Clear Full Forecast

The Mantra of Kevin Falcon and the BC Liberals

By Peter Ewart

Tuesday, December 07, 2010 03:45 AM

By Peter Ewart

 
One of the mantras that gets repeated a lot these days is that the "private sector" always does things better than the "public sector".
 
Kevin Falcon was saying just that on the Meisner Show on December 6. According to him, the sale of BC Rail was justified because CN Rail would do a "better job" than the publicly owned rail company, adding that "government is not particularly adept at running businesses".
 
However, the problem with repeating mantras like this is that oftentimes reality can become obscured and history ends up getting revised.
 
Has it been the case that the private sector has always "done it better" in regards to crown corporations like BC Rail and BC Hydro? Take for example BC Rail. History shows that, in fact, the private sector was incapable of building the provincial railway. Various attempts were made in the early part of the Twentieth Century. All failed.
 
It was only after government stepped in that the railway was actually built. Contrary to what Mr. Falcon is alleging, the governments of that time did a much better job than the private sector in building a railway - one that was key to the development of the province as we know it.
 
Over a span of decades, BC Rail expanded its operations and developed a wealth of expertise in operating a railway in the difficult climactic and geographic conditions of the BC interior. It was considered by many to be a jewel in the crown of the province. This was despite the fact that its operations and budgets were frequently interfered with and undermined by various politicians.
 
One of the allegations made by defence lawyers in the recent BC Rail corruption trial was that the Liberal government went out of its way to undermine the publicly-owned company so as to justify its sale to the giant U.S. company, CN Rail. And there are not a few things to back up that claim, including the cloud of misinformation that was generated over the railway's finances.
 
But there is another irony here also. CN Rail, which is now owned by a giant U.S. private monopoly, was itself once publicly owned - by the Canadian government. How did CN Rail originally come about? Back in the period between 1918 and 1923, many people believed that another national railway was needed (the other national railway, i.e. CP Rail, was a privately-owned monopoly). 
 
However, many of the private companies that made up a potential national rail network had gone bankrupt, i.e., they were incapable of even being a part of another national railway, let alone building one. It was only when the federal government stepped in that CN Rail, a publicly-owned, national railway network came into being.
 
Despite the fact that the private CP Rail monopoly had been granted the best routes along with prize real estate and other perks, CN Rail operated successfully for over 70 years, playing a big role in the opening up of the West, as well as northern and eastern parts of the country. Although it was forced to "run money-losing lines and ... provide all kinds of unprofitable services", the railway actually made a profit in 11 out of 15 of the years between 1978 to 1992.
 
However, in 1995, the federal Liberal government sold off CN Rail to American investors in what author Harry Bruce termed "the Mother of All Sales" and was the biggest IPO ($2.2 billion) in Canadian history (see "The Pig That Flew"). Not reported in the establishment press of that time was that U.S. financial experts saw this sell-off as "the Mother of all Deals" and a huge windfall. In a word, it was a "gift" to foreign investors, much as the sale of BC Rail was a "gift" also.
 
So this is how it works. Governments of previous generations, using the public treasury, do all the heavy lifting and all the massive investment to get both CN Rail and BC Rail operational. During this time, the "private sector" sits on its hands on the sidelines.
 
But once the railways have been operational for some decades and become coveted investment "jewels", this same "private sector" that was incapable of building the railways in the past, now steps up to the plate to buy them at bargain basement prices. They, of course, are assisted by a modern generation of politicians who never miss an opportunity to spout the mantra that the "private sector always does it better than the public sector". 
 
And, so it has come to pass, that two great publicly-owned railways in Canada, built with the people's money, have been scooped up by foreign financiers. History will not be kind to the crew of politicians who let this happen. 
 
Indeed, more and more information is coming out that certain modern-day politicians in a number of countries have used underhanded methods to foster disinformation, deliberately de-valuing and destabilizing publicly owned assets and utilities in order to sell them off to foreign financiers.
 
There is a word for that, and no mantra can drown it out.
 
Peter Ewart is a writer and columnist based in Prince George, British Columbia. He can be reached at: peter.ewart@shaw.ca
 

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Kevin who?
Word I've heard is the best investment one can make is in a privatized public asset or function... often they come with a built in monopoly and therefore guaranteed price maker for profits... the least risky of all investments.

Assets that have monopoly markets are almost always better for society as public entities, because then all stakeholders get a say in how they are utilized for the greater public good.

Monopoly assets under government control are what protect and ensure a vibrant private sector free enterprise market place. Without that protection in place all associated industry become vertical in its ownership and control, and the sustainability of a diverse economic base is surrendered to the greed of monopoly capitalists.

All to often these days finance comes along with debt based capital and uses the leverage of funny money to take control of strategic assets that can be used to harvest greed level profits in the name of capitalism... ignoring the many stakeholders and factors in society that make their business model profitable in the first place. A form of corporate welfare not easily recognized, because it doesn't show up on the financial statements in anything other than ownership of profits.
Bang on Peter!
Peter that the same is happening with the Independent Power Producers. The mantra being private sector can do it better , but, the big but, build it with subsidies, taxpayers money.
The miners in CHILE would be entombed and dead if the Government hadn't stepped up to the plate.
Falcon better do some research, before he spouts off.
Can you say "Bilderburg"?
If Kevin Falcon were to win the leadership of the Liberal party and we were dumb enough to vote those same Liberals back in,we would have gained nothing.
Zip.
We would be right where we were a month ago.
I refuse to believe we are that stupid.
But....
Is he going to privatize ICBC?
Is he going to privatize ICBC?
I've never understood the logic when politicians like Falcon say things like that. Governments are no less complex than a business, in fact, they are probably more complex when you consider the significance of their mandate (business plan), their customer base (entire population) and their operations (more diverse than ANY business you could name). How then, could the private sector do something better than the public sector when that same private sector would have no experience whatsoever in administering something as complex as a Provincial Government?

Furthermore, by suggesting that the public sector is incapable of such feats, Falcon is essentially saying that he as Premier (CEO if you will), is also incapable of managing such an organization (business). Wow, there's a vote of confidence for the guy! What leadership and what vision. Lost in this is the fact that he's also indirecting telling every single employee in his organization that he has no faith in them either. Can you imagine the CEO of the Royal Bank getting up at the annual shareholders meeting and saying publicly that all of his employees are incompetent fools that can't manage their operations? Not only would he look like a complete ass, but the stock value of the bank would crash. When a politician wanting to be premier says something like this, is it any wonder then that people have little to no faith in regards to what the government does? It shouldn't be surprising, he's basically endorsing that view!

I don't know about you, but I'm sick of politicians who proclaim they will represent us on one hand (and take the pay and pensions to go along with it) and on the other hand, they chop of the legs of the people who actually do the work.

The first politician who comes out and says that they believe the government CAN operate as effectively as any large organization and they will work to ensure that occurs, gets my vote. We need people who are willing to look at our government as an institution that can lead and serve our needs, not people who see the government as an institution that is just there to serve their own political career aspirations. It seems we have many of the latter and not so many of the former. True leadership and vision in our political system is dead.
Lots of hipocritical comments here. If government runs such a tight ship, why all the complaining about how the city is run?
Lots of overpaid people delivering poor services. When was the last time you saw an exhausted postal worker. AirCanada cost taxpayers billions before it was sold. CN as well, It was a plodding crown corp, with high costs and poor service. These were not well run companies, like VIA rail today they struggle with profits and poor servise.

One thing they all had in common, was militant unions that held Canadians hostage
regularly extorting settlements well beyond the private sector.

Peter is correct in that they came about through necessity as our country was being built and the private sector was unable to build the infastructure. But the model of governments owning and running all these diverse businesses today dosen't work. That dosen't mean everything should run by the private sector, But did BC really need to have a monopoly on liquor sales? Did Petro Canada need to be competing with 50 other private taxpaying corporations, whose tax dollars were subsidising their competitor. Not really.
Peter is incorrect when he says they were sold off to foreign interests at bargain prices. It took years for many people to recoup the initial investment(CN was the best one) in many of the big crowns and there has very specific ownership restrictions on every government IPO. After 20 years and several mergers CN is only recently over 50% owned outside of Canada.











Grand Theft Railroad...

I was working for the Canadian National Railways in those days before it went for sale and changed it's name to CN. It was crisis capitalism in slow motion...

A series of track force rationalizations (read lay-offs), technological changes, degraded plant structure, staggered weekends off; all in preparation to make the sale look appealing.

If I were to sell a capital asset eg a car, would I flatten the tires before the guy comes to look at it, or would I be wise to wash and wax it, maybe change the oil and service the battery to enhance saleability?

I was made redundant (layed-off) after 9 years of service, 8 of which I held "permanent seniority". For what? To make Wall Street shareholders rich?

Yip Harburg said it best in his song, Brother, Can You Spare a Dime. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eih67rlGNhU

Canadians built a railroad, made it run... a National Dream... now it's sold...

Once you sell an asset, it's gone, gone, gone!

Ironically, Yip also wrote Somewhere Over the Rainbow. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhzbzwPNgXA I offers a glimmer of hope...

Work and hope...

Falcon, the new Gordo.
Tisk, tisk. Yes, it is all the fault of the greedy unions. If you believe that you must be a fan of the Fraser Institute and its propaganda-tank clones.
Good union wages used to be the backbone of Prince George's economy.
As to 'exhaused postal workers" (dow7500), when is the last time you saw a real employee of Canada Post? Our mail is delivered to "super" mailboxes by a rotating crew of "contractors" (dare I say "scabs") with no long-term committment to the job. We used to have two real post offices. Now we have cubbyholes in the back of drugstores, staffed with clerks more familiar with selling aspirin than sending a parcel out of town.
The sooner we put the skids under the privatisers, the better.
Now, if the NDP could just get their act together...
Your right sardonic, I am a fan of the Fraser Institute. You got me on the exhausted postal workers though. I would dare say though that it would take more training and knowledge to sell asprin than send a package out of town, which underscores my main point. Unions have driven up costs well above what the job would pay for the education and training required.

In a perfect world everyone would make good money, have lots of benifits, and big pensions. Sadly, this mythical utopia only seems to exist in the public sector and as a taxpayer I'm sick of it. This city is a prime example.