Clear Full Forecast

Skakun Trial Hears from Investigator

By 250 News

Wednesday, October 27, 2010 04:00 AM

Prince George, B.C.- The trial of  Prince George City Councillor Brian Skakun resumes this morning having heard from the  RCMP Inspector  who investigated the breach of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

Inspector Raymond Noble says he was  called by  North District  Chief Superintendent Barry Clark  to  head up the investigation, and  his first meeting was with  City  Manager Derek Bates.   He said  he thought Bates was being “coy” about  the investigation “I had the feeling he knew more than what he was telling me” testified Noble.  The Inspector says  he soon  realized  Bates didn’t want to plant  any information, he wanted Noble to  reach his own conclusions about  how  the confidential Heller report had  found its way on to the CBC website. 

Noble  told the court  the document which was leaked was labelled  “Attachment #4”  a designation  given to  that document for a specific  closed meeting of Council.  He says he asked the City Manager  who had access to that meeting agenda and  the  various attachments.  It was then that a list of  names was  developed of people who  had access to that particular version of the report.   

Noble told the court he started with interviews with those who attended the meeting, and Councillor Brian Skakun became the prime suspect following his interview with Councillor Deborah Munoz.  He testified she informed  him that Skakun had confessed to her  that  he was the one who  had  leaked the document.  She had also  told  Mayor Colin Kinsley,  City Manager Derek Bates and fellow Councillor Murry Krause  about  Skakun’s alleged confession. 

Inspector Noble  says   he interviewed  the Mayor,  members of Council who attended the meeting,  the  city clerk,  some department managers and others, and all  seemed to feel  very uncomfortable talking about a document they  believed was  confidential.  He said  most told him they  didn’t feel  comfortable with a police investigation because they were worried it would embarrass the City and open  old wounds. 

Inspector Noble says he requested an interview with Brian Skakun, but  that interview never happened. 

The Heller  report  examined the relationship between the  head of the local RCMP detachment and the manager of the civilians who worked at that detachment.  The report is alleged to have concluded the romantic relationship put the  two in a conflict of interest.  Councillor Skakun is accused of leaking the report to a CBC reporter.  A copy of  “Attachment #4 “ was posted  for a short time on the CBC website.  

The Crown is  expected to call  another 17 witnesses, including Councillor Debora Munoz.  The trial will  carry on through the balance of this week,  and resume December 7th.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Skakun should do the right thing and resign; how can there be any cohesion at City Council if they all have to testify against each other for something he admits he did?

He can let the voters decide whether he should be in Council in the next election, but meanwhile he should step down.
WASTE OF TIME...

Sounds like the "head of the local RCMP detachment" (and we know who THAT was) got caught with his hand in the cookie jar... and he didn't like it.

Wonder if that has anything to do with wasting taxpayers money on this 2 week trial.

The lead investigator never interviewed the prime suspect? Is that normal?
I think Brian Skakun has been one of the best councilers ,we have ever had, he has some guts is a brave brave man. I think he is being stabbed in the back. How many other Councilers and Mayors have stepped over the line and its been hidden ?? Why would we want him to resign?? There is going to be a lot of dirty laundry going to come out in this court case. Sorry skeptikl I disagree with you , sounds like you are one of the gut kickers.
I said it before and I'll say it again. This whole thing stinks. The Province is the investigating body for this act, and it usually does not fall into the RCMP's jurisdiction. The RCMP have more important investigations to assign Inspectors to.

Why would C/Supt Clarke get his nose into it? Conspiracy theorists would presume that there is a link between the old Superintendent (you know who) and the North District Commander. I personally believe one asked the other to look into it in order to feather his own cap or get revenge. This should be explored by Skakum's lawyer.
This is only just begining. A little early for anyone to draw any conclusions. Brian has been faithful to those who voted for him and he has done quite a bit of muckraking throughout his term. This muckraking involved people who for years were allowed to get away with some pretty sneaky dealings. As a result of this, many who have a great deal to lose push back to maintain their ability to continue their previously rewarding behaviour. Look for some very interesting testimony during the defences turn to ask questions. Councilor Munoz might just have personal reasons for doing what she is doing. Time will tell.
I think Imorge has it right.
I think this case could get real dirty, one has to wonder is politics worth it?