Clear Full Forecast

The Anaconda of Private- For Profit Health care

By Peter Ewart

Thursday, September 24, 2009 03:45 AM

by Peter Ewart

 
The anaconda kills by first wrapping itself around the prey and then bit by bit constricting its coils until the prey suffocates. In the South American jungle, the snake begins life feeding on birds and other small animals. By ingesting these, it gradually grows larger, the size of the prey increasing as it does. Eventually, it can reach the colossal size of 9 metres in length and up to 250 kilograms in weight, and take on large animals like deer and tapirs, and even humans.
 
So goes the privatization of health care in various countries around the world. The large health and health insurance companies, many of which are now multinationals, have been expanding rapidly into areas which were formerly the domain of public health care. Nowhere is this more sad and tragic than in the U.S., as can be seen in the character of the current debate over healthcare reform in that country.
 
When the private for-profit health care industry expands, it, like the anaconda, grows more powerful, not just economically but also politically. It has huge influence now in the U.S., coiling itself around both parties in Congress, stuffing the pockets of many members of the Senate and House of Representatives with millions of dollars in campaign and other types of “contributions.” The extent that the political process has become corrupted is – there is no other word for it - appalling.
 
For example, senator Max Baucus, who is the chair of the Senate Finance Committee and is putting forward the new health reform bill, received more contributions from the private health care industry – an estimated $3.4 million over the last 6 years alone - than any other member in the U.S. Senate.
 
Not surprisingly, discussion about genuine public health care has been by and large suffocated, with the health industry monopolies using their influence in government and media to keep public health care “off the table,” so that even mildly progressive reforms are not considered. This tragedy has happened despite the fact that, under the mainly private health system currently in place, the U.S. has one of the most expensive systems in the world, yet with tens of millions of people uninsured or denied coverage even when they have had insurance.
 
The U.S. is an extreme example of what happens when private health care companies become so powerful that public health care cannot expand, and, in fact, is strangled in the crib, despite a dire need for it in the society. That is the dilemma in the U.S. and it is a cautionary tale for other countries.
 
And those other countries include Canada. In the last several decades, the private for-profit healthcare industry has made major inroads into the realm of public health. For example, a number of hospitals in BC are being built as P3s (Public / Private Partnerships), with foreign based multinationals getting major contracts to operate hospitals in Vancouver, Abbotsford, and other cities, as well as to provide in-hospital services of various kinds. There has also been a proliferation of private for-profit clinics, a number of which are part of multinational chains. 
 
In this expansion, the private, for-profit health industry has been aided and abetted by politicians of various stripes at both the federal and provincial level, who, conscious of the strong support for public health care amongst the populace, operate by stealth, assuring the public that they stand for public health care, while steadily undermining it. 
 
If things keep going this way, we, like the Americans, will one day find out that the private for-profit health monopolies have grown to such a size that our public health care system is suffocated or has been reduced to only a shell, “public” in name, “private” in reality. 
 
Once the “reformed” American model is put in place in Congress - with the full support of the health industry monopolies - watch to see that “model” promoted in Canada by these same monopolies which have also established themselves here. 
 
One of the features of the proposed U.S. legislation - which the health insurance companies love – is that heavy fines (as much as $3800 per family) will be imposed by the U.S. government on the majority of citizens (low income will be excepted) unless they sign up with and pay fees to the insurance companies. Thus, these giant companies will be getting an additional 30 million captive “customers,” who are currently uninsured, along with the millions who are already insured (the so-called trade-off is supposed to be that insurance companies will no longer be able to rule people ineligible for coverage). And this is called “universal” health care.
 
Many people in Canada and other countries are aghast at what is happening in the U.S. and the misconceptions and tremendous confusion that have been generated there about public health care. But we need to be concerned here in Canada also.
 
In that regard, a resolution, which has been co-authored by the city councils of Victoria and New Westminster, is being put forward at the Union of BC Municipalities Annual Convention that starts on September 28th. The resolution call for the provincial government to act immediately to stop “the expansion of private, for-profit medical clinics in B.C.”
 
Do we need the further expansion of private for-profit health care into the province? Do we need more anacondas? Let your local municipal councilors know your views on this important issue.
 
Peter Ewart is a columnist and writer based in Prince George, BC. He can be reached at: peter.ewart@shaw.ca 
 
 
 

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

No more free ride. Time to start paying your own healthcare bills you bum.
There are advantages and disadvantages to both systems. For those who don't want a two-tier health system, it's already here. If you have the money, you can jump the line (which is way too long for many procedures, but that's another discussion).
Peter, the metaphor is accurate, complete, and with purpose. Thank you sir.

gamblor, good comeback... NOT
Show me the free Ride, we do pay plenty already in Ways of Income ,Sales and many other Taxes like your Health Care Fees ,or do you think Taxes are just to Finance Wars rather then taking Care of your own ?
People who work for a living pay for themselves plus all the bums who don't work. The only people who are afraid of private healthcare are bums living off the hard work of others. If you pay taxes, I commend you - but doesn't it suck paying for all the parasites too?
Socialized health care isn't working. How about some realistic suggestions to make health care viable rather than more fear mongering about about the big, scary U.S.
Gamblor!! Just because someone is poor does not make them a BUM! A lot of seniors are poor and you are suggesting that makes them less than deserving. Most of the students are poor and living below the poverty line, does that make them a BUM as well? If you lost your job today and needed help would that make you a BUM? Get a grip and have some compassion for God's sake, if not for him then for yourself.
So what , I rather give some of it to the so called Parasites some of them never made in this Dog eat Dog World.
Just because one works does not mean one pays for healthcare to the extent one uses it. Those who use it less than others and those who make more than others are likely the dominant payers.

It is the way that society that takes care of its own works.

1. Some people do not make enough to pay income tax.

2. If they don't pay income tax, they also do not pay for MSP and they will likely get prescription drugs for nothing as well.

3. If they do make enough to pay, they might not make enough to cover their fair share of the use of the system. There might actually be people like Gamblor out there who say to themselves that they pay, so they will make sure they and their dependents get their money's worth and access the system more often than they really need to.

4. Then there are those cases where someone does access the system more than others because they have special needs. Cancer, bypass surgery, broken bones due to practicing extreme sports, transplants, etc. etc. - $100,000 in one year. $300,000 in one year. So, others are actually paying for those "bums" as gamblor calls them who have all the bsad luck or simply do not take care of themselves.
Gamblor and eatsbushes take note under the mainly private health system currently in place, the U.S. has one of the most expensive systems in the world, yet with tens of millions of people uninsured or denied coverage even when they have had insurance.
"rather than more fear mongering about about the big, scary U.S."

It's kind of funny. Many here fear going to a US-Based System and the US fears going to a Canadian socialized system. Nobody seems to know what they want.
Once again the argument that there can only be one tier of health care. What nonsense.

We have four tiers now:

Tier One: People with lots of money, who grab their passport and American Express card and fly to wherever they need to for top-notch care. (Do you Jimmy Pattison waits in line at the local hospital?)

Tier Two: Those with some money, who arrange for surgeries in India or Cuba where they can afford the rates and avoid putting their lives on hold for years waiting for care from the clogged Canadian system.

Tier Three: Those with special coverages such as WCB and those on Welfare who can get to the front of the line or access private care here.

Tier Four: the poor working slobs and the self-employed who pay most of the public system's cost but often cannot access it.

Possible, partial solution: allow private clinics for those able and willing to pay, but apply a tax of 20% to all charges that, by law, must be put directly into the public health-care system (not Federal or Provincial "general revenue").
Mutt - I never said we should have the same system as the US. They are many systems besides the Canadian or US versions. The trouble is the incessant fear mongering that any changes to our current system = we get the identical system to the US. It's pure politically motivated BS.