Clear Full Forecast

Gaming Centre Review Clears Air

By 250 News

Monday, April 12, 2010 08:00 PM

Prince George, B.C.-  Prince George City Council has received the official review of the construction of the Chances Bingo Parkade.
 
The review was  approved by City Council  with the hope it would lay to rest  questions about the development of the project and the City's involvement
 
The review provided answers to several concerns that had been raised about the project:
 
·        City purchased the property for $1.29 million dollars
·        Otter Properties paid $1.2 million for the “air space” ( did not purchase actual land)
·        Documents show the full amount of the purchase price was held in trust by the City’s solicitor April 11 of 2007, but was not transferred  to the City until August of that year because of several factors:
o   City needed to close a lane to create one parcel
o   Neither party totally familiar with intricacies of creating new airspace parcels
o   Buildings needed to be demolished to create air space parcels
o   Demolition revealed environmental issues that had to be dealt with
·        Otter Properties and the City split the cost of environmental cleanup of the parkade site ($70 thousand each)
·        Otter Properties paid $800 thousand to demolish and remove existing buildings from site
·        Restrictive covenant placed on property that called for townhouse development to be built within 2 years or City could buy the residential portion of the site back for $1.

·        When asked why the City had not exercised its option to buy back the property when townhouses were not built, the answer was that it did not want to “pull the trigger” as the City has been negotiating with other parties and wanted a higher density building on the    site. The covenant has been transferred to the new owner of the gaming centre

·        City was to construct underground parkade (estimated cost was $4 million) the money from the downtown parking reserve and the downtown development  fund would be used for this construction. The parkade to become a City capital asset
·        Otter Properties constructed the parkade for the City as part of the overall development project. ( that is why the construction of the parkade did not go to open tender)
·        Otter Properties announced it would drop the maximum the City would be responsible for from $4 million to $3 million (actual cost came in at $4.85 million)
·        The question about whether the City needed a parkade was not clearly answered. The parkade’s average utilization rate was 16% during the first 6 months it was available, to a high of 65% during the last 6 months of 2009
 
The information  reviewed  came from more than 1000 pages of  e-mails, a bankers box  full of documents and a CD with  Council meeting minutes.
 
The  reviewer, Jane Neumann of Deloitte says the only item out of the  ordinary she could see from the information provided was the failure to build the townhouses.  
 
Councillor Brian Skakun  had further questions he wanted answered, about the cost of  heating the parkade,  the  funds paid for streetscape improvements  and the total cost of the environmental  clean up of the  site before the parkade could be  built.
 
Neumann said she had met with Councillor Brian Skakun and the Mayor before the review was started and those questions were not  brought up,  so they were not included in the scope of the review.
 
She  fell short of  saying the City got a good deal on the cost of the parkade,  saying only that  the cost of the parkade was $1.9 million less than estimated.  
 
Councillor Munoz interpreted the lack of  use of the parkade as meaning the construction of that facility benefitted  private business more than the City. Councillor Don Bassermann took exception to that, saying  initially the  City was to only have 20% of the parkade for  monthly rentals with the Gamaing Centre having access to the rest.  He adds now that the City has full  access to the parkade it benefits  a number of  facilities in the downtown,  Civic as well as commercial.
 
Neumann concludes that  she could  find  nothing untoward in the  City's involvement  in the  sale or construction of the Gaming Centre and the parkade.
 
Councilor Murry Krause says this report  is a vindication of concerns  surrounding the  construction of the parkade and Gaming Centre "As one of the Councillors who supported this development, I continue to do so.  I believe the investment was worth it and we will have the benefit  for  a long time."
 
Mayor Dan Rogers says the work done by Jane Neumann shows there was nothing untoward in this  project, "The intent of this scope of work was to review the processes and to respond to some of the concerns Council  had and the community had about whether the processes were fair and conducted in a highly professional manner.  I think the questions posed  and were responded to by Ms Neuman  clearly answer that.  Any  suggestion either  direct or indirect that something untoward  has occurred here  is totally false and wrong."
 

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

At least the "gaming centre" has clear air!
There is NO clear air in PG!
New owners of the "air space" portion of the lot is progressing well with the renovations. The outside is being worked on now.
This should have been a wholly private investment. A lot of city dollars tied up in a private enterprise deal. I don't think it was money well spent at all. That money could have fixed our roads and parks and done a lot of things in other parts of the city where home owners are expected to pay yearly increases in their home taxes.

I look at the money the city put down towards the deal and figure all the private enterprise has to do is get the financing with the city portion counting as their downpayment... not a lot of risk for the private enterprise and all the up side. Why the city wouldn't exercise their option to buy back for $1 and negotiate from that position is beyond my comprehension.

This is nothing short of subsidizing picked winners with public dollars IMO and the city priorities of scarce resources are pissed away into someones development dreams at the expense of other priorities the home owner tax payers of this city would find greater benefits and utility if the priorities were open and transparent at city hall.

The city needs to get out of the land development business and leave that to the private sector. The city role is to approve developments through zoning and not to finance the deals. My home tax dollars should go towards things directly related to my home like roads, sewer (which I don't get), water, parks, and the administration of city functions... not real estate speculation and developments.

I don't like it one bit. Its the insider boys club at its worst IMO.