Clear Full Forecast

Report from Parliament's Hill - July 15th, 2010

By Prince George - Peace River M.P. Jay Hill

Thursday, July 15, 2010 03:45 AM

The Senate was STILL sitting this week in Ottawa.  As I mentioned last week, Senators were working to pass important and time-sensitive Government legislation, most significantly, our Jobs and Growth Budget 2010, Bill C-9.
 
This second phase of our Conservative Government’s economic action plan received Royal Assent on Monday to become law after a very robust debate in the Red Chamber.  Eight other pieces of legislation have also received Royal Assent since the House of Commons sitting ended in late June.
 
This included our legislation to end pardons for sex offenders like Karla Homolka.  And legislation that will better prevent the manipulation of our immigration and refugee system with bogus claims while enhancing fairness for genuine refugees, also became law.
 
The Canada-Columbia Free Trade Agreement also passed, thereby providing greater access to a market of 45 million people to Canadian farmers and exporters of paper products and heavy equipment, among other goods.
 
Other laws receiving Royal Assent included legislation that will help First Nations move forward with commercial developments, and amendments to enhance access to Employment Insurance benefits by our soldiers and their families. 
 
Interestingly, the Senate passed 17 Government bills in this session of the 40th Parliament, whereas the House of Commons passed 11.  I am hopeful that when Parliament returns in September that Members of Parliament in the opposition will have spent the summer listening to Canadians and their overwhelming desire to see other important legislation passed, including vital justice reforms.
 
Speaking of Royal Assent ceremonies, which are usually conducted by the Governor General, Her Majesty the Queen announced last week that David Johnston will be Canada’s next Governor General.  Mr. Johnston will commence his new role when Michaëlle Jean’s four-year term ends this Fall and she assumes her appointment as the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Special Envoy to Haiti.
 
This is the first time a Governor General has been chosen following a robust consultation process.  Any past consultations have been ad hoc.  Yet, recognizing the significant and non-partisan role the Governor General fills as the Crown’s representative in Canada, Prime Minister Stephen Harper appointed an expert advisory committee to lead an unprecedented national consultation effort to provide recommendations on who should be Canada’s next Governor General.
 
The advisory committee engaged in extensive consultations across the country, meeting with leading constitutional experts, past and current political leaders, and other distinguished Canadians before providing the Prime Minister with its confidential recommendations.
 
Mr. Johnston is not yet a household name (he soon will be) but he enjoys the respect and support of a broad range of Canadians in every region of the country, among political parties of all stripes, and in government and academic circles.
 
He currently serves as President and Vice-Chancellor of the University of Waterloo.  He has a long and distinguished academic career and a strong record of public service. He has extensive legal expertise and


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

You did it again, Jay, acting as a conduit for your boss's propaganda.
How about a mention of that bloated "budget" bill; hundreds of pages of items unrelated to the budget just so they could all fall under the umbrella of a matter of confidence. If the Liberals and NDP ever get their acts together you won't be able to get away with such travesties of democracy.
We have to get rid of this group of pirates if we are to restore any semblance of democracy in Canada.

I'm SummerSoul and this is just SummerSoul's opinion.
While I am not liking the alternatives,there is no doubt we need an election!
The Harper clowns are out of control!
At the very least,Steven harper needs to be gone!
The little voices in his head get louder every day!
We have far too many politicians who ceased earning their inflated salaries a long time ago!
Time to start over!
Time to start over with the new Liberal Democratic Party of Canada.
A "Liberal Democratic Party of Canada"? That's an oxymoron if ever there was one, Prince George. Combining a group who've long abandoned 'liberalism' with one whose 'new democracy' is only democratic, so I've been told, behind closed doors.

Come to think of it, we've never really had much success electing people by label.

The Reform Party, that once was going to reform Ottawa, got reformed itself by Ottawa as soon as it got down there.

The Greens would probably act more like reds if they ever got in.

Our Conservatives, when they were supposed to be Progressive as well, were neither. And now they're just regressive, every chance they get.

And the Bloc, which wants to break the country up into TWO countries, Quebec and Canada, often acts more effectively ~ like we'd expect a national official Opposition should act in the interests of ONE country ~ than either the Liberals and NDP do. Witness when the mega-monied Bronfmans wanted to move a sizeable part of their fortune out of Canada, to some tax haven somewhere, tax-free (after Revenue Canada, in an advance ruling, said such a move would be taxable), and then Finance Minister Paul Martin overturned that ruling. Only the Bloc questioned that decision. The other Opposition parties all acted like they'd come down with lock-jaw.

Even good old Social Credit, back when it was on the stage Federally, finally split into two groups that eventually both abandoned everything they were once for.

Why don't we get rid of Party labels altogether, just elect the best person in each riding to be your 'representative', and let them put a government together once they get to Ottawa? All we really lack in our ability to do that is an effective 'sanction' that forces those elected to be what they're supposed to be. OUR 'representatives'.

Agreed. The party system must die. We don't get democracy by electing 4 year dictators.
A Liberal Democratic party is not such a far fetched idea. It would definitely relegate the present minority to the side lines, for a long time.

Contrary to what the leaders admit to the media talks have been going on for quite a while, with Broadbent playing an important role.

We shouldn't get rid of party labels and basically it is not practicable. To get elected one needs volunteers and donations from contributors who need to know what they are supporting, like the basic political philosophy of the candidate.

How many candidates would there be on the ballot? Fifty? A hundred? Two hundred? How would these people demonstrate to the voting public why one should vote for one and not the other?

How would one know who the "best" candidate is in a riding? Best compared to who? And how would those "best" candidates once elected get together in Ottawa to act responsibly?

It would be an even greater circus than the four ring circus we are enjoying now.

It would be a free-for-all, bedlam and chair throwing.

Maybe, Prince George, maybe not. Right now, virtually all the existing, noticeable Parties subscribe to exactly the same Philosophy and Policy. The only differences amongst them is in their Method of approach to implementing it.

And so our ballot is just about as meaningful on election day as having a vote in a beauty contest. And largely as predictable.

Suppose, though, and this is only one means of possibly correcting that, that we had "None of the Above" printed at the bottom of the list of candidates on every ballot, with a place for your "x" beside it, and countable as a vote.

This gives the voter a 'sanction'. If he's displeased with the POLICY offered by ALL those on the ballot, he doesn't have to hold his nose and choose what he believes will be the least odious method of implementing it, by selecting a candidate from the list he's been presented. He can register his disapproval. Meaningfully.

In my opinion, this would force those running for office to actually try to find out what the people in their riding really want from their government, and explain how he is going to try to get it for them. Coupled with Recall, to hold the annointed him or her to their electoral committments, it could be a means of breaking the ongoing corruptness of the present Party system.
yes socredible sooooo true we NEED a "None of the Above" selection on the ballot!!!!!\
I more than aggree since the last 3 times i have voted there was no one worthy and noone i trusted