School Closures Top List of School Board Meeting Agenda for Tonight
By 250 News
Tuesday, January 26, 2010 04:00 AM
Prince George, BC.- Tonight , School District 57’s Board of Education will meet at Vanier Hall to discuss the 42 recommendations put forth in the plan to balance the budget.
The School District is facing a shortfall of just over $7 million dollars. The plan to deal with that shortfall includes the closure of eleven schools in the District, and the reconfiguration of three others.
Hardest hit would be the rural schools as there are 7 on the list for possible closure. While each District has its own issues, two others in the region have spared swinging the axe on rural schools.
In Quesnel, there are similar issues as School District 28 has dropped 2,000 students over eleven years. Currently the District has 3750 students, but expects enrolment to continue to decline until it levels off at 3100. “How do we in conscience close a rural school when the savings are so minimal?” asks Board Chair Carolyn Neilson. Her School District made a decision at the beginning of the School year not to close any schools within the foreseeable future. “The reason is, in Quesnel, the schools where we could realize some savings are in town, and those are relatively full. The schools that have more space where perhaps closing would make sense, it doesn’t because of the way the funding is handed out.” She says they are allowed an extra $100 thousand dollars per school if the school is a certain distance away from the School Board office. “ All of the schools in our District that are in the half full stage are outside that limit, so we get extra money a year for those.” When coupled with closure costs and bussing students elsewhere, it simply doesn’t make sense to close those rural schools.
To the north, in School District 59 - South Peace, Superintendent Kathy Sawchuk says there is a commitment to keeping the rural schools open if at all possible. “If there are 45 students, they are guaranteed three teachers” says Sawchuk, “We are hearing people want to keep their schools intact, but we may have to rethink how we offer the education, or we may not be able to offer the scope and breadth of programming the child is entitled to.” She is an advocate of rethinking the school concept especially in a world where technology has become part of the daily lives of students “Education may not need to be the schoolhouse we are used to, perhaps it is time to rethink how we deliver education”.
Sawchuk says in her opinion there is one key element that must be first and foremost “At the centre of this conversation has to be the needs of the child.”
School District 57’s meeting this evening is slated to start at 6:00 p.m., one hour earlier than is the normal start of a Board meeting.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
Here they are considering closing schools that are full.
Here they are considering amalgamating an Immersion program from schools that are full and vibrant, to a school that is unsafe for elementary school kids.
They haven't told us how much it would cost to retrofit that school, and how it would be possible to do that between the end of June and beginning of September. What are the costs? I would bet anything that they are greater than the cost of keeping these programs where they are.
The "sustainability" report is chock-full of short-sighted, poor planning. I can see if a school is half full, or if the building should be condemned. But a full school? I just don't get it.