Clear Full Forecast

Credit for Time Served Legislation Introduced

By 250 News

Friday, March 27, 2009 10:39 AM

Ottawa, Ont. - Government House Leader and MP for Prince George-Peace River, Jay Hill, has introduced legislation to limit the amount of credit that courts may grant to convicted criminals for time they served in custody prior to sentencing.

 
“This bill will ensure that individuals found guilty of crimes serve their full sentence by strictly limiting the amount of credit that may be granted for time served in custody prior to sentencing,” said Minister Hill.  “We are making good on our campaign commitment to bring in truth-in-sentencing.  Victims of crime deserve no less.”
 
The proposed Criminal Code amendments in this legislation would provide the courts with sentencing guidance and limits for granting “credit for time served”.
 
Specifically, the legislation would:  
·         make it the general rule that the amount of credit for time served be capped at a 1-to-1 ratio – granting only one day of credit for each day served in pre-sentencing custody;
·         permit a credit to be given at a maximum ratio of up to 1.5-to-1 only where the circumstances clearly justify;
·         require courts to explain the circumstances that justified a higher ratio;  and,
·         limit the pre-sentencing credit ratio to a maximum ratio of 1-to-1 for individuals detained because of their criminal record or because they violated bail, with no enhanced credit permitted under any circumstances.
 
Courts typically take into account certain factors in determining the amount of credit for pre-sentencing custody, such as overcrowding or a lack of programming for inmates. The existing sentencing regime has resulted in courts traditionally awarding credit at 2-to-1 for pre-sentencing custody.  Credit has even been awarded as highly as 3 days off for each day served, while contributing inadvertently to long backlogs in bringing cases to trial.  Provincial governments and victims’ groups have been calling for the reforms introduced today by the federal government.

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Why is any credit whatsoever warranted when a criminal is found to be guilty?
Doesn't seem they were tough enough with this.
Guilty as charged...no credit for time served.
As in...too bad,so sad, that you had to wait 3 months to come to trial.
You are guilty... so who cares how long you sat in jail?
I have never found this credit fair, if you are found quilty your get a reward but if you are found not-quilty no credit no reward.
giving credit for time served because the jails were overcrowded is hogwash. Put up tents or like they used to do way back when. You want a roof over your heads here is the material build one. You are giving the victims of crime a slap in the face if you grant any form of early release.
I agree with all the comments above and the bill. You do the crime you serve the time.
"but if you are found not-guilty no credit no reward". WTF is that supposed to mean? Maybe we should just shoot first and ask questions later.........oh! we do that now. I see!
now lets see a 'time served for crime done' bill. You know, one that gives serious time to people who do crimes. If we are too timid for that then at least some serious time for folks who do 5, or 10 or 20 crimes. I hereby swear i will not not piss and moan about an increase in my taxes to build a new jail or two to house habitual criminals.
Canada is to soft on crime. Thats why they come here and do business they know that they'll only get a slap on the wrist for any serious crime they commit. When their out on bail they are even protected by the RCMP at tax payers expence.