Clear Full Forecast

Olympic Series Part Four...The Northern Share

By Ben Meisner

Thursday, December 08, 2005 04:00 AM

When the Vancouver Olympic Committee's John Furlong spoke in Prnce George last week, he neglected to mention that the Olympics were about 50% above budget, that translates into about $400 to $500 million dollars.  

Based on the formula that rural BC accounts for about 67% of all money flowing into the province, $268 million is the amount we are being called upon to pony up. There are some in Prince George who seem bent on trying to hook our wagons onto the Olympic torch, but is there northern support?

Walk down the street or strike up a conversation and if you get around to talking about the Olympics you will quickly get a stern look.  By and large, there is a  good number of Northern B.C. residents  who don't support the 2010 games.  When Furlong neglects to mention when he’s in town that he needs another $400 million and instead talks about the sacrifices we must make in order to hold the event, you tend to get some grimacing looks .

If you break down the number of seats in the province then it should hold that about 500 million dollars should be made available for this type of event outside of the city of Vancouver, it however “ain’t” going to happen. 

To this point we have been tossed a bean or two with the government believing that it will be sufficient to keep us quiet and standing at the sidelines boosting the affair. 

The government did some slick selling of the games early on when it handed out about 33% of the tickets to the aboriginal population thereby guaranteeing support. At the same time, it also brought that section of society into the fold with a view to having them on board and not raising any sort of a fuss.  You've seen the footage from  some countries when the games have been staged and the poor have been parked outside of the stadium. The Olympics are not for the poor, for that matter, other than a chosen few, they are not for the average individual  who will find that they will be parked in front of their TV watching the events as they have in the past in spite of the fact they are taking place within 800 kilometers of our door. 

Furlong, the CEO of the games, said there will about 77 billion in construction in the lower mainland leading up to the affair. Whistler, which will see a huge increase in spending driving the prices up for the locals, quite frankly didn’t need the boost in its economy. It has already been hot as a destination and all this event will do is make it more prohibitive for the average BC resident to access. 

If government at all levels wants our support then it is time for the residents of this region to say , “what’s in it for us “.  A feeling of pride is a great thing for the people of the province.  Tthe problem however remains that the bills that flow in following the event are to be shared by all of the residents. That ten day party may leave us with a multi million dollar hangover.

The cupboard is void of money and with an infrastructure that is in need of repair (such as the Cameron St. Bridge) where will this money come from to ensure that we are spreading the wealth of the province equally amongst everyone?

 


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

No comment, since you have said it all! What is there to add? Except perhaps that politicians breathe rarer air than us "mortals" when they have their heads in the clouds!
Yeah Diplomat, and we all have our heads in the sand-and they keep kicking our butts and driving us down deeper.
It is a wonder we are breathing at all, now isn't it.
They lie, they cheat, they basically steal from us, but being the placid nice people we are, we turn the other cheek, and allow it to go on.
Remember, we do not rebel, we accept-so tell me who in hell is to blame????
Not them.
The wealth spread will be limited to the Lower Mainland.
We are many miles distant from them.
Out of sight-out of mind.
We exist-but do not be foolish enough to think we count for anything-other than taxes.
So be it.
Yes, Gypsy, they do the same things over and over, relying on voter amnesia and apathy! Angry letters are written to the newspapers about some obvious irritation. The writers express their frustration, but often forget the shenanigans of past governments which may at the root of the present difficulty!

For instance, during the ten years of the last NDP episode the debt of British Columbia doubled, from 17 Billion to 34 Billion because an average annnual deficit of 1.7 Billion was incurred. This means that it costs approximately 7 million dollars per day must be paid out of our tax dollars to service the interest charges on this debt.

Now, people are complaining about insufficient funding for a great number of things, but no one remembers how much good an additional 7 million dollars per day could do for healthcare, education and so forth.

Go figure. The numbers are on record in Victoria for those who have eyes to see.
Ben good points.

IMO we need to create an eco-tourism initiative to put the North in a positive light cultivating a positive image of our region. We still have time.

If we can do that proactively, then we can get the government to use the Olympics as a spot light for the initiative and orient our tourism advertising around this type of event that generates returns for the North and not exclusively for the South.

We have an industry in the North that has been aborted before birth, and yet has huge potential to become a prime generator of not only pride, but income for the region with the decline of the softwood lumber industry. The Chinese and Japanese and big city folk of North America and Europe are eger to explore, but we don't have the infrastructure to accomodate them, nor the tour operators in place to serve them. This could be changed with little effort, and IMO could be of huge opportunity for the native's in the North as a self sustaining lifestyle type source of revenue.

I own the trademark Eco-tourism 2010 and I would be willing to lend it to the city for this purpose if I was sure it wouldn't be abused. I plan to present the city with my plan this comming spring.

Time Will Tell
Chadermando, please explain what you mean precisely by "eco-tourism" in our north - in the winter, especially.
Diplomat, my definition of eco-tourism may not be politically correct, as I believe nature can be celebrated in many ways.

Eco-tourism can be many things from a visit to nature just to be there, to those who make an activity out of it. Some people just like to come sit around a campfire and take lots of pictures, others come to see the wild life, others come to participate in a hunt. Some people just want to relax fishing in a remote lake or stream, and others want to white water raft, or go up river in a riverboat, or to the top of the mountains on a sled tour. Some may just want to walk a rustic trail, other will want to ride a rustic trail. The north has natural opportunities for all of these things.

The key is how do all of these independent operators reach their market, and how can their clients know they will have quality assurance. How do we link tour operators with employees, and employees with tour operators, and how do tour operators get started with their own potential business. More important how can we ensure vital pieces of the puzzle are not restricted by bad infrastructure, abusive landowners, or false perceived impressions.

I have the answers, and in time I will be going public with my plan and the data base web site that will support my plan. Right now I have some cash issues that I have to get lined up first before I go public. I have strategic assets I would like to own so I can participate fully in the benefits.

Time Will Tell
Chadermando ....

The question was asked “What is ecotourism”. I think the generally accepted definition would involve travel to areas of natural or ecological interest, typically under the guidance of a naturalist, for the purpose of observing wildlife and learning about the environment. Dan Hunter’s “Strider Adventures” into the Kakwa, operating out of Prince George would be one such organization.

While there are some small operations like that, and there is potential for more within a 2 or 3 hours road travel radius of Prince George, I think there is a credibility gap with having the portal of an eco-tourism industry be a city which has some of the worst polluted air in the country, that is the "capital of the tree harvesting industry" with a logging truck every minute or so moving through Hwy 16 and Domano, that has three major pulp mills visible on the drive in from the airport, that has a native population visible primarily through destitute street people, that has sprawling “rural” properties with tons of junk visible as approaches the airport runway, and so on.

There are direct flights from Vancouver to Smithers and Prince Rupert. Either one of these would be existing communities with both the airport facilities and both visual and actual ecological credibility to act as portals to “eco-tourism” experiences. An improved airport in Valemount would do the same for that “northern” part of the province. We have a lot of clean up to do in this community if we want to diversify in that direction and we may not have some key ecological sites of the type which will draw tourists in significant numbers.

If we can show that the site potential is there, the question is do we want to go there? Or are we better off staying with the resource extraction industry? I am afraid I do not consider resource extraction as practiced in this region and eco-tourism as compatible. If we want to do both, we have to change our practices, make those practice changes highly visible, and use them as part of the “drawing card”.
Chadermando ....

If you are interested in starting a heated discussion you might want to begin discussing whether hunting and ecotourism can coexist.

I doubt that those who are interested in observing wildlife in its "natural" habitat would like to be housed in the same vicinity as those who hunt wildlife for trophies. To me, ecotourism is simply not compatible with foreigners coming in here to hunt.
Like I have said from the start....." All 250 will see from this is the bill"
Owl I think your looking at things with rectal-optics.

I think one would have to be creative, but anyone who has been out and about knows that we have some of the most wild and untouched wilderness in the world surrounding Prince George. Facts are that already we are a destination place for many people who come to this region for exactly that reason. The problem is that it is not yet organized and everyone in the sector is shooting off in every which direction with no game plan or coordination.

As for compatability with the forestry sector, I think it would be a challange, but I think it could also be a win-win situation if it is managed properly. Its the extremist eco-terrorists that bring eco-tourism a bad name, and I think in a lot of cases they are unrealistic and lose a lot of their credibility. I agree there would be problems, but I also thing the two can learn to work together for mutual benefit if managed properly.

As for hunting. I agree this is a delicate issue, but it is possible that if we can show good management practices and create programs for conservation, then it can be done. Part of that I would think could involve a wildlife refuge in the city for orphaned animals that showcases local wildlife.

I can't really go into details right now, but would be happy to in the near future. Lets just say the potential is there and its all about perspective.

Time Will Tell