Mounties in Pacific Region Source of Most Complaints
By 250 News
Wednesday, December 30, 2009 04:22 AM
Prince George, B.C.- The RCMP in the Pacific region, (which includes B.C.’s “E” Division and the Yukon’s “M” Division) registered the most complaints over a given year.
The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP, (CPC) has released its report on the number of complaints lodged in 2008 that were followed to completion by July of 2009. The CPC cannot say how many complaints may have actually been lodged with the RCMP during 2008 which may not have reached a conclusion before the July 2009 deadline and expects other final reports will continue to be filed well into 2010.
Based on the information received within the timeframe, the CPC has been advised there were 2,375 complaints lodged, but only 1,829 had reached a conclusion. That means, 23% of the complaints lodged in 2008 were still outstanding at the time the report was written.
The Pacific Region had the most complaints (814) representing 45% of the total. That is not to say there were more issues in “E” or “M” Divisions, rather this is the area with the largest number of members. The 814 complaints included 942 allegations.
The Northwest Region had 692 complaints (38%); the Central Region had 64 (3%); and the Atlantic Region had 259 (14%). Although the number of completed complaints received by the Commission increased in 2008; the distribution throughout the Regions remained consistent from the previous year.
From a regional perspective, the Pacific Region issued a Final Report in 39% of the cases, down from 41% in 2007 and also marginally below the Force average. Of the 942 allegations made, the ones most likely to be disposed of in this manner were "Improper Search of Premises" and "Improper Use of Force". However, when looking at the allegations that were supported and unsupported, it was discovered that only 8% of the total 925 allegations were supported. These supported allegations were most likely to be related to "Improper Attitude" (14% supported) and "Neglect of Duty" (10% supported); while allegations relating to "Improper Use of Firearms" (100% unsupported), "Driving Irregularity" (100% unsupported), "Mishandling of Property" (100% unsupported), and "Improper Use of Force" (99% unsupported) were most likely to be unsupported.
The Pacific region complaints were more likely to be lodged with the CPC than with the Mounties as 77% of the complaints were lodged with the CPC, and only 23% were lodged with the RCMP. In the Northwest, 60% of the complaints were lodged with the CPC, Central region saw 61% of the complaints were lodged with the CPC , and in the Atlantic region, 60% of complaints were lodged with the CPC.
The top three types of complaints in the Pacific region are:
1. Neglect of Duty 30%
2. Improper attitude 22%
3. Improper Use of force 12%
The report notes there are some problems with the final records sent to the Complaints Commission. Occasionally, the final reports were incomplete in that some documents were missing. The good news is that only 4% of the Pacific Region reports were considered incomplete compared to other regions.
The report also includes an examination of repeat complaints against the same member, however the CPC saysthat information is difficult to properly track as the same complaint may have been laid by a person who has made repeat complaints against the force. The CPC recommends the RCMP implement a national program whereby multiple complaints will be utilized as an "early warning" of potential conduct-related concerns with individual RCMP members.
The report makes eleven other recommendations, including:
- Implementation of a proper data base to track public complaints so the Commission can accurately determine when complaints were lodged, how many have been lodged and where, the members involved and the nature of the complaint.
- Some clarification on what constitutes “serious allegations” and when it is appropriate to informally resolve improper use of force complaints and when it is not and
- Clarity on when it is appropriate to accept a withdrawal of a complaint of serious allegations and that the reasons for the withdrawal be clearly documented.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home