Clear Full Forecast

Bridge and Financing Need Updating

By 250 News

Thursday, September 14, 2006 04:00 AM

The matter before Council was a Nechako River Crossing Conceptual plan.

The resolution before Prince George City Council read as follows:

"Moved by Councilor Zurowski, seconded by Councilor Skakun that the issues be referred to Administration for a report on:

a) the cost of replacing the above-pier wooden infrastructure with a single or double land engineered metal structure; and

b) the cost of improving access, egress and capacity to 5th Avenue allowing better utilization of the bridge capacity that is currently in place."    

The motion was defeated. The Mayor and Councilors Scott and Basserman  among the opposed.

This is not a motion that was on the floor at Monday night’s Council meeting which dealt with the Cameron Street Bridge.  It was a motion that was made at a Council meeting November 15th, 2004.  That was a year before the Cameron Street Bridge was closed,  nearly two years before a study (not unlike the one called for in the motion noted above) was delivered to Council.

That night in November of 2004, the Council of the day  instead  agreed  to  go with  the plan for a new superstructure that  would see phase one developed at a cost of $18 million dollars, phase two would cost another $4million. (Councilors Rogers,Zurowski, Skakun and Sethen opposed)

On Monday,  Council  received a report on  the feasibility  of using the existing  piers of the Cameron Street bridge to build a two lane crossing that included a bike lane and pedestrian crossing.  While such a structure might not have the lifespan of a brand new bridge, the  report indicated it was feasible, and the price tag would be about $9.5 million.  

Here is something to keep in mind. 

The $9.5 million price tag  noted in the most recent report is based on 2006 dollars.  The price tag for the new super structure’s first phase, $18 million, is based on 2004 dollars.

Industry experts  tell Opinion 250 the construction costs have risen by  20 - 25% over the past two years.   That means, if the project were to start tomorrow,  the  first phase of the  "superstructure all new bridge"  could be expected to cost, at the very least, $21.5 million.  The second phase, estimated at $4 million would be more likely $5 million.  So instead of the overall project costing the estimated $22 million,  the final price tag could tip into the $27 million dollar range. 

  


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I personally don't think council has any intentions of doing anything with the bridge or replacing it for that matter.
I think they will stall until they can use it as an election ploy....
My though do something now or when elections roll around your promised will mean nothing, not that I take a lot of stock in what they say now.
Thats it. Keep stalling and all those that think we need the bridge will forget about the need. Aleast untill the next election and then we can start the same old BS so that people will forget the real needs of our City and that is the infrastucture decay.

As you drive around the city there are dead weeds, salt eaten curbs and at night the lights at intersections are so poor it is difficult to see the unpainted curbing. Is this a reflection of our council's attitude?

Cheers
i think so kimbo.....
I can't really say what I feel...but that pretty much covers it me thinks....
Kimbo - Some pictures of what you write about. I do nto know how many in this community actually care about this. Maybe it adds to the bloom part of "Communities in Bloom" ... :-)

[url]http://www.flickr.com/photos/26306372@N00/243312685/in/set-72157594284215032[url/]

click onto the 5 set image library on the right of the larger picture to see the rest.
I don't think that the councillors are as free to make decisions as we think. The City Manager's agenda and modus operandi, the various departments and their department heads, budget restrains, government regulations, engineering reports, studies and recommendations, and so forth come into play, as do department inertia and red tape, personal ego trips and politics.

Too many good intentions and common sense fall by the wayside. The result is neither all bad or all good - it is just plain comfortable and sadly mediocre.

Pity.

Your right Diplomat, there is an entire chain of people involved in the operation of our City. The question is why does our city have to have them all the duds. There is a complete lack of community pride. The only function appears to be the economy of the city.

There are people that live here and at times one would think it is a ghost town when you look at the photos that Owl has provided. The sad part is that this attiude starts with some of the property owners as well. There are commercial buildings on 3rd avenue that have dead and dying weeds growing between buildings and ashpalt cracks. Many of the apartments along Ospika have little or no maintenance any time of year.

The sad part is that these shabby looking street scapes can be controlled ecologically with a mixture of salt, vinegar and detergent.

I will whine no more.

Cheers