Clear Full Forecast

Softwood Deal Possible This Year?

By 250 News

Monday, April 03, 2006 04:02 AM

Some encouraging news over the weekend on the softwood dispute from the American Ambassador to Canada.

Despite the fact there was no word of a resolution to the matter coming from the Mexican Summit where Prime Minister Harper and U.S. President George Bush huddled, Ambassador David Wilkins is expressing a  fresh optimism.

The Ambassador  was being interviewed on CTV's Question Period , Sunday and expressed a certain confidence  the  matter can be resolved by "friends".  He also expressed a timeline when he said he had no doubt  Canadians and Americans wanted to "resolve this issue and resolve it this year."

As Prime Minister Harper and President Bush  settled in for their talks on Thursday, speculation there would be a resolution to the dispute meant  gains on the stock market for lumber companies.  Canfor's stock  climbed 3.47% on the T.S.E. Thursday.

Wilkins says that while the leaders didn't  reach any agreement, the summit did provide an opportunity for the two to "gain awareness"  and give the matter a fresh look.

Business analysts however wonder how rapid an agreement can be made as they suggest  there is just as much  disagreement between east and west Canadian producers as there is north and south.  In Canada, the eastern producers want all the duties returned ( about $5 billion worth) but there is speculation producers in the west would be willing to  trade off some of those dollars in exchange for finality.

Prime Minster Harper is expected to meet with  Bush again this June in Washington.
Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

By year end, eh?

The last I can remember, the USA wants to negotiate and Canada wants to settle based on the NAFTA rulings and stay with the NAFTA agreement which encompases trade in lumber and other forest products.

So, there is nothing there that needs 6+ months to come to an agreement. It is simple. Follow NAFTA rules and return the money. NAFTA is finality.

By the end of the year, we will likely have another election and if the matter of softwood trade is still not settled, it will go on for another year.

One thing is obvious, Emerson is turning out to be a prima donna who is useless at the softwood lumber issue table. He did not come with any great revelations to the conservative side of the house, revelations which would see a deal being cut very quickly.

Recall that he was supposed to have had one ready according to some reports.

He is turning out to be high maintenance and a hole in the conservatives' armour.
Since the last outing on this issue we have had a change in government, and it may be that Mr Harper would want to settle the dispute, even if it means a compromise on Canada's previous stand. Harper may agree to a settlement outside the NAFTA rules, and the US may be able to keep some of the money and put on a quota. I hope that any settlement, if one comes, is made for the benefit of Canada and not to enhance any politician's reputation as a negotiator.

As to Emerson, the whole country knows his own constituents have no use for him, so anything he touches will turn to dross.
The softwood lumber dispute will never be settled according to NAFTA if the ruling goes against American wishes.

The USA has the hammer and George knows it - he has other more urgent Middle East priorities.

They openly treat us as if Canada is their retarded cousin.