Clear Full Forecast

First Toe-To-Toe For Federal Leaders

By 250 News

Tuesday, April 12, 2011 06:14 PM

Prince George, B.C. - As the pundits say, the federal election campaign is off-and-running...

The first leadership debate, in English, has wrapped up.  Stephen Harper, Jack Layton, Michael Ignatieff, and Gilles Duceppe faced off on a total of six questions posed, via videotape, from Canadians across the country covering the hot button issues like the economy, health-care, and crime.

Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, held to his focus throughout of calling on Canadians to give his Conservative party a majority government in the May 2nd election.  "If we have a minority government, my fear is we will go through a 5th election and a 6th election," said Harper.  "I think, at some point, Canadians have to make a decision - we believe we're on the right track, we're asking Canadians for a clear majority so we can get on with the nation's business and focus on the economy."

For Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff the debate was about jets, jails, and corporate tax cuts.  Ignatieff said with the Conservative's $30-billion dollars on new fighter jets, $13-billion dollars on prisons, and $6-billion on unaffordable tax cuts.  "The numbers don't add up, you won't be able to pay for health-care," said Ignatieff.  "You're not telling the truth to the Canadian people, this is about the economy and it's about telling the truth about the choices that you want to foist on the Canadian people.  We need to make better choices."

NDP Leader Jack Layton said the party's health-care platform was the most important reason to vote NDP.  He said both the Conservatives and Liberals are looking down the road to the re-negotiation of the Health Accord with the provinces in 2014.  All three leaders agreed on maintaining a six-percent annual increase in transfer payments after 2014.  But Layton said, "We can't wait until then to start fixing what needs to be fixed - we say let's hire doctors and nurses now for family medicine all over the country, let's make sure that we have homecare - additional homecare - for families that are looking after people and that we get more long-term care beds now for the people who need them, and, finally, take action on prescription drugs to bring those prices down."

Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe used many of his opportunities to remind Harper of comments and promises he made while in Opposition.  Duceppe pointed out that Harper had said it would be "immoral" not to respect decisions made by the House, yet has not done so while in the Prime Minister's Office.  Duceppe also called for more money to go directly to the provinces for health-care funding, saying that's where the expertise lies on how those dollars should be best spent.

Green Party Leader Elizabeth May was not allowed to participate in the televised debate, instead she took part in a simultaneous live video-streamed discussion.

Round two, the French debate, goes tomorrow night.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Why is Duceppe even there? Why is there a single province party allowed in a Federal election? He said several times tonight "...as long as Quebec is a part of Canada..." Its pretty clear what he thinks of the rest of the country and I truly hope he doesnt speak for all of Quebec, otherwise dont let the door hit you on the a**.
I see your point interceptor, but to be honest, when you listen to Duceppe he's probably the most honest "federal" politician out there right now. It's also too bad that he is with the Bloc, because some of their policies are actually pretty reasonable IMHO.

I was completely unimpressed by Harper. The guy is likely the worst debater I have ever seen. I thought Layton and Ignatieff at least had some passion in their tone. Overall, I wasn't really inspired by any of them. Pretty sad when the separatist is the guy I would trust most out of all of them.
Just listened to the debate on CBC and Harper clearly won the hour I listened to. Iggy had trouble formulating a proper sentence and the other 2 were equally a waste of time!
I agree NMG it was a fairly uninspiring debate - although it was great when Layton threw Iggy under the bus for his 70% absentee rate - lol
Uninspiring debate, but Harper took it hands down.
Layton did well for Layton, but too rough around the edges and a poor grasp of the issues.Too much bluster.
He did land a beauty on Iggy about his attendance record!
The major disappointment was Ignatieff.
I expected a better showing.
The guy has a very poor grasp of the issues and comes across as arrogant and smug.
He also cracked under pressure and showed his temper.
A very big mistake!
Harper maintained control and kept his head when he was being ganged up on.
I think he is going to get his majority.
How could he not...we just saw the other options,and they were not pretty.
Interesting link charles.

The more I listen to the Conservatives, the more I get the sense that they are essentially "Republicans North". I think they've simply gone too far to the right to gain my support.

I personally don't think any of the parties deserve a majority, no do I think Canadians will be best served by such an outcome right now. There are too many questions and issues amongst all the parties IMHO that I don't want any of them to have majority power.
NMG, I agree. Harper has absolutely no respect for any other view or opinion, just like he dismisses the whole contempt of parliament issue as opposition game playing.

He rules as a one man show. He looked as if it pained him that he had to be there and participate in the debate, or as he called it: the bickering.

Democracy has gotten little respect from the Harper Government.

Give it five years under a Harper majority and Canada will be barely recognizable. The last vestiges of Canadian democracy will be just a fond memory.
You know, one thing that REALLY bothers me about the Cons (and any party who would have a similar view in a similar situation for that matter) is this notion that even if they are in power in a minority government, they seem to have this view that since they "won the election" that they should have the ultimate say.

To me, this is a complete slap in the face to the notion of representative government. If you are in power in a minority, it also means that the majority of Canadians DID NOT support you in the election. This is not a "win", it's a clear message that the Canadian people want diverse representation in parliament. It's then up to every party to respect those wishes and work together to represent the people. This is a key feature of our political system and I actually think it is an incredibly important and valuable component of our system as it provides an added level of control for the electorate in cases where they are not comfortable with giving a party majority power. The significance of this component of our system should not be discounted IMHO.