Clear Full Forecast

CNC Administration Must Carry the Ball, Not Drop It

By 250 News

Monday, March 13, 2006 02:59 PM

By Jan Mastromatteo


On March 9, the College of New Caledonia announced that it will be cutting 24 instructor positions. Apparently unaware of the irony, the administration made this announcement on the very same day that a forum was being held in the College Atrium which focused on the huge skills shortages that exist in British Columbia. The forum presenters, which included both business and labour, made very clear that there is such a shortage of skilled personnel in the province that many companies cannot carry out their work effectively.

On the same day, the College also announced that the technology programs that it suspended last year would remain suspended, including Wood Technology, Engineering Design Technology, Computer Information Systems, and Electronics Technology (suspended in 2002). In addition, two trades Entry Level Trades Training intakes will be cancelled.

On the other hand, the College administration has announced that it will be starting some mainly short term, entry level, trades programs, but it is unclear whether these are one time or permanent offerings (the one exception is the New Media program which is being reinstated after being suspended for two years). But these “new offerings” cover up the fact that, over the last several years, a number of substantial programs have been eliminated from the range of programs that the college offers. In addition, there have been a substantial reduction of course offerings in the University Transfer area.

Program cuts and layoffs have been taking place at the College for the last four or five years to the extent that many faculty and staff refer to the process as “death by a thousand cuts”. Indeed, several years ago, the College administration even tried (unsuccessfully because of community opposition) to suspend the Forestry Technology program, a move that many saw was sacrilegious and extremely shortsighted, given that Prince George bills itself as the forestry capital of Canada. Last year, 22 instructors received layoff notices (the effects of which were somewhat ameliorated by early retirements and granting of leave to the extent that 8 ended up to be permanent layoffs). Operational staff have had their ranks decimated over the last few years and students have had substantial tuition increases.

The college has made these instructor, staff and program cuts, supposedly to meet what it terms “community demand.” But is there not a danger that the College risks becoming incoherent in its vision of itself and where is it going?

CNC is a comprehensive college which means that it offers a broad and comprehensive range of programs, from trades and technologies to university transfer, business and management, developmental education, health, and social services.

This comprehensive nature is a big asset for the North because it gives students a variety of choices in training and education. For example, in the University Transfer area, students can access at CNC a number of programs that are not available at UNBC or any other institution in the North. These UT courses include Criminology, Human Kinetics, Fine Arts and others.

A perennial issue for a College such as CNC is that the demand for post secondary programs tends to be cyclical. On the one hand, only a few years ago, enrollments in nursing were low, yet today there is a huge demand. And the same can be said about trades and technology. On the other hand, enrollment in university transfer courses and forestry technology used to be relatively high, but in the last several years has dipped.

The big danger in these cycles is for decision-makers to be myopic in their outlook. Slashing a program and laying off instructors and staff may seem to make economic sense in the short term, but in the long term what it ends up meaning is that the North loses a valuable post-secondary asset, often forever. The experience with the Ministry in Victoria has been that once a program is cut, it is very difficult for a college like CNC to get it back even if demand rebounds. Thus we, as a community, lose out.

CNC faces challenges today. The administration has chosen to respond to these challenges by in the main laying off instructors and cutting programs. Such a strategy is a slippery slope. If there are fewer instructors and fewer program offerings, then fewer students will attend the college, and a downward momentum is established that will only lead to more layoffs and cuts. Even more disturbing is that CNC is the only college in BC both this year and last year that is cutting so many jobs.

In today’s world, a successful college administration must be able to balance enrollment and budgetary pressures while maintaining the comprehensive nature of the college and access for students. Not to do so is to drop the ball. And this will only hurt the North. 


Jan Mastromatteo is the President of the CNC Faculty Association

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

There is absolutely nothing which dictates that a college must be comprehensive.

This College, nor any other that I know of in smaller communities, has ever been "comprehensive".

We do not train animal techs, a variety of medical technologists, process technologists, music, pharmacy technician, special ed teacher assistant, resort management, tourism management, legal assistant, arts and entertainment management, retail marketing ..... etc. etc ...

In my opinion true comprehensive colleges can only survive in large urabn areas. In locations such as Prince George one must select programs and excel in them to draw students from the rest of the province.
Why train people from BC when we can bring tradesman in from out of the country to work for peanuts.
What Mastromatteo omits from the argument in comparing CNC to other colleges re: downsizing vs. growing, is that PG was / is unique in that our university was not built out of our existing college... it is a stand-alone university. Accordingly, we didn't get the automatic influx through expansion from certificate / diploma programs to degree granting. Also, much of the colleges former curriculum was attributed to university transfer programs... courses now directly available from UNBC. What we're seeing now is a shift in university transfer programs to other areas such as the trades... though a plumbing program would seem essential and conspicuously absent.

Essentially, I’m simply pointing out that Mastromatteo has a bias in delivering a select perspective… half-truth is no truth at all.
I wish to address some of the comments directed at Jan's article:

1. The person who suggested that colleges are not comprehensive should check the College Act. It states that colleges must offer comprehensive programming.

2. The person who suggested that we can import trades people cheaply needs a lesson in economics. What "cheap" trades people? From where? The shortage is international, and so the price of recruiting trades people will rise everywhere.

3. The person who suggested that the Prince George region is too small to offer a diversity of skills training and education should check similar size areas, Kamloops or Lethbridge for instance. Those communities do not think they are too small. CNC serves a region that extends from Burns Lake to MacKenzie to Blue River to Quesnel; it is not small.

4. People who suggest that university programs should only be offered at the university do not appreciate the importance of VARIETY. Would you suggest that we should have only one car dealership or one media outlet? When there is lack of variety people go elsewhere, whether for a new car or for an education.

5. Some people suggest that programs which lack enough students to be "viable" should be cut. This is instinctively sensible if we can recongize all of the factors that contribute to "viable." Much more than the college budget is at issue: When a program is not offered a studnet seeking those skills - technical or scientific or otherwise, bears the extra cost of leaving the community. Employers bear extra costs of recruitement and retention. Prospective employers will chooses to locate in other communities where they have access to skills they need. These are hidden costs that need to be put on the table. Loss of the wood tecnologies program especially illustrates the importance of checking all costs and benefits from the perspective of the entire comunity.

What we need is better forward planning. When government funding falls short in providing important programs, we need to me able to make our case. Wit-less and unquestioned budget slashing is not an effective solution.
Mr.Idiens,

Thank you for your comments. I have discerned your comments are from a personal knowledge of CNC.

What I didn't see was a series of solutions for our current situation. What would you propose for us? Percy
Very little or no mention here about the 10 to 12 percent decrease in student enrollments in the past five years. Can we assume that this is a trend, and that it will continue. Remember that enrollments in School District 57 have declined by a similiar number over the same period of time. Less people in less people out. Therefore less people to go to CNC or to UNBC. UNBC enrollments have also flatlined or declined in the last 3 to 4 years. They will have a serious problem with recruitment in the next 5 to 10 years.

Is about time that people looked at the population of the Citys/Towns from Hope BC to Prince Rupert, including Kitimat, and you will see that with a few exceptions, these Citys and Towns have been declining in population, and it appears that they will continue to do so for sometime. Wishful thinking, waxing philosophically, star gazing, and hoping for the best will not change what is happening in the Interior. With a limited number of people in such a large area, and with a declining and aging population it is only a matter of time that you would run out of students.. **Do the Math**. Its not like we are in Vancouver where they have Millions of people to draw from.
Percy... "... solution to our problem"? You're assuming there's a problem. What if the staffing and programs are simply realigning with current needs for students vs. job security for academia. In that vein, would you be wanting to look into job security issues?