Clear Full Forecast

Heritage Signs Going Up, George Street Canopies To Come Down

By 250 News

Monday, April 12, 2010 07:45 PM

Sample of a Heritage Sign that will be placed in  the City
 
Prince George, B.C.-  The Mayor’s Task force for Better Downtown has a new name.
Council has approved changing the name to “The Downtown Partnership”.
 
That was one 5 recommendations presented to City Council this evening.
Council was also asked to bring back a Community Gardens Policy, and to continue the community garden project at the 7th and Victoria site for 2010.
 
Council has also approved producing and placing Downtown Heritage Places signs at the following locations:
1. The Prince George Arena on 6th Avenue between Quebec Street and Dominion Street;
2. City Hall;
3. The Connaught Hill Ski Jump;
4. The Shasta Café on George Street between 3rd Avenue and 4th Avenue;
5. Mason’s Café at 3rd Avenue and Dominion Street;
6. The Strand Theatre at 3rd Avenue and Dominion Street;
7. The Post Office at 3rd Avenue and Quebec Street;
8. WD West Studios on 3rd Avenue between Brunswick Street and Quebec Street;
9. Northern Hardware at 3rd Avenue and Brunswick Street;
10. The Knox United Church at 5th Avenue and Brunswick Street;
11. Kresge’s at 3rd Avenue and Brunswick Street;
12. The Old Liquor Store at 6th Avenue and Dominion Street; and
13. The Corless House on 4th Avenue between Quebec Street and Dominion Street.
 
 
Council was also asked to create a new bylaw that will replace the one which allowed for the construction of canopies in the downtown. Most canopies on Third Avenue were removed a few years ago when Third Avenue was upgraded. The request before Council called for the removal of remaining canopies on George Street. The initial cost of the work is estimated to be $61 thousand dollars and the City has no budget for this item.  Once a more detailed  estimate for the work  is ready,  the money for the work  could come from the Downtown Initiatives fund. 
 
Mayor Rogers says removal of the canopies is a priority with the Task Force which wants to be "action oriented." The canopy in front of the Northern is not impacted by this move.  It was installed by the Northern's owners and was not part of the  bylaw in 1973 which established the canopies on  other buildings.
 
In 1973, when the canopies were first put in place, the price tag for installation was $310 thousand and the lifespan of the canopies was said to be 20 years.
 
Never missing an opportunity to make a play on words, Councillor Garth Frizzell commented "Our offing of the awnings is in the offing".
 

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Finally getting rid of the shelter.
Danny boy is so obsessed with downtown, he is determined to tear it all down and start over
Time to remove the canopies from Spruceland and Parkwood as well.

Those who think shoppers might want to be protected from the elements obviously must come from another planet.
I bet those signs cost the TAX PAYERS a lot of money.
It's a priority that we get rid of Dano!
Dumb
Dumb
Dumb

PG IS A WINTER CITY.
WE HAVE 6 MONTHS OF WINTER AND 4 MONTHS OF NOT SO SH!TTY WEATHER.

HAVE THESE BONEHEADS EVEN BEEN TO PG OUTSIDE OF SUMMER?

The downtown task force is supposed to be spearheading the "revitalization" of the downtown. IMO this is the exact opposite.
Wonder why previous councils could not clue into the fact a dozen or more signs posted at strategic locations downtown would be the keystone to revitalization and the cleanup of the city core. Here's to Dan and his cohorts for such a grand idea. For the cost of a few signs downtown has been revitalized and saved us taxpayers millions. Just think, with the money saved the city can pickup a few more derelict pieces of downtown property and develop even more community gardens.
cry babies the bunch of you
Rumour has it that the Ramada was pushing for the canopy removal so that people will gather around their hotel when it snows/rains.

Of course, the province has also told the City that if they get the PG Hotel property as a gift, they want them to remove the canopy in front of their new building because they do not want people gathering in front of their building.
Winter city. Time to get serious about that and promote the idea that new buildings add arcades to the pedestrian level as they do at places such as Whistler and Sun Peaks as well as many European cities. Those folks knew/know that as people walk in areas where buildings line the streets it provides a more hospitable and safer environment for the pedestrians.

We have one such building - the Scotia building. Should have a wider walkway.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/melaniejo/2142403381/sizes/o
I really feel that the community gardens on Strathcona are a good idea. I feel the community gardens at 7th & Victoria have already become an eyesore. Especially with the chain link fencing. Right on a main drag like Victoria. Would it not be nice to avoid that type of fencing and come up with something a little more eye pleasing so to speak. I am not saying that community gardens are not a good idea, I'm just saying "Can we make it more attractive"? Any ideas?
Actually I am going to be bold and say that community gardens of a temporary nature like that are an eyesore in the centre of the city from my point of view.

People who visit are not exactly stupid.

I would not mind if we had a nice park downtown and there were some community gardens in it, even with some better looking, as yoiu say, security fences. The Millar subdivision residents are looking for a greenbelt along the uncompleted Patricia Boulevard extension. I think that would be an appropriate location for some more permanent community gardens if that were ever to become a reality.

Also, pocket parks adjacent to some residential buildings could be used for that.
You know, if there were some explanatory sign at a location like that, I would even accept it. it is not as if that is a normal use of such a high visibility site as you say it is.

However, if it were to tell a story of why it is being done, how it helps the community, etc. then people both from in town as well as visitors will more likely say to themselves that it is a great idea and that they are glad to live in such a thoughtful community or, if they are visitors, would it not be nice if their community did that.

Explanations can go a long way to change perceptions.
Some good ideas, gus. Thanks for that....