Clear Full Forecast

City Wrestles With Budget Challenges

By 250 News

Wednesday, November 04, 2009 04:12 AM

Prince George, B.C. - When the City of Prince George develops its budget for next year, don’t expect to see any requests for service enhancements on the books.
The City’s Finance and Audit Committee has already started looking at ways to trim costs at the City as contract agreements with employees are going to boost the operating costs again.
The bill for protective services in the City (Fire and police) is expected to add another 3.8% to the tax bill if staff can’t find cost savings elsewhere.  
Chair of the Finance and Audit Committee Councillor Murry Krause says staff have a big job ahead of them “We’ve asked for them to find a million dollars in cuts. Certainly they’re taking our challenges to them very seriously in trying to assist us in trying to bring this (the budget) within our guidelines.”
Krause says the Committee is trying to trim back for several reasons “Its the economy, its acknowledging people are struggling, very often financially, and so there is isn’t an appetite for tax increases.”
Staff have already come up with some ideas, but in order to keep costs down, Krause says they may have to reduce staff “That is not a pleasant thing, but when your only source of income is land based taxation we know some people in our community are struggling, we’re going to make some really difficult decisions. Nobody wants to see people lose jobs, we want a strong stable workforce and we’ll continue to try and strive for that, but we have a hard budget coming in front of us very soon.”
Committee member, Councillor Cameron Stolz  says City staff had already come up with nearly a million dollars in cost saving ideas, and have provided another million dollars worth of possible savings through suggested service reductions, cost cutting or revenue increasing ideas. Stolz says at this point, there are no plans to cut any existing jobs, but job vacancies may not be filled. He says another idea would look at retirements and not filling those positions. Staff  also suggested reductions to   things like, the flower basket program, banner program and production of a Leisure Services Guide. “They have looked at everything we’re doing right now to see if it is an item we need to maintain, for instance, there is a proposal to reduce the  Council contingency fund by $25 thousand dollars this year.”
But if the City manages to trim enough to keep taxes in line, don’t be surprised to see user fees increase for garbage, sewer and water, all of which are running at a deficit and are supposed to be self sufficient.
The Finance and Audit Committee has a couple of months to hammer out some ideas, the first budget meeting is set for February 8th.

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

"Krause says they may have to reduce staff"

Start with the new communications position. Never should have happened in the first place. A couple of weeks later and the City is crying poverty. That was known all along. Who dropped the ball on this one is still a mystery, sort of.
I know...raise taxes
Put a levy on my taxes...that should help. And buy some new shovels for the city workers to lean on.
With any luck, the councillors will stumble upon some solutions that could save dollars, production of the aforementioned leisure services guide, maybe don't order a hundred thousand calendars for free distribution, maybe don't let the unions hold sway next time a contract comes due for negotiation, give this blog site a day, and I bet some good ideas will come up. Are there any city councillors monitoring this site?
metalman.
I doubt if any of the councillors or the mayor even look at this site. They don't want any input from the working class. They have showed in the first year of the new blood on council that nothing is going to change. Over $100,000.00 for a communications manager and another $45,000.00 for the other person that was hired within the last month for a 6 month term or something ridiculous. There should be a wage freeze instituted the same as most of us have to put up with at this time. There should be no more waste of money for studies and plans for the PAC which I am sure we will be stuck with. The existing R.C.M.P. building should be built onto as it was planned years ago. We should not be purchasing any more property. I could keep going but I think you get the drift.
"There should be a wage freeze instituted the same as most of us have to put up with at this time."

The issue is the out of control power of collective bargaining in BC. Allowing replacement workers means that people will get paid what they should. If we can hire a perfectly good shovel support tech off the street for $12 per hour then we shouldnt have to pay $20. Hard for an idea like this to get traction in a blue collar town like PG. If you are union labour you have no right to complain about the out of control taxation. You get to screw your employer with collective bargaining and they get to screw theirs. Unfortunatley for all of us their employer is the PG taxpayer.
Born in BC, it's way too easy to always blame the unions and unionized workers. Yeah sure, some of them are bums who don't earn their wage or the protections they enjoy as an employee...but the same can easily be said for non-union environments. The fact is, some of the BIGGEST wastes of money from our council continues to be on NON-union and NON-blue collar labour...everything from a new communications manager to that collosal waste of money (over a million bucks a year) IPG. What the hell has IPG ever done for the city except blow smoke up politicians' arses with fabricated stories about how rosy everything is? They cost us a half-million dollars in "revenue guarantees" to Horizon Air by bringing in a plane service that NOBODY wanted, except maybe a dozen or so rich folks in town with relatives in Seattle. IPG is the biggest waste of money in this town. You wanna save a million bucks pronto? Put a lock on those doors. Problem solved, all the sanitation and snow workers get to keep their jobs and our taxes don't go up.
The first thing that needs to be done is clean up Ciy Hall and the start should be with firing Mr Bates and the director of finance. They are leading council down the garden path where there is a complete lack of reality.

Most of the administration is also in competent. Like the first snowfall we had that had melted by noon crews were out plowing and sanding. And the list is endless on the dumb things that they do

The recent hirings that they did are just unbelievable. Not one but two clowns that will never produce an ounce of good for the comunity but give us a pile of crap.
Cheers
And so the anual budget dance and spin starts. Council is out to try and make us believe that they are cutting back and getting tough with spending. Long story short, we are being set up. When it comes to tax increase time they can say that the increase in taxes would have been much more than 4 or 5% if we had not done our job and cut back. My property taxers have increased by more than $6oo in 2 years. Enough already. My pension only goes so far. Not to forget all the indirect taxes we get hit with.Garbage, water, facilities use etc.


Retired is right on target!
I like Tombstones' comments. Personally, I am not bashing union people either, for I are one. If I do any union bashing, it is directed at the organisation, not the members. Most union people I know are decent, might be hard working, and generally go along with what ever settlements are negotiated. The Horizon Air B.S. should never have happened, and I too believe that IPG is a colossal waste of money for this city.
metalman.
Well the solutions proposed are short term and short sighted imo. The real solutions have been bandied about on this many times. I will echo them (although not an exhaustive list):
- PAC
- Bike paths
- snow clearing (wasteful spending aspects; they really need to examine efficiencies)
- New police building
- band aid solutions to ongoing problems with our infrastructure (ROADS!!!!)
- ETC ETC
One great idea I see in the article:
"...there is a proposal to reduce the Council contingency fund by $25 thousand dollars this year.”
I am not exactly sure what this fund is, but when the reports of council spending have been released in the past, I am dumbfounded that they can spend so much above and beyond their salaries! Granted there will be times a councillor will need to attend a municipal related event and that should be covered but lots of room to trim there too! Council should have to make the extra budget item per councillor/mayor public at a regular meeting. They can receive public comment and then vote on it. (Example, trip to China to achieve XYZ...any excess would have to be coughed up by the councillor.) I am not suggesting every item be put to the taxpayer,either, just the unusual ones. Treat it like you would when a youth or community comes forward with a request for funding - case by case.
"...a youth or community comes forward..."

Should have read:
...a youth or community group comes forward...

Sorry for the error.
I'm thinking Retired might be right but instead of Bates, could we not try to get rid of the mayor. Now there is a man on a huge power trip.