Clear Full Forecast

Munoz Says Skakun Thought About Dying

By 250 News

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 05:52 PM

Prince George, B.C.- When Councillor Brian Skakun visited Councillor Debora Munoz at her workplace on September 12th of 2008, Munoz has testified “He was nervous, agitated and in distress.”
 
Munoz was testifying at Skakun’s trial for the unauthorized release of the Kitty Heller report, a report that dealt with allegations against two City employees. Skakun is accused of breaching the Freedom of Information and protection of Privacy Act in releasing the report to the CBC.
 
Munoz says Skakun met her for coffee, and told her he had “handed over the report to the CBC, but had not intended for the report to be published. He felt terrible and thought about dying, but added he was just the messenger and believed he was doing the right thing because the public had a right to know.”
 
Munoz said she worried about his safety and tried to steer the conversation into making sure he knew that “everyone makes mistakes, and that he should discuss this with his fiancé.” She told the Court she told Skakun to think about his son, and his family.
Munoz went on to say Skakun advised her he was protected by a section of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act because the public had a right to know.
 
“I was most concerned about his statement that he thought about dying and I focused on that.”
 
She says after Skakun left, she wrote notes about their conversation “I took notes because I didn’t feel comfortable as the bearer of that information”.
 
Munoz says she “lived in a state of anguish for three months not knowing what to do with it (the information). Who do I go to?”   She says she knew she had to disclose this to someone, and went back to Councillor Skakun “I said why don’t you just come clean, admit what you did?” According to Munoz, Skakun said his lawyer had advised him not to admit to anything, and that Skakun said to her “if you want it that way, its your word against mine.” She testified she felt threatened by that comment, and that’s when she decided to go to Councillor Murry Krause for advice and he offered to set up a meeting for Munoz with the Mayor and the City Manager.
 
She would meet with former Mayor Colin Kinsley and City Manager Derek Bates on November 21st.
 
Earlier in the day, Bates testified that although there was pressure from the City on the Attorney General’s office to launch an investigation, he did not come forward with Munoz’s revelation until an investigator asked him about it in March of 2009. He said he had two meetings with the investigator, the first to lay the groundwork for the investigation, and Bates knew he would be the last person interviewed and that was when he revealed Ms. Munoz’s statement. He says he wanted the investigator to be “unfettered in his investigation and I would be the last person interviewed and would forward that information at that time.”
 
Also on the stand today, via video conference, was Anne Bailey. She is one of the managers who was alleged to have harassed  two staff members. Bailey said the leaking of portions of the Heller report in April of 2008 caused her a great deal of embarrassment.   Although the report cleared her, saying none of the allegations could be substantiated, she says the media reports were very upsetting. Defence Counsel  suggested the publishing of the full report on the CBC “gave you vindication because the allegations were proven unfounded” Bailey said  “I felt vindicated when I saw the report at the City of Prince George behind closed doors, I didn’t like it being back in the press”.
 
The trial continues tomorrow morning with the cross examination of Debora Munoz.

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I quote from the Citizen. Bailey resigned from her position four years before she qualified for retirement because of the grief she suffered when the report was made public. She successfully won an undisclosed amount of compensation from the city as a result. How much compensation did she get?? or are we not allowed to know?? was it our tax dollars ? This is one gutsy lady , looks like a win win situation for her.Skakun will take the fall.
There was a nasty little spat in North Saanich this week when two newly elected councillors balked at being asked to swear an oath that included a promise not to divulge council secrets discussed behind closed doors. The rookies saw this as an attempt to intimidate and gag them, as the no-telling-secrets section, which carries the warning that any councillor who blabs may be held liable, was only added to the oath last week.

Here's what the oath really should say: "I promise not to discuss in secret anything that should properly be debated in public, which is pretty much everything. If caught breaking that promise, I will knock on the door of every constituent and personally apologize for betraying their trust. It's their government, not mine."

There is more of this article at the following link:

http://www.timescolonist.com/news/Government+should+open+hiding+behind+veil+secrecy/3895927/story.html
I also think Munoz did not have to disclose all of her conversation with Skakun , the leak was one thing but telling the rest of the story was sad.If any of it is true?? its he said she said.
So, it all comes down to:
Munoz word(s) against Mr.Skakun and because Munoz is backed by Bates, Kinsley and all the current councilors plus mayor, her words are more trustworthy than Mr. Skakun's ?
What a corrupt world we are living,
the truth can not be told!
The sad thing is, all the city emloyees want the whistleblower out and silenced.
Is that, because every one of them has
some "butter" on their head? What other
explanation is there ?











ummm - how about he could be guilty..... pull your head out of your a**. Lose the conspiracy theory. Really, Skanun is a saint and everyone else is corrupt? Somewhat far reaching......
Yup, he is a skapegoat!
Released the document. Nothing else matters except the waste of money and court time. GUILTY ! Pay the $50 fine !
If Skakun is found guilty of giving this information to the CBC the maximum fine is $2000.00 and no criminal record.

This is not a big deal. It would appear that he pleaded not guilty in order to get a trial and get some information out to the public.

We shall see what transpires.
Brian will probably be advised to step down as a councilor, next time around he can run again if that happens. It's sad that we are spending a truck full of money on this trial when it's a misdemeanor and the only person tarnished is in the RCMP.
I heard threw the grapevine that Munoz and Sakun were dating at the time this happened
Politics is a very dirty business.
Boon, why do you dislike Brian S. so much??Should he fear you??