Clear Full Forecast

Just What IS OBAC Doing? One Man's Opinion

By Ben Meisner

Wednesday, September 27, 2006 03:45 AM

            
It is hard to understand all of the griping going on with respect to the $11.2 million dollars of unused Federal beetle money.

Was it not the responsibility of the Omineca Beetle Action Coalition to have some programs that they wanted put into place, put before the Federal Government and the fund?

Prince George Mayor Colin Kinsley says he was dumfounded the money was clawed back after he says he had met with federal government officials to obtain funding for the UNBC sports center. He was blaming the “feds” for the problem.

Well if there was a request for funding for UNBC out of the Beetle money, I for one would like to see that application. I’m told on good authority from Ottawa there wasn’t one, and perhaps rightfully so, funding the sports center out of beetle money is a bit of a stretch.

Kinsley and crew were told to apply for money for the facility from the Feds "Infrastructure priority funding" plan. That is where the request sits at this very moment and it is no secret that MP Jay Hill has been working on trying to obtain that grant.

OBAC was given $800,000 dollars to work on the beetle problem.  Were the lights out and they couldn’t put together some proposals for beetle projects that didn’t involve pet projects for the City of Prince George?

Normally we know how much money is left in the bank, in this case $11.2 million, but bear in mind when OBAC was holding its meetings before the public, it wasn’t exactly getting the whole town out to come up with ideas. Ten people in Prince George (including OBAC officials) 10 in Ft. St James. 

OBAC says the poor turn out was because the citizens of Prince George were not interested at this time in the Beetle issue.

Well the Active Voice got 120 people out to its meetings and has not been sitting around on its hands.  It is trying to keep the issue in discussion front and center.

Meantime at this week’s Prince George Council meeting Kinsley was saying The Active Voice Coalition’s "Stand up for the North" Conference was a duplication of the OBAC efforts.

OBAC has burned up about $300,000 of taxpayer’s money so far and are crowing about what they have been able to accomplish.

One thing is certain, OBAC needs someone in their group who knows how to count money, who knows the difference between a program to offset the effects of the loss of our forests  and a grant for a Sports Center , and they also need to know that 20 people at a couple of meetings is not "input from the community".

I’m Meisner and that is one man’s opinion.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Well said Ben. My feelings exactly.

I haven't been following this story closely enough, apparently, but it CAN'T be true that our mayor has been expecting funding for the Northern Sports Centre to come from federal financial assistance for the mountain pine beetle epidemic...

Can it..?

What's the possble connection, except some obtuse 'quality of life' or 'economic development' argument(s)..?
Perhaps, the walls of the gym were supposed to "block the flight of the beatles". I thought it was a bit of a strech also.
OBAC sounds like a waste of money with no leadership. The problems and even the solutions are obvious and a Northern Sports Center was no where near relevant to their mandate. My bet was the board was all political.
The purpose of the money to be given to a community which is going to be financially and socially affected by a change in the income from the forests due to the impact of the MPB is primarily to diversify the economy. Part of the money can certainly be used to determine best use of the affected material as well as best approaches to minimize the impact of the MPB on the tree stands.

So, as far as I can tell, anything is game if one can justify it. As always, it is easier to justify some things rather than others. Some proposals come with more risk of success than others. Some come with political strings attached. Some get approval more due to politics than due to justification.

So, could I write a justification for funding the sports centre? Sure, why not? A performing arts centre? Sure! A connection from downtown to the Nechako Waterfront via a connection over the CN tracks? Sure! Development money for infrastructure to combine higher density residential, recreation, and home office development adjacent to Cottonwood Island Park with a similar infrastructure development in the Hudson Bay slough area with water access.

Any money which goes to improving infrastructure which makes PG a more pleasant and diverse place to live and work should go towards providing a drawing card of providing the raw material required in a diverse economy - the people who will make small, diversified companies successful.

To my mind that is one of the key uses of such money. Anyone who does not understand that is living the old economic dream. We have been given an opportunity to break out of the dependency on natural resources. I am not saying give it up. I am saying diversify. Others are saying diversify. How often do we have to be told?

I don't buy it Owl (making a pitch for bug money to finance a public sports facility).

I completely support the facility, by the way, but NOT the City's attempt to shoe-horn the project into the beetle dough's mandate.

We all want, and need, transparency in civic, municipal, provincial and federal funding - bug money goes to bug projects, sports money goes to sports projects, transportation money goes to transportation projects..

This vague mixing and matching of funds in the name of 'economic development' is dangerous in my opinion, particulary with respect to fiscal accountability.