New Report Says Canada Not Tough Enough On Air Quality Issues
By 250 News
Friday, August 25, 2006 09:40 AM
The David Suzuki Foundation has given residents of North Nechako a little more fuel for their air quality battle.
The Foundation has released a report which says Canada’s air quality standards are too low, and estimates air pollution is a contributing factor in 5,900 to 16,000 premature deaths in Canada each year.
The report’s author, David Boyd, says Canada’s limits for sulphur dioxide are a good example;
SO2 limit
Canada 115 parts per billion
European Union 48 parts per billion
Australia 80 parts per billion
It was an excessive release of SO2 from the Marsulex plant in the BCR industrial site in Prince George recently that sent more than a dozen neighbouring sawmill workers to hospital for treatment of eye, skin, nose and throat irritations.
Meantime, the City of Prince George staff continues to gather data on the air quality issues surrounding the asphalt plant complaints raised by residents along the Nechako River. That information includes interviews with all involved, and data from the B.C. Ministry of Environment as well as the Greater Vancouver Regional District.
GVRD is considered to have the most stringent requirements on asphalt plant permits. Comparisons will be made between all existing permit levels and presented to Prince George Council.
It was confirmed last week that Pittman Asphalt had exceeded limits during a stack test. The company has a total of 120 days from season start up to comply with the limits set out in its permit.
While stack emission limits may be met, there is still a concern raised by some residents about the cumulative effects of those emissions. There are three asphalt plants in the same area of the city, and no ambient air quality monitoring in place. So while it may be that each individual plant is operating within the set limit, there is nothing in place to either assess or regulate the cumulative effect of the emissions.
Although the regulations make it clear municipalities have the option to set specific limits for emissions that raises several other questions about who would pay for monitoring and enforcement.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
Accumulated emissions from all 3 would total what? I assume exceeding what is allowable-if one ran over the limit for a period.
When one drives a few miles out of the city-the freshness of the air is decidedly noticeable.
Prince George residents must thrive on air pollution, as there is no clear evidence an honest effort is made to rectify the problem.
Just more studies, and excuses.
When will it be time to "get serious?"
This problem must also be putting pressure on the health system.
Why are they not in the mix to insist on remedies being used-and getting serious about it?
I really cannot see where monitoring it and making the assessments known to the public is the answer.
It is like a sign I once possessed-which read-
"Please do not breathe when I am smoking."
Stupidity reigns.
Either clean it up-or shut up.