The True Cost Of Tax Increases In Prince George
By Ben Meisner
Thursday, May 13, 2010 03:45 AM
If you really want to know just how much your taxes have gone up in the past year, there is a very simple way to calculate that figure.
How much money did the city spend last year, how much are they spending this year? In 2009 the city collected $69.8 million, this year $73.4 million. That is $ 3.6 million more than last year or 5.30%. Forget all the figures you have been handed by the city and how the break down occurs.
The city taxpayers are heavy industry, light industry, business and residential, we are all in it together, so if one side, in this case heavy industry, gets a break someone else is paying for it.
By the way the province is set to stop the practice of hitting heavy industry in a community and this city has been getting more in this department that many other cities in BC. They simply had to reduce that figure and will continue that practice in the coming years or they will have the province do it for them. A number of successful lawsuits have taken place in which industry has argued successfully that they are paying too much of the tax share.
The taxes in Prince George have risen 9.7% in the past two years with spending up from $66.8 million in 2008 to $73.4 million this year. Of course you should also factor in the increased costs for sewer water and garbage to come up with a true figure. When those costs are added to the mix the increase in the cost to obtain services in this city has risen in the teens in the past two years.
There is room for improvement.
I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s’ opinion.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
For all the extra's they should be funded by a sin tax, carbon tax, sales tax, casino tax or what ever, but it shouldn't come out of the pockets of home owners who are held hostage to the yearly taxation whims of the city.
I think municipal taxation should at least attempt to reflect fairness for services rendered and not a robin hood system of redistribution of wealth via captive home ownership taxation.
AIMHO