Clear Full Forecast

Business Issues and The Next Federal Election

By

Tuesday, November 22, 2005 03:30 AM

As an impending Federal election appears to be in the works, it’s time to look at some of the issues affecting Canadian businesses. Each of these issues needs to be discussed by each political party and a solution implemented. So, while some of these issues are not new, they are largely created by the changes in technology and the globalization of the Canadian economy.

One issue which has been on the business agenda for a number of previous elections is regarding the lowering of corporate tax rates in Canada. In order to be competitive with the US and other countries, we need to have an income tax structure which allows Canadian businesses to be competitive. At present, our corporate tax rates weigh Canadian businesses down, making them uncompetitive in the Global marketplace. This is especially true when we are competing against our neighbor to the South.

Another problem Canadian businesses encounter is the need to become more efficient in order to compete. Unfortunately, part of this efficiency gap is created because of the size of our country and the distances over which we travel and transport goods and services. The dilemma is that business can’t start to alleviate this problem without the assistance and leadership of the Federal Government.
A major hurdle which hinders business in Canada in general, and more specifically Prince George, is the need for the developing, constructing and upgrading of infrastructure. While this certainly includes infrastructure such as highways, ports, and airports, it also includes other components such as high speed fiber and wireless towers. All of these components are essential for an efficient and competitive business environment in Canada. Prince George is a prime example of a Canadian community which will grow and prosper from investment in infrastructure, such as the Port of Prince Rupert, wireless internet and cell service along the transportation corridors, and a Ring Road system around our City. The efficient and safe movement of goods, materials and information is essential to creating an efficient economy.
On the heels of federal infrastructure spending is the capital spending Canadian businesses make each year. Unfortunately, our current tax structure does little in the way of providing business with an incentive to invest in high tech and innovative assets, such as high tech machinery or communication equipment. Currently, the useful life of this type of asset is very short, usually three years or less. However, Canadian tax laws do not allow businesses to write off of these assets in accordance with their useful life. This means that most businesses are reluctant to invest their capital in these types of assets. Tax changes must be made in order to allow quicker write offs of capital investments.

Another method the Federal government could use to help Canadian businesses become more efficient would be to provide more incentives for Research & Development, including making more funding available for qualifying projects. The development of new products is one of the most important ingredients used by business to increase productivity and efficiency. However, due to the large start up costs and uncertainly associated with R & D, businesses are reluctant to undertake any new product development with out some form of risk reduction. R & D funding helps provide businesses with the risk reduction they need.
The other issue involving R & D which needs to be addressed by the federal government is the amount of “red tape” which is required in order for a business to qualify for, and receive, R & D funding or tax credits. This process needs to be streamlined to reduce the bureaucratic process which tends to inhibit R & D in Canada. Just making the process easier and less onerous will help to encourage R & D throughout Canadian businesses.

Post secondary education and skills development need to be encouraged in order for Canadian business to assemble the most educated and skilled workforce in the global economy. Without access to a skilled workforce, Canadian business will be left behind. At present, we are seeing a shortage of skilled labor such as machinists, computer technicians and welders which negatively impacts the productivity of the Canadian economy.

Finally, the Federal Government needs to encourage collaboration between Universities and Canadian businesses in order to facilitate the development and production of new and innovative products and services. At present, universities undertake an immense amount of research, much of which could be developed into marketable products or services. At present, there is disconnect in this area, and most products never make it to the market place. Encouraging collaboration between universities and business will enhance this process and provide new products and services, ensuring Canada is one of the most efficient economies in the global marketplace.

By implementing these recommendations, the Federal Government will encourage an increase in the productivity of Canadian business, which will lead to a healthier Canadian economy. 

-Myron Gordon owns TMSG Management Services Group, which provides management and financial services to growing businesses. 


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

The only way business is presently going to get a break or any federal help, would be to channel a large percentage of the funds back into the liberal party and that is the 'end of story'. If we get a new government, things might change but don't hold your breath. Canadian governments are corrupt and that's the way it is. It will remain that way until we have a revolution. Nothing will get done about this terrible form of government until then and all the writing and suggestions are useless. Dictators will come and go in this country under different names but they all work toward the same goal. We must break out ties with the United Nations and with the NAFTA in order for this country to prosper and grow. Period.
Here we go again trying to suck money out of the Government for Private Business. Short memories seem to prevail in this town.

Item; A number of years ago there was a major scandal in Canada. Hundreds of millions of dollars that was given to Private Companies for Research and Development went missing. In most cases there was no research and development done. Nor as I recall was there anyway for the Government to retreive the money.

As a matter of interest the Federal Government has provided $2.75 billion for 275 projects through the Technology Partnerships Canada, since 1996. To date they are apparently aware of $3.7 million in improperly siphoned cash. Industry Minister Emerson is looking into the situation to ensure that no more money goes missing. Do we need to give more money to Industry????.

Item. A number of years ago we got rid of the 7% production tax that was assessed against companys that produced in Canada. The elimination of this tax was to make Canadian companies more competitive with the USA. The Government of course had to bring in the GST to replace the lost revenue from the production tax. Canadian companies export 80% of their production, and all exports are exempt from the GST. Most companies and especially the lumber industrie are much more competitive that their American counter parts and acutally boast about it. That is one reason why the Americans have established Duties on Canadian Lumber. (Unfair Competition) Are you suggesting we should give Canadian Industry more money to compete. If they cant compete then they should go broke, not come to me as a taxpayer to bail them out.

Item. I agree on the need for infrastructure, however you may have noted that the Federal Government on Oct. 21, 2005 announced 500 million dollars for infrastructure, ports, and railway upgrades in the greater Vancouver area, however no mention of money for the Interior.

Item. We would have lots of skilled labor in this country if we had a decent apprenticeship program, however most business do not want to spend any money on apprenticeships, they would sooner the Government train the workers at my expense. In addition business's in this country do not do anything to retain their workers, in most cases they cant lay them off, or pension them off fast enough. The shortage of skilled labour is totally the result of bad business practices in this country.

Lastly. You write your column for no other reason they to fill the page with words. There has been little if any research into what you say. We would expect more from someone who is trying to run a business.
Great post Mike. The buck starts and stops with you. If we want a democracy we are going to have to fight for it. We need to pick our battles and then win them.

The revolution IMO starts in three years when we get to vote to replace the current voting system in BC with the BC-STV system. It is not the final solution, but it is a good start in the right direction. 59% of BC voters supported this last election and I’m sure after things like the MLA pay raise it will become law through referendum before the next Provincial election.

I myself have a political umbrella for those who want a democracy. Currently the Democratic Futures Party sits dormant, but will come alive in time for the referendum and the next provincial election. Its going to be an insurgency campaign from the grass roots that retakes our democracy.

As for the UN, I agree. It was designed by and for empires and not democracies. The system of veto power empires is something from the 18th century. That said it is good for keeping dialogue with the rouge dictators. NAFTA on the other hand is nothing more then a tool for multinationals and borderless capital that is chasing the least common denominator in social and environmental governance with the goal of subverting our democracies to a higher form of corporate governance.

My solution would be a BC Fair Trade Agreement. An agreement that follows the principle of grass roots democracy where every member legislative region (not nation) has an equal vote per region, and a per capita vote as per the direction of regional governments. Both votes would need a majority to amend any of the BCFTA governing charter.

The BCFTA charter I envision would be one that has three main principles for free trade to take place. #1 All member regions must meet a minimum worker standard. #2 All member regions must meet a minimum environmental regulation standard. #3 All member regions must meet a minimum democratic standard. This is essential for the protection of our society as we now know it and any trade that does not respect this is designed to undermine our society and our democracy. Fair trade is not free as free trade requires no adherence to the laws we require of our own industry here in Canada.

A BCFTA is essential for this regions growth with over 50% of global trade taking place in the Pacific Rim, and our having proximity to this region. It can be implemented at a provincial and state level in North America going above and beyond federal trade agreements, which we could fall back on if a trading country does not meet the higher standards of the BCFTA.

The war on terror should be a war on poverty and the people who take advantage of poverty. Currently we are agents of the enemy enabling their propaganda with our corporate run trade policies. The BCFTA in conjunction with the BC-STV is the silver bullet that brings our fifth column of corporate insider agents in government to an end, as well as their enabler organizations like the WTO, IMF, and other corporate oriented governing bodies.

IMO BC is uniquely positioned with our location as well as our resources and political independence to initiate just such an ideal on the world. If we can’t do it here in BC then the world itself is destine to be subjected to a global war on terror till the corporate world has consolidated into one big New World Order.

Time Will Tell