Clear Full Forecast

Population Growth in Prince George

By

Monday, December 19, 2005 03:30 AM

During the past few months we have heard a number of people, including local political candidates, tell us about how much of a population growth we are going to see over the next few years. This is of course, a topic of interest to any person operating a business in the region, as this population growth will certainly impact business growth and competition in the future. The problem businesses face is being able to predict with some accuracy just how big the potential growth will likely to be, if there is growth at all. 

Some of the predictions we have heard include the following: the population in Prince George doubling by 2010, all the way up to a population of 200,000 people by 2020. I have even heard a third party comment that Prince George was going to see a population of 300,000 by 2020. No matter which scenario we look at, these predictions are telling us that the population in Prince George is going to grow by at least 80,000 in five years. At the extreme end of the predictions, we are expected to see 220,000 more people living in Prince George over the next fifteen years. 

First lets see what these projections actually represent for actual population growth for Prince George on a yearly basis based on a straight-line growth rate. Using a current population for Prince George of 80,000 people:
1) 80,000 people in 5 years gives us 16,000 people per year. (20% growth per year)
2) 120,000 people in 15 years gives us 8,000 people per year. (10% growth per year)
3) 220,000 people in 15 years gives us 14,667 people per year. (18.3% growth per year)

While these predictions provide interesting coffee shop talk, they should be compared to some historic data in order to provide some benchmarking information. Recent population estimates show that Prince George has seen a population growth rate of almost 1.6% per year (1300 people) over the last two years. We should also note that these past two years have seen significant economic growth in the city and this would certainly be considered representative of future population growth forecasts. For additional comparison, we note that the growth rate in the Fraser-Fort George Regional District over that same time period was almost identical at 1.5% per year. 

Thus, we can ascertain that even the smallest growth rate of 8,000 people in one year, never mind being sustained over a number of years, is highly unlikely. However, if this growth rate was met, there are other issues that would certainly hinder the City of Prince George, such as the following housing issue.

As noted above, the minimum prediction is showing that we are predicting a yearly growth of 8,000 people per year for the next 15 years. This can also be viewed as 2,000 new families moving to Prince George each year, based on an average of four people per household. In other words, Prince George Home Builders will have to build 2,000 new housing units per year in order to keep up with the added demand.
However, since 1991, Prince George has had 4,700 housing units built, of which 500 of those have been constructed in the past 4 years. During the past fourteen years, Prince George has on average seen 337 housing units constructed per year. This includes apartments, single family and multi-family units. During the past four years Prince George has averaged 125 housing units per year. Compare that with the 2,000 units Prince George will require based on the most conservative estimate listed above. We can very quickly see that if Prince George did experience the predicted population growth, tent cities could become part of our skyline. 

So just what can we expect to see for population growth in Prince George? Both economic and population growth in Prince George is generated by natural resource extraction and production, with post secondary education and some tourism thrown in for diversity. However, almost everything done here is a result of working with natural resources. Even our growing tech industry relies heavily on the resource companies for work. It is unlikely that this natural resource dependency is going to change over the next few years, but as we see the continued demand for these resources rise, Prince George will continue to be the service center for the region. This is especially true for the coal, metals, oil and gas industries. 

However, we tend to forget that Northern British Columbia is a very large geographic region with numerous locations for people to settle. This means that Prince George is not always the city of choice for people who are working in areas located outside our immediate vicinity. Thus, Prince George is likely to see a growth rate of 1% to 3% over the next five to ten years, as we continue to be the capital of Northern BC. 

-Myron Gordon owns TMSG Management Services Group, which provides management and financial services to growing businesses. 




Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I thought the latest stats out gave us a population of just over 77,000. I doubt we will see 80,000 for quite some time-as the last report we had lost close to 700.
How does one acquire these figures, and I do not buy the prediction figures unless they are determined by the lower percentages.
I wonder if Myron can enlighten us as to HOW we became titled with that "NORTHERN CAPITAL?"
Did someone grab that out of "la la" land and a few thought, "Oh boy, sounds good?" so that was the initiation?
I kind of think most people consider the ending of the north is here.
We do not seem to be connected with Dawson Creek, Grand Prairie, Fort St John, Tumbler Ridge-as those areas do not relate to us when reference is given to the Northern part of the province. Yes-do not correct me, I know Grande Prairie is in Alberta, but they get a great deal of the business from the other areas stated. It does not come to this so called "NORTHERN CAPITAL."
Prince George seems to be the end of the road, and at times one gets the distinct impression it is a going nowhere city.
I would like to hear some truly "upbeat" announcements for the city-like the proposed ethanol plant produced. Of course it was another upbeat that never materialized.
What can and must happen to really make Prince George a "city?"
First, people must mentally view it as a city? Not a backwoods lumberjack town.
We really do have a ways to go.
Prince George has alot to offer thier is something to do for just about anyone from outdoor adventures to indoor attractions.We are at the center of the resources and have the facilities to process them.Also are houseing prices are relitivly low compared to similar cities.I have no idea what the growth will be but we are doing the best we have for the last 15 years I think are out look is very positive.
I know it is common to criticise Prince George, but I think it is sometimes rather unfair to stress the negatives too much. I arrived in PG in August 1976 and lived there until a year ago, after I retired. I raised my three sons there. They all went through the public education system and all went on to university, one at UNBC.

Prince George may be a small city, but I always felt safe and felt my children were safe. Housing is not too expensive, and most things are available (except for a decent big man's shop).

Prince George is a nice place to live, even with its faults, which are by no means any worse than anywhere else. In fact I miss it, and the people, just not the cold and the snow.
We need to get honest with ourselves and work with what we have, rather than on what we think we have or what we might have. One example is that a lot of people leave Prince George when they retire. Another is a lot of young people leave because they cannot get employment that will sustain them over a long period of time. I have one Son in Calgary, One in Vancouver, and One in Tumbler Ridge. My Daughter is in Prince George, I am sure there are numerous familys in the same situation.

Our Mayor and Real Estate Salesmen, and the usual Chamber of Commerce, business people are the biggest problem because they keep talking about growth that does not take place. Ethanol Plant, Major Meat Packing Plant in Vanderhoof area, Oil in the Nechako Basin, Container Terminal in Prince George. None of these things have any in depth study done on them and are all pie in the sky announcements based on wishful thinking, and the hope to sell a few houses.

Ft St John is in the Heart of the Oil Country their population in 2001 was 16,734 in 2005 it was 17,781. Does oil naturally equate to a larger population ???.

The Mayor does not understand how stat BC can show a reduction of 700 people while housing starts are up and rental units are down. Duh??

In 2001 Prince George had 11000 people between the ages of 15 and 24. That means that today these people would be between 20 and 29. Can we not assume that a large percentage of them moved out of their parents houses, bought older homes, or rented apartments, and that those people who sold there houses either built new or moved out, and Walla' you have a decrease in population, an increase in housing, and a decrease in rentals. At the same time you would have an increase in traffic because a large number of these people would now be driving cars, so it appears that there are more people because there is more traffic. Not true.

We need a major review of facilities for the Elderly so that they will remain in the town. We need to ensure that are taxes on housing is lowered not increased. If I have to pay high taxes, high heating costs, high transportation costs, and freeze my butt in the winter, then I may as well go South.

We are being very professionally conned by our electied politicians, and City staff who are blowing all our tax dollars, when in fact we should be paying down taxes (Like they are doing in Kamloops) and making this city more attractive to all people.

Last but not least we could develop a good tourist industry but we need input from all members of the community, not just those who are on one or another form of Government program where they get paid whether a tourist comes through or not.
Oh, for goodness sakes, Pal, and why do you have to make so much sense???
You must be downright embarrassing to all those talented "spinners."
Of course their tunnel vision does limit them, and many perhaps would develop a tendency to believe their own lies.
I do wish you had answered my question tho'.
How did we acquire the prominent position of being called the NORTHERN CAPITAL???
Thanks anyhow-I do so like "common sense."
IMO Prince George has all the emenities of the big city except one. PG lacks high end high density residential communities that are a must for any urban dweller.

I've talked to a lot of university students from out of town (70% of the students up there) and the thing they miss is the urban lifestyle of the big cities.

IMO we need a zoned area for high density high end residential to attract the immigrant population with money and retain the university student population who may wish to stay when done university. This can not be done downtown because of the safety issues and perceptions, but could be done somewhere safe like Nroth Nechhako and Foothills, or along the Cranbrook Hill Crest.

In the short term we have the capacity to create employment for 1000+ families with the new standboard, and pellet flame plants coming to this regional district. This is an opportunity to build momentum.

Momentum can be contagous, and PG is a a place in its development where it can use momentum to create a new perception that fuels a fast developing high end high density residential neighborhood, which in turn is the fuel needed to create a self sustaining growth stage maturing an unmature city into a swan that was previously an ugly duckling.

We in Prince George like big houses with big yards and long driveways, but that is not where our growth clientel will come from. Our future growth will come from apartment and condo dwellers who like to be packed in like sardines IMO.

Time Will Tell

PS my grad class recently had its 10 year reunion and out of 550 grads only 12 still lived in PG. Mostleft because there was no work in PG to keep them here and the future looked bleak. Others left to go to university and never returned.
I've always wondered who does the population projections? It appears to get fairly complicated.

I have a fairly simple method to give me a little clue as to what is going on in PG.

First, I phone my friends at the moving company and ask them if more people are moving back to PG than moving away? If the answer is yes, then I would expect the demand for housing to begin increasing.

If interest rates begin to rise, it's a signal that we better consider refinancing our mortgage or get into the real estate market before interest rates get out of hand.

Do you remember when mortgage rates were closing in on 17%? Early 80's I think.

I question the birth rates at our hospital to determine what our classroom needs will be in 6 years.

I ask myself, why are people moving back to PG? Well, they will only move back here if there are jobs to come back to.

If there are now jobs, the economy must be heating up in PG. This means that there will be more demand for housing & schools.

There will also be a shortage of trades people. (Expand trades program at CNC)

I would also expect that retailers will also see an increase in sales volume. Build more stores.

But, if we have a strike like Telus (sorry, Lock- Out) or Teachers strike. everything comes to a halt.

If people are unsure of their future income, they suspend their spending habits.

So, inspite of a booming economy, the strikes recently stopped our economy in it's tracks.

When people resume their old spending habits and patterns, the economy takes off again.

When people rush into the real estate market because they feel they will be left behind, they are just driving the prices up because of the demand they are creating.

When you see signs at the Tim Hortons drive through, with 1-800 phone numnber offering to purchase your home, any size, any price, you know you are now in a real estate frenzy.

BC is the most prosperous province in the country. We have resources that should provide for us up very nicely.

But, between the natives, unions, environmentalists and our government, we can create our own obstacles.
Chester