Clear Full Forecast

Development Concerns Troublesome: One Man's Opinion

By Ben Meisner

Monday, May 29, 2006 03:46 AM

    
 When you constantly hear the same complaints you have to wonder, if there is smoke,  there must be a fire.

Rarely does Opinion 250 go a day without someone asking what we are doing about the problems of development in this city.

Right now, development costs seem to be the high note. The developers arguing that the City fathers are adding more costs to their developments before they begin.

They have a point.  If the developer puts in all the services, paves the roads, builds the sidewalks, then how can they be responsible for future costs?

The taxpayers who buy the homes will pay for garbage, water sewer, schools and even snow removal through their taxes. The city is always crying that it wants more population, then how come it is the developer that is getting the short end of the stick?

Commercial development is worse. 

With the hoops that the developers must go through in order to buy the land, put up a building and then find they have to bow to the City for the kind of landscaping or design. Here again those business are being called upon to bow to the wishes of city hall and the city is arguing it will cost money in the future for them to bring jobs to the city.

Somehow when you hear the arguments, you can’t help but agree with those either developing subdivisions or investing in a new business and building.

Lodge a complaint you say, well,  that's risky.

Most developers will tell you they worry that if they complain, their development will suddenly sink to the bottom of the heap and when you have already invested a half million bucks you tend to swallow hard and give in to what the City wants.

Their commments are made to other investors and other investors will gladly tell you that although Prince George considers itself "business friendly"  it is one of the hardest places in which to do business. 

Why?

I'm Meisner, and that is one man's opinion.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I used to live on the west side of town, but in city limits by about 2 kms.

Well I moved and built a house outside of the city limits by a bit, so I could run my own household, and my business without being told how I must do everything.
Its mush more peaceful now.
Somehow the city feels I still have to buy a City of PG business lic. every year, despite not being in the city limits.
So I humour them and pay the annual tax, errr I mean Lic.
But at least they cannot annoy me 24/7 out here.

another mans opinion.
I used to live on the west side of town, but in city limits by about 2 kms.

Well I moved and built a house outside of the city limits by a bit, so I could run my own household, and my business without being told how I must do everything.
Its mush more peaceful now.
Somehow the city feels I still have to buy a City of PG business lic. every year, despite not being in the city limits.
So I humour them and pay the annual tax, errr I mean Lic.
But at least they cannot annoy me 24/7 out here.

another mans opinion.
The city isn't the only ones. try buying agriculture reserve land for a farm. Its bloody rediculous.

To buy farm land around PG now you have to own an existing farm of no less than 100 acres, and the existing farm has to be within 15KM of the land you wish to purchase. Basically if you want to buy farm land its too bad unless you already own a farm over 100 acres.

If you want to develop crown land for something like an RV park they say its a five year wait until your proposal will see the light of the bureaucrats. Then and only then if you have already paid for native burial assessments, environmental assessments ect ect, at over $100,000 with no guarantee the Crown will sell you the land.

These new farm stipulations make me think Pat Bell was appointed to the Agricultural Lands Ministry to act as a block to agricultural land development in favor of his past portfolio of mineral and mine development. Its the only thing that makes sense considering the facts.
A quick check of the DCC in Kelowna and PG brings up the following results:

For a commercial building in Kelowna the highest charge is in the $7.50 per sf range and the lowest is in the $3.80 range in the downtown.

In PG the spread is much greater, ranging from $14.10 to $0.62. with two areas being around $3.80

So, it appears that PG is discouraging urban sprawl compared to Kelowna.

Such hardships .... wonder what the charges are in Richmond.