Clear Full Forecast

The Undermining of Sacrifice

By Submitted Article

Sunday, October 18, 2009 04:42 AM

by Justice Wallace Gilby Craig ( retired)

Citizenship Contains Rights, Obligations
 
Citizenship is an entwinement of rights and obligations.
It is that inner voice which keeps us on the straight and narrow, and moves us to do our duty as members of the community.
 
The ultimate test of good citizenship occurred twice in the 20th century: in the Great War of 1914 -1918, and the Second World War of 1939-1945.
 
At 11 a.m. on Nov. 11 we stand, silent, in solemn remembrance of men who were killed in the two wars: 60,000 young men in the Great War, and 42,000 in the Second World War. A great many more sustained lifelong incapacitating injuries.
 
After 1945, demobilized soldiers, sailors and airmen struggled through the transition to civilian life in a new Canada, a land of opportunity, an industrial state that had manufactured all manner of military equipment and sophisticated products. In 1939, Canada’s cupboard was empty, in 1945 it was full; and in the aftermath of the war Canada’s economy continued to expand and diversify.
 
It was a remarkable transition for a million young Canadians: from the depths of the Great Depression to a savage global war, and then back home to enjoy duty’s reward: freedom under law and order in a democratic country.
I often wonder about ordinary young Canadians and whether a glimpse into the experiences of one veteran is typical of others.
 
On Oct. 4, a single page in The Province riveted me to its every word. Under the kicker Jim English: 1924- 2009, the headline read Bridge builder fought with Devil’s Brigade; Coalmont Survivor of Second Narrows Bridge Collapse Was ‘Bulletproof.’
 
It was a fitting tribute to Jim English by Staff reporter Susan Lazaruk. English died in September just before his 85th birthday. Lazaruk portrayed English as a strong and modest man who, when called upon, could do extraordinary things; an exemplary citizen in all respects.
Like so many others working in downtown Vancouver in 1958, I watched the slow progress of the building of a six-lane bridge across Burrard Inlet’s Second Narrows; its seemingly unsupported steel girders extending further and further high above dark and turbulent waters below. On June 17, 1958, word spread that the bridge had collapsed, sending me to a vantage point to stare, stunned, at the devastation of a downed bridge.
 
Eighteen workers were killed, 79 were injured. English plunged to the bottom of the narrows and floated to the surface suffering from extensive bruising, a broken tailbone and a gash on his face. As soon as he recovered from his injuries, English was back on the Second Narrows Bridge continuing his lifelong passion for building bridges.
 
English’s physical strength and toughness was hard-earned during his boyhood. He left home at age 11 to work and board on various farms near Prince George. In 1939, 15-year-old English put adolescence and farming aside and joined the Canadian army.
As a battle-tested foot soldier and sniper, twice wounded, English won transfer to the First Special Service Force, a brigade made up of three elite regiments – a mingling of 700 Canadians with 1700 Americans. Their intensity in combat soon earned them the nickname of The Devils Brigade – inspired by their blackened faces and daring courage.
 
English’s luck as a soldier returned with him to Canada. On March 27, 1948, he married Ruby Ready, a union that continued for 60 years until Ruby’s death on Christmas Day 2008.
 
In 1945, when English and all his comrades-in-arms returned home they settled into making Canadian communities civil and peaceable.
 
Yet within one generation, just 30 years after the war ended, a deviant drug subculture began insinuating itself into society.
 
And during the last 10 years local drug users have become increasingly vocal and organized, propagandizing as the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users and claiming an inherent right to use illicit drugs without moral and ethical constraint. Their ultimate goal: decriminalization of illicit drugs.
 
Anomalous users of cannabis are on a parallel path lead by their pretender, Marc Emery, the self-proclaimed Prince of Pot. Presently in custody in Vancouver, Emery will soon be on his way to the United States to begin a plea-bargained sentence of five years for selling cannabis seeds to Americans. (It was a profitable business).
 
Emery is a self-proclaimed marijuana martyr. In fact he is a serial violator of the law prohibiting possession of cannabis; and, as a pipsqueak scofflaw, he has earned a well-deserved sentence in the reality of an American jail.

 

 In A Nation Forged in Fire – Canadians and the Second World War 1939-1945, authors J. L. Granaststein and Desmond Morton said that “Those men and women who gave their lives might have written great books, discovered cures for disease, or, more likely, simply have lived out their days in peace in their native land. They lost the chance for a full life because of forces beyond their control, beyond their country’s control – forces most of them comprehended only dimly.”
 
“Was it worth it? Was it worth the death, the maiming, the unending pain? That is a terrible question if posed by someone who lost a son, a husband, or a father at Ortona, on HMCS St. Croix, or in a Lancaster over the Ruhr. Even so, there can be only one answer. Was it worth it? Oh, yes.”
 
On Nov. 11, we shall stand silent commemorating the sacrifice of those young men and women; evermore mindful of our rights and obligations as citizens of Canada.
 
 
 

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Wallace Craig is a rare bird...a judge with logic?
Whoa...
I wonder if he was able to apply that same logic when he was on the bench?
I find it 'anomalous' one who would use the death of a good person to incite a political agenda completely unrealted to that persons life. Was Jim English consulted on this agenda before he passed... I doubt it.

IMO Canada fought the war for very differnet reasons than the Europeans, and the world we live in today is one of sovereign nations that owe their sovereignty to Canada more so than even the United States (via our fighting, but also our influence in the creation of the Commonwealth, NATO, and the UN). Those sacrifices by the Canadian soldiers shaped the reality we have today, but to use their achievements 60+ years later to make a political point unrealted to their war is not that cool from my perspective.

As for Marc Emery his rights as a Canadian citizen have been sold out for foreign politics... and that is surely something Jim English did not fight for. Whether you agree with smoking pot or not, it is a shame on Canada for handing over a Canadian citizen to another country when he broke no Canadian laws.
Next time I'm read in the obituaries and I see the death of a hero, maybe I could write a piece relating it through 10 degrees of seperation (shortened to a direct connection) to a judiciary that is enamored with plea bargin deals as examples of Canadian justice that is in reality a source of judicial corruption purpitraited on society by a judiciary that is more guilty at times of injustice then the people they are presiding over.

Justice Wallace is saying he supports plea deals, and he supports extraditing Canadian citizens for crimes that are not illegal in Canada to avoid the politics of a free and sovereign country. He then uses erronious connections to a war hero to make his point.....
I'm with Eagleone's first paragraph on this. I find the gratuitous attack on Mark Emery out of place and insulting to those veterans who died.
You have to remember that some of Harpers pals are wannnabe Yankees.
This is a bizarre and poorly researched article. Do you really think that our veterans fought so that another country could enter ours and persecute a Canadian citizen for something that they refuse to do to their own citizens? American companies continue to sell marijuana seeds to American people and profit from this so called activity.

Our veterans fought for freedom and independance, for the right of ALL Canadian citizens, not just the ones that America the great has chossen.

Give your head a shake.
Where is the Connection to the 2 Wars and the Prince of Pot and I don't call Seeds "Pot", first you have to plant and grow them you may as well call Seeds of Grain "Alcohol", man this Story is far out .
"They lost the chance for a full life because of forces beyond their control, beyond their country’s control – forces most of them comprehended only dimly.”
-----------------------------------------
A very truthful statement. Too bad Judge Craig doesn't expand on it. For surely it must raise the question of just WHO was in 'control' of these dimly comprehended 'forces'? It would hardly justify ones's former position as a "Judge" to say, "Things just happen." Especially when his profession is charged with finding out why they were "caused" to happen, and who was responsible.
Well it was a good read until you mentioned Marc Emery. I'm very happy that someone who believes AMERICAN LAW should be enforced in Canada by our gov't and the RCMP is NO LONGER A JUDGE.
That Mr Emery is a self-made martyr who thinks his cause is more important than Canada's sovereignty is less disturbing than someone who invokes the sacrifices of those who upheld our rights and determinations as a nation and then goes on to toss those efforts aside because you don't personally agree.
Would you be willing to extradite a Canadian who 'blasphemed against Islam' and boke an Iranian law because Iran demanded it? Of course not.
You do not get to choose who and when the Charter of Rights and our National Sovereignty apply, they ALWAYS apply, and as a Judge you should be aware of that.
Sad!
Rights and obligations.....mmmmmm
The right to personal autonomy as long as my actions harm no other person or their property... Which pretty much sums up all rights and can also be described as "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

That is what the soldiers referred to fought and died to protect.

Marc Emery hurt NO other person or their property. He sold seeds for a naturally occurring plant, not drugs. He paid his taxes and campaigned for a change to a law that breaches basic human rights and makes criminals out of consenting informed adults for choosing what happens to their OWN bodies.

Marc Emery is a Prisoner of War, the formally declared "War on Drugs" and is therefore entitled to all the protections of a POW under the Geneva Conventions.
More so as he has NEVER raised armes and taken an active part in the hostilities he should be afforded the protections offered to civilians in a theatre of armed conflict.
The Canadian Government should be ashamed of themselves for violating the rights of their citizens both generally by enforcing the War on Plants and specifically by handing Marc Emery (a peaceful citizen) to a Foreign Government (The Original Aggressors who started the WAR). It is a bit like handing a citizen over to the Nazis during WW2. NOT A GOOD LOOK.
On Nov. 11, you shall stand silent commemorating the sacrifice of those young men and women; evermore mindful of our rights and obligations as citizens of Canada and maybe wonder what they would have thought about what the War on Drugs has done to the "Free" society they died to protect.
This tribute to the physical courage of Jim English, by retired Justice Wallace Gilby Craig, is marred by the gratuitous attack on Marc Emery.

Craig has cultivated a reputation as a "hard liner" who believes that Canadian courts are "soft on crime".

What he appears to be doing in this article is using some details of English's life to make invidious comparisons with Marc Emery's life and to take cheap shots in a "culture war" between past and present.

Whatever Emery's shortcomings may be, he has no illusions about the casualties caused by the misguided "war on drugs" as waged by some American politicians and law enforcement agencies. Emery has shown moral courage -- even if Craig believes that no one who uses marijuana can possess any redeeming virtues.

In addition, Emery's case raises questions about Canadian sovereignty and our sense of justice for Canadian citizens. Craig does not appear to be interested in such matters. He simply wants to punish Emery for his views and activities (such as selling seeds for plants that Craig regards with disdain). At a time when many Americans have voted to legalize medical marijuana, it makes very little sense to rejoice at the spectacle of Emery's imprisonment on foreign soil.
You are wrong sir.
How is it that I have used canabis for 20 years and am neither lazy, deviant or stupid. I am a successful tax paying citizen frustrated by the lack of knowledge of someone as promintent as yourself.
Thankfull you are retired.
In the future I would encourage you to do proper research before usiing your authority to spew biased ignorance.

Another Canadian Cannabis user working to live his days in peace in his native land.

Canada has an extradition treaty with the U.S.,its not about sovereignty. If Emery was selling kiddy porn what would you whiners think then, he was just expressing his artistic talent.

Why do we need any of this crap anyway, can't you people just enjoy life without making it artificial.

Drugs lead to crime, funds terrorism,health costs, step out of your greedy little self centered world and look at the harm.

As a side note at the exact minute the bridge fell the workers pay stopped.
The following letter to the editor was sent to Opinion250

To the Editor,

W.G. Craig presents a nostalgic and nonsensical interpretation of WW1 &
WW2, and I consider his views a disgrace.

There has never been a just war. War is by definition state sanctioned
mass murder for the sadistic purpose of control through the age old
tactic of divide and conquer. There is nothing honorable about war.

The Bush clan, as but one example, has profited from US wars since WW2.
Prescott Bush was booted from Congress for funding both the US and
Germany in WW2.

War is the only significant cause of inflation. www.chrismartenson.com.
The perpetual warfare of the US is destroying the world economy before
our very eyes.

The US war budget is almost twice the world defense budget.

War is what bullies make fools think is right. Two thirds of humans obey
authority blindly. We know this from the Milgram Experiment of 1961,
designed to explain Nazi atrocities. It also explains US atrocities
quite well.

Respectfully,

Bruce Codere
Box 27
Fox Creek, AB
The artical by Justice Craig was informative until the thing about pot was interjected a more appropriate example I think would have been something said on Bill 13 that has been recently introduced, or the on going gag law that the provincial govt. continues to fight... these things not, Pot degrade our way of life and what those soldiers fought for then and now
politicians seem to be out of reach of the law these days, they can do anything they want and with the backing of the I.O.C. they can get us to to anything that they also want that is expediant for the purpose of the day.
dated Oct 19/09:

Reporting from Washington - Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. said today the Obama administration is officially reversing the federal stance on medical marijuana and ordering authorities not to arrest or charge any users and suppliers who conform to state laws.

In guidelines issued today, Justice Department officials are telling prosecutors and federal drug agents that they have more important things to do than to arrest people who obey state laws that allow some use or sale of medical marijuana.

...... states that allow some use of marijuana for medical purposes are Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.

California is unusual in its allowance of dispensaries that sell marijuana and advertise their services.

The Times they are a-changing, Justice Craig.

Was it worth it? Was it worth the death, the maiming, the unending pain? That is a terrible question if posed by someone who lost a son, a husband, or a father at Ortona, on HMCS St. Croix, or in a Lancaster over the Ruhr. Even so, there can be only one answer. Was it worth it? Oh, yes.

By god yes! And they did it to have a free society in Canada. That means that if someone wants get intoxicated, it is none of the states business how they do it or to what extent.

By your logic and reason, Mr justice Wallace, you must agree that with those fine young bodies destroyed in those two great wars, we should not be having laws prohibiting the possession or use of any substance. We should not have laws that impede free speech regardless of the event, and we should have politicians that work to ensure the freedom and protection of all Canadians.

Instead we have a tired old justice that was never in touch with reality for him to lose touch with it. Instead we have insipid, onerous, and extensive laws controlling the very population that was freed in those wars. Instead we have politicians that do not protect the citizens, but the corporations that are merely visiting as they are global rather than national citizens.

Come to think of it, we lost every one of those wars for freedom. I say that because we do not have safety, security, or freedom.

There really is the only one law that we need follow:

ONE: 'You shall have no other gods before Me.'

TWO: 'You shall not make for yourself a carved image--any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.'

THREE: 'You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain.'

FOUR: 'Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.'

FIVE: 'Honor your father and your mother.'

SIX: 'You shall not murder.'

SEVEN: 'You shall not commit adultery.'

EIGHT: 'You shall not steal.'

NINE: 'You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.'

TEN: 'You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor's.'

In other words:
ONE: 'Watch out for shysters.'

TWO: 'don't get suckered by shysters' (it has been said the the dollar sign is a graven image that is worshiped by some)

THREE: 'Don't use foul language.'

FOUR: 'take a day of rest each week.'

FIVE: 'Be respectful of those that bore and raised you.'

SIX: 'No violence.'

SEVEN: 'Once committed, stay true to your word.'

EIGHT: 'Don't steal.'

NINE: 'Don't lie.'

TEN: 'beware the green eye of envy.'

Now if we all lived by those rules, no one would get hurt. We would not have to have a vast library of law books with which the government could find something (anything) to charge you with.
War is NOT the "only signifigant cause of inflation", Bruce. Whoever put that out is grossly mistaken.

Inflation can be caused by many things other than war, or the preparation for one.

Anything which is distributing money to the general public in excess of the collective price values of goods and services for sale to the public in the same period of time can cause inflation.

Inflation is a rise in the quantity of money available to the general public accompanied by a commensurate rise in prices.

If the general public had more money available to it, WITHOUT a commensurate rise in the goods and services prices that money will be used to buy, we'd have "prosperity" instead of "inflation".

But that would never do for politicians who'd sooner see us have "inflation" as a means of keeping us "working" and under control, than the "prosperity" they're sure would lead to our moral ruination.

Nor their backers, nor the bankers of their backers.

It's small wonder we have so many 'pot-heads' and other abusers of mind-altering substances. They're only trying to keep abreast of the crazies we keep electing to control us!
"can't you people just enjoy life without making it artificial."

We are not "you people", we are your sons daughters, fathers, collegues, lawyers, doctors and teachers. We contribute to this great society and deserve the right to choose how to celebrate it.



However, Craig, when he writes here, is simply another writer, controversial and singular topic.

Rarely does he write a piece where he is not on one of his right of centre vendettas. He will use any excuse to get to it in a surreptitious way, drawing in his readers and then hitting them with a sucker punch. The technique is now starting to get boring to the extent where I either do not read it in the first place or, move to the second half of the article to check out his rant of the week.

What he forgets is that it is his generation of judges that moved us from the aftermath of the second world war to where we are now.

What I would like to read from him is a series of pieces from his point of view that move us through his start in the legal system to his retirement years and the changes he feels he made in the system to get us from then to now and what he might want to tell others embarking on a similar career path of how to become more effective in their profession to “save society” from itself.