2010 Cops Don't Like Free Speech
By Ben Meisner
Chris A Shaw is the Professor in the Dept of Ophthalmology at the University of British Columbia.
Now the Prof. has been making his sentiments known as to how he feels about the upcoming 2010 Olympics. He says we are facing a huge hangover, it will cost us multi millions when it is over and we are spending $6 Billion for a 17 day party. He is entitled to make his views known. He is, in addition, entitled to make those views known on the public stage.
Now he should be able to do that, but that is not what is happening. Professor Shaw says his girlfriend is being followed around UBC campus , police have been talking to her and asking whether Shaw is a threat to security.
His ex-wife has been interviewed; his neighbours are being queried about whether he might be a threat to security.
He argues that a new by law which prohibits the use of sticks on signs because they could be used as weapons, no voice activated amplication devices, no street theatre or it appears anything that might interfere with those who want to enjoy the Olympics. He can of course protest the games in a “free speech zone” those of course are out of the way where anyone attending won’t be bothered by a man who thinks we have wasted a lot of money on a party for a privileged few.
This kind of conduct should scare the average resident of BC, because it smacks of controlling the masses. If you don’t like the Olympics, sit down shut up and say nothing is the message that is being sent. By speaking your mind, you may be contributing to the rising security costs.
Free speech is just that, controlling free speech is also just that, harassing people who don’t agree with your ideas is the latter.
I'm Meisner and that's one man's opinion.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
Vanoc has made it illigal to even use the word 2010 in any commercial or non profit event dealing with tourism or sports. 2010 is a date and not a trademarkable term like the Olympics would be, but the province gives VANOC trademarkable rights over even the general use term of the date. Canadians and British Columbians have no rights when Vanoc decides on an issue... seems to be what our politicians have decided.
We should protect our borders and we should be doing extensive arial radiation monitoring during the olympics... but inside our borders we should not be trampling on the rights and norms of Canadian society for the sake of the games. If something happens then that is the price of freedom and we deal with it... if nothing happens and no one notices the security, then that is a success for a free society.
Police state tactics hurt our society, our future norms as a society, our image abroad, as well as the good will towards the games.
I for one would be proud to show the world Chris Shaw speaking his opinion to the world during the Olympics even if I didn't agree with a word he had to say. Let the world know we speak our voice in a free society, rather then in 'free speach zones' set up for disenters. Of course we live in a corpocracy so the 'free speach zones' will be the order of the day.