Clear Full Forecast

Clock Ticking on Softwood Deal

By 250 News

Friday, August 18, 2006 10:45 AM

There  are just a couple of days left before lumber industry players have to let Trade Minister Dasvid Emerson know if they will back the softwood lumber deal.

Emerson  has said he will wait for word from them before making a decision on taking the matter to Parliament.

"Absolutely, this deal will be done,"  That is how John Brink, President of Brink Forest Products describes the Softwood lumber agreement with the US. 

He says the Boards of Directors for the major forest companies have been sent out their ballot and the results will be made available by Monday at the close of business. “It is a done deal" says Brink.

Meantime, speaking about a panel that has been struck to look at the issue of the export of raw logs, Brink says, "I am no fan of the export of raw logs in any manner, but in connection with the soft wood lumber deal, the argument was put forward from private producers that if the export of raw logs does not have any duties attached, then it should hold that the lumber produced from those logs should not also. "

That was part of the Agreement  and the provincial government has given out a short time frame to look at the issue . Brink would rather not see raw logs shipped "I believe that any value that can be added to our wood must be added here, but I also understand it was part of the lumber deal to look at this issue."


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Ah, yes. The internal conflict of governments and corporate interest. Ask the lumber industry players for their approval for the softwood agreement. Of course, don't ask the citizens of the state, they don't matter. What would they know, what rights do they have?

Now that the lumber mills have stock piled thier goods, layoffs will follow. Citizens, mill workers, become the victims of supply and demand, market place economics. Boom and bust, boom and bust, fart, belch, and nod.

It's like hearing them say. Let me take your resources for cheap and I will give you a job, but I didn't say for how long. Oh and by the way, I will sell lumber back to you at hefty open market prices.

There is something seriously wrong with this picture.

Free trade has added a new dimension to the supply and demand principle. It doesn't apply to the citizens of the country, only to big business, and of course governments.

How about a new deal for big business who target our nonrenewable resources, and our utilities. This is the deal. You can take the resources on the condition that they are sold back to the citizens of the province and or the country for cost, and the surplus is yours to put on the stock exchanges at marketplace supply and demand prices. You recieve no welfare grants to make it work. You take the risk like any other business. Take it or leave it. Take it or get out.











A couple of days and Emerson gets to play tyrant!
Well he can try......
Let's just sell our lumber to other countries and when the US finds themselfs having to sleep in caves maybe they will come down to eath and treat their neighbors properly...
probably not though
"Of course, don't ask the citizens of the state, they don't matter."

It's called representative government. We vote, they win, they get to decide on our behalf until it is our turn to vote again.

Problem is the voters suffer from memory loss, or the people running as reps do not always keep their promise. In fact, every now and then they run for one party and then switch to the other party to get to represent the people who voted much more effectively. I think everyone should do that, then we would not have an opposition and things could be run much more effectively.

As I write this, I am wondering why we need over three hundred people sitting in Ottawa and flying back and forth to their homes. I think we should simply give them thir walking papers and get a triumvirate to run the country. Works well in the USA.

;-)