Cluculz Lake Voters Say NO to Boosting Taxes for Improved Fire Protection
By 250 News
Sunday, November 07, 2010 11:49 AM
Cluculz Lake, B.C. - The referendum that asked residents of the Cluculz Lake area if they would pay more to have a new, more comprehensive fire protection service has been defeated.
The final vote had 93 in favour and 115 opposed to increasing their taxes by 75 cents per thousand of assessment to improve the fire protection services.
The upgrade would have included fire prevention, fire suppression, first response to medical
emergencies, road rescue (excluding extrication) and ice water rescue.
The upgrades would have meant each property owner would see their tax bill jump from 11 cents per $1 thousand of assessment, to 85 cents per $1 thousand of assessment.
So, a property assessed at $200 thousand dollars would go from $22 dollars, to $170.
The increase would have been offset somewhat by reductions in insurance policies.
The Regional District said the newer firefighting equipment and fire hall additions as well as additional training and gear were needed to provide the Cluculz Lake Volunteer Fire Department the tools necessary to increase its service levels to that of a regional district fire department.
If voters had decided in favour of the service there would have been several improvements:
· a newer fire truck would be purchased
· an addition would be built onto the existing Cluculz Lake Fire Hall to make it a full size two bay fire hall, able to house two fire trucks in a heated hall so water tanks do not have to be drained in winter, thereby improving response time.
· a single bay satellite fire hall would have been built on the south side of Cluculz Lake to house one of the existing fire trucks and enough gear for 3 to 5 firefighters, so that response time to that area can be improved.
· sufficient funds to provide for operating costs and an appropriate level of training.
The Regional District of Bulkley Nechako anticipated this level of fire protection service would have been classed as “semi-protected” for insurance purposes and may have resulted in reduced insurance premiums.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home