Clear Full Forecast

Distracted Driving Campaign Catches Thousands Using Hand Held Devices

By 250 News

Wednesday, March 02, 2011 11:51 AM

 
Vancouver, BC - More than 3,000 people  were  caught using electronic devices during the RCMP and IntegratedRroad Safety Unit crackdown last month.
 
“From a policing perspective it is disappointing to see the numbers that high,” explains Superintendent Mike Diack, “E” Division Traffic Services. “Last year, distracted driving was a contributing factor in 104 collision fatalities in British Columbia. As police we hope that people realize that their actions can affect those around them and adjust their behavior accordingly, in this case not using hand held devices while behind the wheel.”
 
Superintendent Diack says police officers have heard a wide range of excuses from people justifying using hand held electronic devices, primarily phones. These include: “I was just on my way to the mall to buy a blue tooth”, “I was just telling my husband to call back later because I’m driving”, and “I thought I might miss an important call.”
 
“Whatever people may say there is simply no excuse, except calling for emergency assistance, to be using hand held electronic devices while driving. The excuses won’t mean anything if you are involved in a collision that seriously injures or kills somebody because you made a phone call or sent a text message,” says Supt Diack.
 
Inspector Eric Brewer, Officer in Charge of North District Traffic Services,  commented, “Clearly attention was brought back to Distracted Driving and the inherent dangers involved in this activity, while operating a vehicle.  It reminded people of this illegal activity and it highlighted the fact we are seeing the overall crash picture shift towards more and more crashes being caused due to Distracted driving.  I would suggest overall yes it was successful by doing exactly what it was supposed to, educate the public.”
Over the span of the campaign  members across the North District wrote 501 tickets for talking or texting on a cell phone.   In the Prince George area, a total of 77 charges were laid.
 
The numbers for the North District, which encompasses everything north of 100 Mile House may seem low.  But, when compared  to the Lower Mainland District, where they issued 3038 charges, it is important to consider the population variance; 2.6 million in the Lower Mainland versus 334,000 for the north. The numbers suggest the problem is serious in the  region especially  since there are  areas where there is little or no cell service.

As an offshoot to the Distracted Driving issue, North District noted a high volume of people not wearing their seatbelts. In the Prince George area alone, 238 charges were issued for not wearing seat belts, using child restraints or booster seats. Overall across the District, 1006 violations for seatbelt non- compliance were issued.  Eleven of the  violaations  were for 
either no booster seat or for not having a child properly restrained or not restrained at all.
 
The fine for using an electronic device without hands-free while driving is $167.  In addition, drivers may receive 3 Driver Penalty Points (DPP) if they are caught emailing or texting.

Drivers in the Graduated Licensing Program (GLP) are not permitted to use any prescribed electronic device at all, even if it is hands-free.  GLP drivers will receive the $167 fine and 3 DPP for violating the Distracted Driving Legislation.

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

“Last year, distracted driving was a contributing factor in 104 collision fatalities"
Isn't that absolutely disgusting?
People still think they can drive and play at the same time. Oh, can't miss that call!
Oh, I don't have a problem, I'm good at multitasking.
Hope the ones that lived feel the pain of the ones who didn't.
The amount of the fine is a joke! The minimum should be 500 bucks + HST. Just driving around town here one can see them using their cellphones all the time. They use the right hand while holding the thing against their ear, thinking that holding it against the left ear is too visible.

Four out of five are women ... as far as I have seen.

I see more men driving and on their cell phones.

but does it really matter which sex is doing it more?!? it is illegal and I totally agree with a higher fine and points against their licences as well, and maybe higher insurance premiums
And whos' brainstorm was it to put TVs in cars?
Charge them with impaired driving and all the fines that go with it, especially if there is a death. Impound their car and treat them like the criminals they are.
LOL the tv's aren't for the drivers!
The fine and points are definitely not severe enough..especially for new drivers...
No, you are right, it does not matter whether they are women or men, it's just something I observed. I have also seen some drivers texting while the kids were strapped in their child seats in the back...
Oh come on leave the poor phone users alone ...go after those that pick their noses when driving ...that is a distraction that affects us all...icky
interesting time for this article to come out, with our snowy narrowed streets... I was cut off today buy someone who slid through a stop sign and almost sideswiped by someone who wandered across the road (assumedly because there were no visible road lines to keep them on the road)
Neither of these people were on the phone, just terrible drivers with no idea where their vehicle was in relationship to the world...
Can I add something to the pile? A bit off topic but it's regarding driving distractions.

How about the idiots (and I'm being polite) who drive their vehicles with a dog on their lap.

On Monday I saw a guy driving by the hospital in a white Explorer with a small poodle type dog on his lap, with his window wide open so the dog could stick it's head outside. Seriously, I thought somebody was filming another Jackass movie.

First off, if that guy got in an accident, setting off his airbag, his dog would become pooch paté. Second, you'd think he would know the wind chill on the dog's face might not be a good idea. Third, I'm quite sure that a dog on your lap is terrible driving distraction. How do you explain that one to the police when you run over a pedestrian. "Sorry officer I didn't see him/her because Mr Muggles was giving me kisses".
Driver education must teach that driving is a very single minded activity. You cannot do anything but concentrate on driving, period. It is a full attention activity. Your life and the lives of all others using our roads depend on that. Maybe ICBC should do some spot commercials on the lead up to distracted driving accidents and include any and all distractions and what they can lead to.