Clear Full Forecast

Backlog Results in Another Case Being Tossed

By 250 News

Monday, September 20, 2010 03:59 AM

Prince George, B.C.- The crisis facing the Provincial Courts in B.C. has been stressed once more in a decision that tossed out a charge.  This time it was a charge of speeding against a truck driver.
The charge carried a fine of 196 dollars, but the accused challenged the matter because it took a year and a half to bring the matter before a Provincial Court Judge.
In his decision to stay the charges, Judge O’Byrne ruled the delays were not the result of anyone doing “anything out of the ordinary.”   He noted that when a ticket is written, the accused then has 30 days to respond. He says it is reasonable to expect that the Crown should be able to be prepared to head to court much faster than what has happened “This is a traffic ticket.  It is not very difficult at all, and this is a matter where it should be able to be prepared, ready to go within 30 days very possibly.”
In his decision , Justice O’Byrne  pointed at the lack of resources as one of the reasons for the delay in this and other cases.  “The institutional resources here in the Cariboo Northeast are of unique circumstances, and I am uniquely aware of them because I am the administrative judge for the Provincial Court here in the Cariboo Northeast District.  The Cariboo Northeast District is an area slightly geographically larger than France.  It has 20 court locations.  It has 11 full‑time judges and one senior part‑time judge.  The demands upon our resources are, as in other places in this province, quite heavy.”
Justice O’Byrne blames the provincial government for failing to act “ For example, in Cranbrook recently, the government failed to appoint a judge, even though they knew for a year the judges were retiring and there have been stays of proceedings there because cases took too long. “
O’Byrne is not the first to bring the shortage of judges to the attention of the government. Last December, Provincial Court Judge  Brecknall, in the case Regina versus Richard Zagwyn  last December which reads, in part,  “The failure of the government to act has now imposed a crisis upon the Cariboo Northeast District.  Simply put, without additional appointments, the Cariboo Northeast District no longer has sufficient judicial resources in Prince George to meet the caseload.  Matters have been scheduled from January through September 2010 on the basis of a complement of five full‑time judges and one part‑time senior judge.  With the reduction of one full‑time judge, the remaining judges cannot hear all of the existing cases .”
Justice  O'Byrne  noted that in  2005/2006  there were 143 judges serving the entire Provincial Court in B.C..  That number is down to  124.5  for 2010-2011 at a time when the number of cases is growing.
When Opinion 250 pressed  Attrorney General Mike de Jong about the court crisis last week, he said his ministry is “acutely aware of the need, and doing what we can to meet that need”.
The real issue may be one of budgeting, as de Jong pointed out at the time that the “court” is more than the judge, “it is the clerks, it is the sheriffs, it is all of the support personnel that are an integral part of allowing a court to operate so when we make the appointments (judicial) and there are more to be made in the coming days and weeks, we have to be mindful of the fact that we also need to provide those support services.” 
De Jong says these have been challenging budgetary times, although his ministry did receive a small budgetary lift.

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Just another case where theres not enough
money. Try hitting the cronic bad guys, thieves, drug dealing low lifes and such, a little harder, take all their possessions and have a giant auction. Leave the poor working man alone.
Agreed
increase the highway speed limit.some years ago ,in a car and driver magazine a few years ago a qestion was asked ''if you didnt know how fast you were driving,how fast would you drive'' they were trying to find out at what speed the average driver would drive before they felt it was unsafe-answer-72MPH
AT what speed do you think the tickets average.
Great plan......allow people who can't really drive well in the first place to go faster.

Right on Roadking......
oh-forgot -raise the driving age to 25 years old-get thies stupid kids/drunks/and smagheads off the road-ever drive in Germany.if you every want to drive fast here ,turn on your radar dector and follow some one with a N of L on the back off the car .keep a prudent distance behind them.winner winner chicken dinner-drive safely dosent mean slow.
So according to Roadking, everyone under 25 with a driving license is a "stupid kid/drunk or smaghead." Interesting. How about the 55 year olds, or 60 year olds that drive at half the speed limit in the passing lane? Or any number of driving irritants.
I also agree gar!
Conduct the following experiment: Drive from here to Cache Creek at the posted speed limit (when safe to do so) plus 5 to 8 clicks in case the speedometer isn't right on!

Then watch the fun!
Hey sunshine there's no such thing as a passing lane. The speed limit in the left lane is still the same as the right lane. I also agree Gar, this nothing but a cash cow from this famous government. Communist B.C.! If they really gave a shite these drinking and driving laws would have been across Canada
There's nothing wrong with an 18 month wait for a traffic ticket. The reason it takes so long for traffic violations to be heard in court is because they need to receive enough contested tickets to justify having the police officer appear in court. A traffic cop is not going to show up (most of the time) if it's either his day off or he's only going to be in court for 15 minutes.
There are indeed passing lanes! Signs that say *Passing Lane in so many kilometers* alert you to their existence.
What really works, give all the once who want to pass you room ,so they can pass you anywhere anytime, makes for a more relaxed drive for you and at the same Time count all the Roadside Crosses of the once who could not wait!
This is about delays by the Crown to hear a speeding ticket case. I do not have the faintest clue what the driver's case was, because it was never heard.

Why was it not heard?

The dispute was posted and the court date was set and sent out 10 months after. That date was 3 months after the notice was sent out.

He was out of the country on the date, requested a new date which was accepted and set for 3 months later again and again without consultation.

This prompted the driver to file under the Charter of Rights.

The three month periods are normal and within reason, in my opinion, for setting of dates.

In my opinion, the original 10 month delay for response likely had nothing to do with availability of court time but had a lot to do with errors at the offices of the Crown which could be as simple as misplacing the dispute information. I understand that happens. The system depends on numbers being properly entered, and when human error enters into that at various stages, such situations happen.
If the work man crosses that line over where it is legal or illegal, then they fall into the same category as drug dealers, and so-called low lifes. They are criminals.

That's why the lady of justice holding the scales is blindfolded.

And for argument's sake, define working man? Does that include women as well?
2 working men = 1 working woman ... :-)

1 drug dealer = 1 working person
I always wondered how the lady of justice who is blindfolded can see the evidence in front of her?
18 months is ludicrous. These judges sit on the bench 4 hours a day. They don't know what a working day is. Any paper work or reading should be done during a 'spare' like teachers or at home like teachers; then they could put in 8 hours and the backlog would be zero. When society has it's standards set by a few, those few will work the least.