Clear Full Forecast

Committee for Sustainable Community Development

By 250 News

Monday, July 10, 2006 07:51 PM

Councilor Debora Munoz  has failed in her effort to have her Prince George Council Colleagues to develop an integrated Community Sustainability plan. 

She envisions a committee of about 21 people working on everything from social, development, environmental and cultural aspects of Prince George. 

Councilor Don Zurowski says while he recognizes the intent of the request, he worries the committee would be cumbersome "Would the effect slow down the decision making process?" asked Zurowski.  He points out there are numerous committees already doing much of the work Councilor Munoz is calling for.  He pointed out the movement for smart growth, the special needs advisory committee, air quality task force, a social plan and $15 million invested in water improvement.

Councilor Don Bassermann says the proposal is problematic in that the committee proposal is too large, and the suggested work puts existing functions in "akward positions".  He suggests the City instead try to identify the groups already doing the work, and find a way to access their information.

Councilor Sherry Sethen would like to have a clear definition of "Sustainability" so those already doing the work have a common definition.

The Mayor says, "If we could come up with a clear meaning for sustainabiity, we could sell it, as it means something different to so many. " 

Councilor Munoz says at the very least,  she would like to see some guiding principles incorporated with the Official Community Plan, but there needs to be a better definition of "sustainability".

The Mayor says "I think  Council agrees that sustainability is a desireable thing, but I think they believe we are already doing it, what we seem to need is an outline of what we are doing, and perhaps come up with some ideas on how to do it better."


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

For those who may have occasion to read the OCP, they might be shocked to learn that words such as "sustainable" and "self-sustaining" community are used on several pages of the document.

So, it appears that we have a city document which uses a word or words with similar roots for which some of the leaders of this city do not know the definition.

page 64 - sustainable employment

page 5 - under the heading "manage growth for the long term" ... build a sustainable community that works both for today and the future .... ensure that short-term decisions complement long term policy direction.

page 6 - as part of a check list "will the decision support the City's commitment to sustainability ...?

So, the City, according to the OCP, is committed to the notion of sustainability, yet no one really knows what the other hand is doing and it appears that there is no agreement on what the word actually means. Where is the leadership? Who is in charge? Who knows what is actually going on?
Owl, your getting up to early in the morning. Your to far ahead of the mandarins at City hall, they sleep all day.

Our only hope is that when Gorgie boy leaves town. Lets hope some dweeb from the planning department does not takes over.

Miesners post earlier give us some idea of how other cities (Winnipeg) use their imagination to solve difficult problems. Unless the tax payers ask for more we will remain in the same rut in the future.

We need new blood within city council. There is a misconception that we need people on council involved in business within our city and thats what they do best is look after those also in business who are not that progressive. They depend on council to help them so its like the blind leadind the blind.

So brace yourself for three more years of the same.

Cheers I'm off to the golf coures.
Owl, your getting up to early in the morning. Your to far ahead of the mandarins at City hall, they sleep all day.

Our only hope is that when Gorgie boy leaves town. Lets hope some dweeb from the planning department does not takes over.

Miesners post earlier give us some idea of how other cities (Winnipeg) use their imagination to solve difficult problems. Unless the tax payers ask for more we will remain in the same rut in the future.

We need new blood within city council. There is a misconception that we need people on council involved in business within our city and thats what they do best is look after those also in business who are not that progressive. They depend on council to help them so its like the blind leadind the blind.

So brace yourself for three more years of the same.

Cheers I'm off to the golf coures.
Sorry I pushed it twice.
Do you do that on the golf course too?

;-)
The only thing that this City Council has sustained and will continue to sustain over the coming years is excessive spending, money mismanagement, over taxation, and fiscal irresponsibility. Other than that whats new.??
Deb is showing her true colors here. Socialist centralist committees that everyone has to go before. You are screwed if you have a different idea than the "committee". After very committee idiot has their "input", you are left with some modified crap project that no one would ever bother with.

The over-cloak proposed is just that. It is intended to stifle, limit and overwhelme proponents looking to build in PG.

The dust bin for this crap idea, along with histories other grand plan NDP ideas.

Boo Hoo to Deb.
Debora Munoz and Brian Scakun are the only two people on council that are capable of coming up with new ideas and a new direction for City Council.

And Owl unfortunatly I only push my drives after I have smelled the roses.
My vote is for a right wing dictatorship! They have shown time and time again that they get things done.
;-)