Clear Full Forecast

I Hope I'm Not Around When Sockeye Disappear From The Nechako

By Ben Meisner

Monday, September 14, 2009 03:45 AM

Permit me to say at the outset, I don’t like the,” I”, word when writing comments, it suggests the writer is the authority on a subject.  I don’t consider myself able to show that kind of intelligence.

However, I can  say that back in 1982, I predicted that the sockeye stocks on the Nechako River system would go the way of the DoDo bird if we allowed Alcan and the Federal government to continue down the path they had chosen. I was booed out of the hall in Vanderhoof that night, but I never strayed from my belief that we're not on a slippery slope, rather, we are on a death march when it came to Salmon on the system.

That path was cast in stone in 1987 when the settlement agreement was made between the province, the federal government (under the guidance of one Brian Mulroney) and Alcan. The man who signed on behalf of the province was then Environment Minister Bruce Strachan.

It was, plain and simple, a sell out of the sockeye along the Nechako River system.

A resource that had contributed up to $70 million a year without so much as a dime being spent to renew the resource other than leaving the poor fish alone.

I have never forgiven Strachan for that move, his family lived on the Nechako, they couldn’t help but see the sockeye passing by and yet the river was signed over to a company which said it was about to expand its aluminum smelting business. I argued at the time this was all about power being sold to the USA and for that, I was called a hypocrite. For making that comment, a by- law passed in both Kitimat and Terrace  saying Rafe Mair and I,  were not welcome in those towns.

28 years later there is no smelter and as a matter of fact, Rio Tinto, (Alcan) has increased its sales of hydro to BC and for export while reducing the number of people employed at the smelter.  

To add insult to injury the NDP who under the stewardship of NDP Premier Mike Harcourt held an inquiry to stop the death of the sockeye, only to be overruled by NDP premier Glen Clark who gave the farm away to Alcan by signing a new deal allowing Alcan to sell more power under the guise that, “they had to do it”.

That agreement was signed by Paul Ramsey who should have known better.  

I don’t want the reigning Liberals to be able to slip under the door.  It was under the stewardship of Gordon Campbell that Alcan rolled along receiving what I consider to be deals so good that even the BC Utilities Commission didn’t like them. Campbell wrote me a letter back in the early 90’s saying he would protect the sockeye. It was a hollow promise indeed.  The sockeye fishery lies in ruins.

So where are we today? Well we are blaming ocean currents, sea lice and every other item we can for the complete collapse of the sockeye run on the Nechako. Isn’t it rather strange that the demise of the fishery has come on the Nechako and there are two common denominators reduced flows and increased water temperatures?  

The money the fishery once produced is long gone, instead we have a mega company selling power on the backs of the fish and we continue to sit around and watch the death throes of the resource. I have not given up the fight, but I fear that the fish, unable to cope with ever increasing temperatures as a result of water being diverted away from their river, face certain death.

When that comes, will the government of the day, simply say, well global warming or some other culprit was the cause of their demise?  Or will they say Oh! Well !, now that we don’t have any salmon in the Nechako it seems to make good sense to divert more water and make more money from hydro electric power, after all the river doesn’t support a salmon fishery?

I do hope that I’m not around when that happens  for while my fight has been long and unending I have been labelled as  a malcontent  and the only friends that I have are the fish,  who have no voice in the matter.

I'm Meisner, and that's one man's opinion.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Well Ben this single issue is one of the things I admire the most about you. You are 100% correct from my point of view regarding the salmon resource and corporate profit river policy.

Public policy these days is about subsidizing corporate profits at the expense of the environment, the middle class, and the free enterprise economy.

IMO the fight is bigger than just one company and one river... it is pervasive across our whole political spectrum that has become nothing more than a glorified show trial for public consumption to give the air that we live in a functioning sovereign democracy... when in fact Carl Marx would be proud of the kind of corpocracy we have become. The 5th column ism's have almost completed the dream of the banksters communist one world order is becoming more and more clear every day. Soon the only profits that will matter will be the banker profits at the expense of everything else including our salmon, and our rivers, lakes, and the air we breath.

People need to begin to think independent of organized political parties....

Time will tell
Your comments indicate once again that our politicians and many members of the public who perpetually elect them do not know the difference between "wealth" and "money".

The demise of the salmon on the Nechako is but one of a continuing number of examples where we waste a real resource irredeemably in a fruitless quest for a "mirage" ~ a (flawed) "refelection" of supposed "wealth" that supposedly will allow us greater access to a better life ~ if only we could get "enough" of it.

But whenever the question is asked, "How much is 'enough'?", the answer received is always, "Just a little bit more." That's the way it is with "money". As it is.

The truth is, we'll never have 'enough'. Not the way we're going. And it seems we're fated to continue on that path until we've destroyed all the "real" things that existed from time immemorial in bountiful abundance for us to use ~ but use wisely ~ in our never ending quest for an "illusion" we somehow think can give us "more". Can it? Has it ever? And "more" of "what"? Will the "money" we seek really be "wealth" when there's nothing to buy with it?

Does it really make sense tocontinue to try to make mere "figures" DETERMINE actual "facts"? Just because we are too stupid, or stubborn, to try to make those "figures" properly REFLECT actual "facts"? That's the real problem with the demise of the salmon, and all the other plentiful resources we do our unwitting best to try to make scarce. We've got a flawed reflection, and we're mistaking it for reality.
"Public policy these days is about subsidizing corporate profits at the expense of the environment,"

The greatest boom times in North America have always been directly linked to corporations and peoples ability to externalize costs. From WWII to the 80s when the enviroment took a clear back seat was a era of boom for everyone. Jobs, money and profits came easy while effluent was being dumped into our air and waterways.

Its just wrong to suggest that this is a new development. This has been going on since the industrial revolution and in real terms has actually been decreasing in the last 20 years.
Thank you for your vigilance Mr. Meisner.
Do not despair, you have made a difference.
Becoming persona non grata with a couple of two bit towns should be worn as a badge of honour, for all the kowtowing that the municipal, provincial, and federal politicians have done at the feet of the great corporation ( alcan/rio tinto )
has not made one positive change for us, or our environment, in which I include the salmon. If I may summarize what Eagleone and Socredible so aptly describe;
"It's about the money" Call it corporate greed if you will, but it still boils down to money and power hungry human beings, who will stop at nothing to further their monetary dominance. Their thirst can never be slaked, for the root of their desire is in the love of money. The more they accumulate, the more they want.
metalman.
You are so correct, Ben! At the very, very least Rio Tinto should pay for a salmon hatchery on the Nechako...you see signs of what the river used to be when driving to Kenney Dam and it is really sad because it has all the signs of being a really productive salmon stream.

But the fact that DFO is an afterthought for the federal government, the same way Ministry of Environment is for provincial government doesnt leave me with much optimism.

I heard a conspiracy theory the other day that the govt wants the salmon to disappear on the Fraser so that they can dam it. Sounds so laughable on the surface until you realize how little they are doing to save the fishery
Ben you don't have it quite right. Alcan has always sold what power they where not using to Hydro. The power generation capabilities at Alcan has not increased. That was blocked years ago. Since Acan's generation capacity has not increased the only way they can put more water into the Nechako is decrease their present generation. If Alcan ceased aluminum production to only sell electrical power, they cannot use any more water than they are already using unless they install more generators and upgrade the electrical connection to Hydro.

The Nechako from what I understand is 70% wild so I wonder if other factors are in play for the decrease of the salmon. Maybe its a combination of all factors.
Wrong;
The 1987 settlement agreement between the province, the Federal government and Alcan came about after the federal fisheries took Alcan to court to force them to put more water back into the river after in 1986 Alcan began drawing down 83% of the river flow and turning it into power which was subsequently sold to BC Hydro and Powerex a subsidiary of BC Hydro for export.
That agreement allowed for the removal of just over 70% of the flow of the Nechako River from the just over 83% that Alcan had begun to take.
The settlement agreement further allowed Alcan to go to the 83% figure for the removal of water from the Nechako but not until they had constructed a cold water release facility that was to be paid for out of their own pocket.
In the Glen Clark agreement of the NDP, The province were to ask the federal government to contribute 33%, the Province 33% and Alcan was to put up 33% about 50 million each to construct a cold water release which would then give Alcan the right to the remaining water. As you may know that cold water release facility was never built and it is now suggested that it is not needed. The NDP signed an agreement that required Alcan to only put up $ 50 million versus $ 150 million.
You are correct to point out that Alcan did not finish the Kemano project and therefore did not add capacity other then what they took in 1985 and never gave back. They as you may remember shut down about 40% of their production of aluminum and that extra power was sold to BC hydro. The BC utilities Commission would be able to inform you of the number of power sales agreements there are between BC hydro and Rio Tinto (Alcan)
You may also be aware that in the court case , when the city of Kitimat took Alcan to court to try and enforce the 1949 agreement which said the extra power produced by Alcan was to be used for ,” the development of Industry within the vicinity of the Works” the province (current Liberal Government)sided with Alcan at the court hearing saying they believed that the company had the right to sell power and that produced a new company under Alcan which is Alcan Power, to manufacture and sell power.
People have a tendency to have short term memory on this matter. Alcan in 1982 proposed a smelter in Vanderhoof and one in Smithers as the reason why they had begun to take the bulk of the flow of the Nechako. That never materialized nor did I ever think it would. They did however never put back that water which was to be used for a new set of turbines, other then what was given up in the Brian Mulroney 87 settlement agreement. Alcan can make $100 million a year selling power with less than 10 workers. Now the question is, is this being done on the backs of the Salmon of the Nechako system. Aluminum production in Kitimat is secondary, just look at the town to see that, then look at the salmon returns to see who has been the winner.

Ben Meisner
All I am saying is Alcan cannot use anymore water than they have ever used unless they install more generators and upgrade the connection to Hydro.
For what it's worth, I was fishing the Stellako a couple of weeks back and didn't see a single Sockeye in the river. Not sure if they are just late or what, but I was very surprised.

You don't have to look at salmon returns very much to see that there are obvious problems. I was on Quesnel Lake last year in September and same thing, not a salmon to be seen in any of the major creeks dumping into the North and East Arms. I suspect Takla is in the same boat, although I haven't been up that way recently.

I think Ben raises some good points about the Nechako fish specifically, but I also think we need to look at other issues. Fish farms, overfishing, the impacts of logging on stream beds and spawning/rearing habitat, general habitat destruction, etc.

The way that government has allowed this and other situations to occur is simply abhorrent. We are quick to talk about how 3rd world countries are destroying their habitat and forests simply to make money, and yet we do the same thing. We should be simply ashamed of what's hapenning out there.
BorninBC talks about "externalising costs", and how this has been carried on since the advent of the Industrial Revolution. And he's right, it has. And is operating still, in my opinion, more perniciously now than ever. To the detriment of the environment, the middle-class, (and all other "classes"), and the free-enterprise system.

Our large multi-nationals "externalise " their costs nowadays by externalising their production. To wherever the labour is cheapest, and the safety and environmental regulations are either non-existent or not enforced.

So while we may puff out our chests that we've solved the problems of environmental degradation here, albeit in the case of the Nechako salmon well after the fact, when it's essentially meaningless anyways, the real problem has simply been exported elsewhere.

This process is self-defeating, however, and only indicates our stubborn refusal to look back at our vast accumulation of gathered knowledge and seek out the real "cause" of why man must continually make what is plentiful scarce in order to 'financially' make a price for his product in excess of its 'real' costs.

The answer, in my opinion, will be found in understanding how one of modern man's greatest developments functions ~ something without which the Industrial Revolution itself could never have happened ~ double-entry, accrual, cost-accountancy.

How that marvelous discovery really works, and its present, vs. its PROPER, relationship with "money".

Presently, it is "flawed". And the "flaw", which is entirely correctable, does not allow it to properly wholly do what it is otherwise more than capable of doing ~ properly "reflecting" REALITY in meaningful, accurate "financial terms", i.e, equating "money" itself and the "price values" of actual goods and services available or possible that are expressed in "money".

While our modern accounting systems work very effectively within the confines of each individual enterprise utilising them, the figures become very heavily slewed to progressive inaccuracy when ALL businesses and ALL Production and Consumption (the ultimate real purpose of any business is to provide for 'consumption' to serve our needs), are considered together.

It needs an additional component, consistent with its rules and conventions, to make it work properly.