Clear Full Forecast

Radio Challenges: One Man's Opinion

By Ben Meisner

Tuesday, November 28, 2006 03:45 AM

        
On Dec 5th, the latest radio ratings for this region will be released.

The survey was taken back in October, when all of the contests were on as a means of trying to get you to listen to a particular station. It is an age old practice in the business in which the radio station is attempting to be able to top up its audience therefore adding to its sales ability.

Last year I celebrated 50 years in the news business, the majority of it in Radio and TV.  With that, comes (if nothing else) an ability to say that you have seen it come and go.

Unless my reasoning is completely amiss, all of the radio stations in PG, save perhaps the CBC, can look for a decline in audience.

Oh they still will be trying to be number one, two, or three, but they all have been on a slippery slope due, in at least some measure, to some bad calculations by themselves.

While FM radio was the buzz of the day, no consideration was given to the fact that when switching to all FM in this region,  once you get out of town oh say  35 kilometers, you’re without a signal .

There was an opportunity for CKPG to pick up a 50,000 watt AM transmitter sitting idle in Red Deer, but the brains of the day decided Stereo radio was the way to go.

Satellite radio was just coming on the scene but it was quite happy to fill that void and today in the central and northern part of the province it is growing like the Beetle epidemic.  If you add to that MP3 players, IPODs, cell phones with downloadable tunes, and of course a generation that is tuned out of news,  and it has all the ingredients for bad news for traditional broadcasting.

To make matter worse, the local radio businesses decided they wanted to attract that younger demographic so at least three of the stations were trying to out do one another as to who supplied the product the best.

In their efforts, they have decided to get rid of that information section, the section that put them where they are in the first place.

So there has been a reduction in news and public affairs but more music, in many cases, "canned" meaning there actually isn’t any announcer there, it is just an automatic tape running with a voice saying "that was, this is".  

Trying to find a warm body in the evening and weekend at any station is a bit of an effort.  It saves money for staff, it is easy to look after without the problems of trying to cover the news and it plain and simply makes you more money, and money in the end is what it’s all about.

Meantime the listeners who have supported you, those in their middle age who by the way are beginning to make up a major slice of Canada’s population, are left to look elsewhere.

Radio you see according to the heavies is supposed to reach the 25 to 54. I guess those over that age don’t have any money with which to buy or support advertising.
It also spills over to TV while stations don’t like to admit it, with a choice of  over 300 channels on one bird and 250 on the other, there are many times of the day when a small local TV outlet comes very close to having a couple of goose eggs for viewers.

A couple of weeks ago The Drive gave its evening sports talk program with Dan Russell the boot in favour of more music to appeal to a younger demographic, problem is with a couple of hundred stereo stations on either of the satellite birds  (without any commercials) and reception anywhere, are they going to increase that audience?  Not likely.

When I first entered this business, the 8.00p.m. nightly news was the most listened to news cast of the day.

You may remember when Walt Disney came on at 6, Ed Sullivan at 8 and Bonanza at 9, everyone sat in front of the tube, those days are long gone and the audience and viewers went with them.

I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s opinion.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Kamloops actually kept their AM station (610) they play Good Time Oldies as well as new stuff and have recently added the Bill Good program at 10:00 and another talk show at 13:00 not sure what that one is but apparently it picked up a few more listeners. I myself have had a satelite radio for over two years and unless there is a talk show on, I listen to that. Hit Purden or Hixon and you lose the FM signals.
Quote: A couple of weeks ago The Drive gave its evening sports talk program with Dan Russell the boot in favour of more music to appeal to a younger demographic, problem is with a couple of hundred stereo stations on either of the satellite birds (without any commercials) and reception anywhere, are they going to increase that audience? Not likely.

Right on,Ben. I was PO'd when this happened as I've been a loyal Sports Talk listener for over 15 years, and was told by the stations all knowing Mgr that he knew I would still listen, because he "knew" I was a classic rock listener? What? I want Sports Talk back, and he tells me I can still listen on my computer. Not when I'm in bed! He gave some excuse about NW' wanting too much $$ to continue the program. All I can see is a station Mgr looking at the bottom line and nothing else. To hell with the listeners. Yeah, that's gonna pay dividends. Satellite Radio here I come.
Tune you car radio to 88.1 and drive around town and listen to all the satellite radio's out there!
Local advertisers are not reaching the majority of people any more...
I listen to talk radio during the day via the internet - CKNW out of Vancouver. We have satellite in the vehicles. Much better than the local stations.
I spent 35 years in radio and I can tell you that the difference between a good radio station and a GREAT radio station is what the announcer does between the hits. It's as simple as that. Good quality entertainment attracts it's own audience no matter where it is . . . Satellite, iPod or radio. Anyone can play the music whether it's a radio station or an iPod. Sadly, in their zeal to become wealthy in show biz, owners have driven wages down so far that truly talented people are no longer attracted to the business, while 'broadcast schools' churn out graduates who just cannot begin to imagine how entertaining they could be on the air because they were not taught anything of value and a lot of them aren't suited for radio.

Furthermore, if your format is 'classic hits' then you absolutly must execute it exactly right or you are doomed to failure.
Yeah, local radio, for the most part, is trash. That is my opinion, I know that few would agree, but the mindless, and loud, commercial spots pushing HARD SELL, BUY NOW, over and over drove me away years ago. Plus the repetitive nature of the "music" they flog makes me sick! The top 40 mentality. No variety.I turned to the CBC 25 years ago, just so I could stand to listen to the radio. Now, they are not always to my taste either, but at least there is some variety there. The university radio station is interesting to listen to at times also. Satellite radio, theres the ticket. I love it. Although not totally ad free, as was originally advertised, it offers the ultimate in variety. For me it is worth the monthly fee.
Who cares about local radio!!! SATELLITE RADIO RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The loss of local radio is truly a loss. Local stations help to provide a sense of community, a sense of home. The satellite networks can never hope to do that. Which brings us to the question of why the local stations try to be more like satellite and less like their roots? The answer appears to be a short term drive for profits at the expense of long term survival. It seems the local stations have forgotten that the principle of survival is to be different from everyone else. You cannot be the same as satellite and win. The local touch, the local feeling, the local announcer, the local news team, that is what will make the difference. Mind you, is Ben not already proving that day in and day out with Opinion250?
oh drat.....Just realized.....that's 2 positive to Ben comments in 2 days..........ok, that's it better watch out of the 3rd day Ben!!! :-)
I liked the talk radio for local radio when we had it, because it was always nice to hear other peoples opinions. The CBC noon hour is not bad at times, but I think that is the only talk radio out there anymore. I now listen to the satalite radio when working and I really like the CNN, Fox, talk radio channels they have for keeping informed. You can only listen to music for so long before falling asleep so its nice to have a radio station that engages the brain.
I agree with all of you. I tuned to satellite radio last year. I've never looked back. It's actually gotten so bad, that I prefer to wake up to the blood curdling shriek from my alarm clock as opposed to the alternative. I spent some time in radio and not that long ago for that matter. Your talent makes your station and your content backs it up (in my opinion). Canadian Content regulations combined with lackluster talent is enough to drive one out of the industry.
Canada's media is all owned by large corporations that are in the business to control perceptions and or make profits. They are not in the business to provide and share information that would strengthen communities and by extension our democracy.

All the newspapers in BC for example are owned directly or indirectly by two multinational corporations. None of them are locally owned, with locally meaning BC not even the region or city they represent. Ditto for our television media, and radio is not far behind.

These multinationals and corporations are driven by their political agenda's and those political agenda's are not primarily to inform viewers (listeners), or to engage openly with their viewers. The genus of their primary objective is to run a block for their commercial enterprises by favouring like minded politicians, and setting the political agenda. The managers are simply pawns that think its about profits.

Our media diversity is a fraud, and our regulators are their agents. Our governments are the end result.

IMO no media company should be allowed to own more than 20% of a provinces newpaper distribution, or 10% of its radio stations. Our biggest fight should be for net neutrality to ensure future alternate forms of media are not squeezed out of accessible relevance by these very multinationals that are conspiring to control our media, and then by extension our politics, and then by extension our economic wealth. Failure means we will fight puppet wars, endure resource rape, as well as restrictions of our rights as a free people.

Time Will Tell
CBC Radio for the news, some comedy, and after that nothing but wonderful silence. Ones thoughts are far more interesting than the Gibberish that comes out of Radio Stations these days.

Bens talk show years ago had a huge following (not me) that were really upset when it was closed down. People would always be referring to this show. I hear nothing now.

I did some security years ago, and I can tell you from experience that you rarely ever found a live body in a radio or tv station after midnight.

The madness that was called downsizing and all the BS that attended it is now coming home to roost. We now have a severe lack of trained people to cover jobs, BC Hydro cannot properly respond to power failures because they do not have the proper manning (Even though they still make Millions of Dollars for the Government) CN Rail has had huge reductions in manning over the years, and seems to be rivited on the bottom line, however it appears that their safety record hand gone by the board as a result.

There are other cases, however as we all know, (You reap what you sow) The so called hot shots of the past 20 years (Who really know nothing at all) are now faced with some realitys that I doubt they will be able to deal with.

Crooked smiles, limp handshakes, fancy cars, big houses, and the ability to build your career on the backs of others, never was my forte.
I can't remember the last time I actually turned on my radio....
The best I can remember we had AM and FM stations.....
I hear we don't have AM anymore....and I don't have an FM radio....
Silence is golden....
I must admit that i have considered getting a satellite radio. I have been listening to radio day in and day out in PG for years while i worked and i am getting pretty tired. There is too much repetition, period. One station has spent a lot of time calling me a grey haired old fart (i am only 45 for gods sake). And i just dont like britney pop. While i am not a sports fan i think it is great that one station covers the hockey games.
As for news, well if they had more than one news report over the course of the day i would be more likely to tune in. It is pretty sad that the news is just the same 3 minute blurb repeated every hour. I understand there are costs involved but when everyone tunes out there will be no radio left at all.
Ben, either come back on the radio or train someone to do it and find them a job on one of the stations here. Your show was excellent.
Oh yes, one more thing, I think a lot of our radio 'personalities' need to develope personalities before going on the air. I know many of them are young but it is genuinely painful to listen to them trying to discuss current events or, well , ANYTHING in an intelligent manner. A really good rant requires a little life experience maybe.
And, don't you love the government created CRTC. They decided in 1972 or so, that Candians don't have the brains to choose the music to which they listen, so they chose thirty percent of what you will hear and crammed it in your ear without your permission and at your expense. Oh boy! National pride at the point of the government gun.

By the way, did you know that about a billion of your tax dollars go to run the CBC every year. Year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year after year.
The radio stations in PG are owned and operated by Pattison are they not (some anyway) Remember Overwaitea? Changed the name to Save On Foods to get rid of the half decent paying jobs. Just another example of the rich getting richer off the backs of the employees that make them the money in the first place.
My radio time is split roughly like this.

Sirius 80%

CBC 19.9%

Wolf 97.3FM 0.1%

If the stations want to survive I think they need to be on Sirius sattelite radio...or they are doomed to be the next dinosaur.

I do wish that CBC channel 137 on Sirius was the same programing as the local CBC though, not a back east broadcast...So I rarely listen to that.



I want to know why the "classic rock" station plays so little good classic rock, and so much newer rock? Isn't there already a station a few notches away that plays the newer rock music?

I'm a radio flipper. Whoever isn't playing commercials gets my ear while I'm driving.
I find that everytime I tune into local radio programming, I become so annoyed with the racket, that I am forced to shut it off. Now, I'm part of the over 50 crowd, so I wonder if many others feel the same way.

I like easy listening. I like Jazz, I like Blues, I like good old rock and roll.

But, I can't stand what is being delivered to us on a daily basis. Chester
You got it right Chester. I dont even turn it on anymore. Ive got the old records of a lot of the music that goes back to the 1940's through to the mid seventies, and I listen to that from time to time. Much better than the **Noise** I'll take Fats Domino and Blueberry Hill anyday.