW!

Atta boy Pat! This was all taxpayer money well spent!
19. We should be proactive in exploring ways to ensure wood fibre is available for industry growth and product diversification while respecting tenure holders’ rights.

22. Logs that are surplus to British Columbia manufacturing needs should be exported until local manufacturing capacity exists. The surplus test currently in use should be reviewed to ensure it is rigorous.

Absolutely sickening. Let's make sure log exports remain uninhibited and when they run out, find them more wood to export!


We need to get these clowns attenion in the Government(and that means all levels)They need to realize that we have had enough!General strike, road blocks,demonstrations,civil disobedience,we need to do something now before they totally f%$% up this province!
I cannot believe they are saying raw logs should be exported. That is just hogwash. There should be absolutely NO raw log exports. Pisspulper is absolutely right, there will never be any local manufacturing capacity if we export the raw material. How about some incentive programs for manufacturing these log her in our province.
totally, utterly ridiculous!!!
pisspulper:- "We should" strap Pat Belly to an exported log and track his progress to see where it ends up."
----------------------------------------

We already know where that'll be, pisspulper. On the hog fool pile.
Provincial election in May....
Comment Posted by: socredible on March 10 2009 8:27 AM

We already know where that'll be, pisspulper. On the hog fool pile.

That's hilarious. I like it! :0
Log exports, competitive pricing on timber to allow others to remove fiber from a community, figure a way to easily transfer a timber license from one holder to the next and last but not least continue to export logs that are surplus in B.C. until manufacturing capacity is such that all timber can be consumed in B.C. If all of this is implemented you can kiss the sawmill and pulp industry good bye except for some big, strategically placed plants owned by the friends of the B.C. Government (CANFOR & WEST FRASER).
Pat Bell is a logger turned politician and all he cares about is profits, power, and brownie points where he can get them. He has never cared about bettering communities and keeping communities vibrant or attractive to investors. over the last 15 or 20 years or so can you count how many mills were shut down and how many communities have been poverty stricken because of the changes in forest practices. The Gov has been directly involved in the making of these decisions and has waded forward regardless of consequence. If the mills that were shut down and dismantled over the years were still in existence today, they still would not be operating. The reason for this is simple, other countries have told our government that they will purchase lumber from B.C. as long as they have access to competitively priced purchase logs from B.C. This means the Gov has weighed the pros and cons of their re-election possibilities and consequently decided to take the timber from the areas where they felt it would have the lowest impact on their re-election possibilities. If we wish to continue to have a manufacturing industry within our communities we will continue to be held hostage and we will continue to sell logs. This is a form of a lumber productivity cap that has been placed on us by our own Gov. In exchange for reducing our lumber producing capacity we have agreed to give up raw logs in it's place, we've lost ground on both sides "thrown the baby out with the bath water so to speak".
Pat Bell does not care whether the mills run out side of his voting bank account or not. You have to remember "for every sawmill and pulp mill worker there are two loggers in the bush" (Pat Bells words). Exporting of timber is cheaper and easier to manage by the loggers and corporations and because of the price of logs on the open market it also puts more money in the pockets of the corporations and the loggers. This is Pats home turf guys, he will always look after loggers and big corporations first, the apple does not fall far from the tree.
Maybe it's time to quit growing apples!!!!
It's like I said awhile ago Product of Canada MADE IN CHINA! Like everything in this country. While they pay them 10 cents hour. You and I will still pay top price. They will not realize what they have done to this country until it is too late. Go to any store and try to find 10 items out of 20 you pick-up that are made here. The Government has manufactured us out of work. They'll find out in about 5 years when they are not recieving the tax dollars they so like to spend FREELY.
Private Landowners have the right to sell their own timber to whomever they wish for fair market value- if this means log exports so be it. Approx. 50% of my logs are going to Japan.
"The Love Of Money Is The Root Of All Evil" When the topic of Raw Log Exports comes up, you begin to see the selfish,not so big picture, thinking of some.
Dirtcheap- I am not in the business of subidize union workers or mills who can not afford to pay the fair market value for wood. I see the big picture and it is not hand outs.
Dogs' "big picture" likely includes importing low-waged "guest workers" when the export market for his logs are glutted, the price falls, like it will, and his "overpaid" BC workers won't agree to work for less than it costs them to live, just to keep their 'jobs'.
To Dogs- I asked for the truth and I got It. Thanks for your honesty