Clear Full Forecast

South Fort Children Least Prepared for Kindergarten

By 250 News

Wednesday, September 22, 2010 04:14 AM

Click on map  for more detailed  visual of this and other maps from the study.
 
Prince George, B.C.- A  new study by Human Early Learning Partnership (HELP), at UBC, indicates close to a third of kindergarten students are behind in key areas when starting school and too many never catch up.  What is even more startling, is that children from the neighbourhoods of South Fort George in Prince George, and Chilliwack North are listed as being the most “vulnerable” that is,  being behind their  classmates in one or more  of five key areas.
 
Those five key areas make up the Early Development Instrument which measures kindergarten children for their levels of development in  language, communications, social, physical and emotional health. The results are tabulated not by the schools they attend, but from the neighbourhoods they call home.
 
In the 53 of 59 school districts that provided data in 2009/10, 30.3 % of kindergarten children were vulnerable, up from 28.5 % in those same districts last year.  In South Fort George, the level of vulnerability is 62.8% this neighbourhood also had the highest proportion of children vulnerable  with one in every two children falling below the development mark in one or more of the 5 key areas.
 
“Since we started tracking the progress of B.C. children 10 years ago, we can clearly demonstrate that child vulnerability is trending upwards,” said Dr. Clyde Hertzman, Director of HELP, Canada Research Chair in Population Health and Human Development and Professor in the School of Population and Public Health at UBC.
 
“Anything more than 10 percent is avoidable under optimal conditions of early childhood so about two-thirds of the developmental vulnerabilities that B.C. children currently experience as they start school is preventable.”
 
Key Findings in Prince George:
 
College Heights had the lowest level of vulnerability of all of the neighbourhoods (11.9%). It was the only neighbourhood with less than 15% vulnerability in Prince George in 08/09.
The largest decrease in vulnerability was in College Heights.
There were also decreases of greater than 5% in McKenzie, Ospika North and Peden Hill.
Ospika South had over 43% of children vulnerable on at least one scale of development.
The largest increases in vulnerability were in Shady Valley and Heritage.
Overall, four neighbourhoods had increases of greater than 5% 
 
“There is a great deal of neighbourhood inequality in children's development in part, to family and neighbourhood socioeconomic factors, but also to things that are not directly related to incomes such as access to quality early learning and care programs,” explained Hertzman.
 
The data helps government and communities guide policies, programs and services for children and parents based on each community's identified strengths and needs.

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Education, education, education.

If you want your children to excel, they need to learn from examples. If your a dead beat parent, guess what, the toddlers and pre kindergarten kids are not going to know any better.

Parents need to do their part, it is not the states responsibility to give all the education and experiences to our children.
Amen to that.
Family environment has everything to do with how a kid learns!
This is a direct result of the destruction of the family unit. We live in a society where we can't afford to raise children properly, but, everyone wants kids. Nothing can replace a full time, at home parent. Mom or Dad it doesn't matter, someone has to be at home with them. Unfortunately, there are a lot of folks who truly can't afford to have someone stay home. What is worse is that those that can afford to, don't because we are in generation get it, a new TV is more important that your child wellbeing.
The maps linked to above are actually from the first year of "wave 4" of the study. The last page summarized all four "waves".

I looked at the longer 10 year period to come up with the 10 year average for each neighbourhood that the children come from and the consistency of the data over that time.

Here is the result for the 10 year average in order of least to most vulnerable:

Hart Highlands 18.3
Heritage 20.2
Shady Valley 20.7
College Heights 22.7
Mud River 24.0
Pineview/Hixon 28.7
Mackenzie 29.1
Ospika South 31.5
Peden Hill 31.7
Bowl 34.6
Ospika North 37.2
South Fort George 54.1

Here is the result for consistency of data from most consistent to least consistent using standard deviation as the measure:

Shady Valley 4.54
Mud River 4.59
Ospika North 5.86
Hart Highlands 5.96
South Fort George 6.62
Pineview/Hixon 7.16
Bowl 7.21
Heritage 8.23
College Heights 8.92
Peden Hill 10.36
Ospika South 11.53
Mackenzie 15.72

Porter, while I agree in part with your statement, I think a large percentage of the families have working parents no matter what income group they come from. They also all have some sort of system to take care of their children if they choose or have to go back to work let us say within the first year of the child's birth, whether that is another family member, a friend, or some paid child care worker or facility. Some are obviously better than others.

From my point of view I see an expected pattern in the above list(s) - generally speaking a pattern of inner city versus outer ring suburban/rural.
BTW, the little inset map in the upper right hand corner shows a very graphic picture of the state vulnerability with respect to the five categories.

It is pretty consistent in all of them that the far northwest sector of the bowl to the south of the Nechako and the rural areas to the north and west are the least vulnerable.
sorry, upper left hand corner for the map insert ... :-)
Maybe the people who have nannies can get them to read this to let them know how valuable they are.