Clear Full Forecast

Lead Investigator In St. Arnaud Case Takes The Stand

By 250 News

Friday, January 26, 2007 12:08 PM

The Coroner’s Inquest into the December 18th 2004  shooting death of Kevin St. Arnaud continued this morning in Vanderhoof with testimony from Staff Sergeant Glen Krebbs, the lead investigator in the police shooting.

Counsel for the family, Cameron Ward,  asked Krebbs how he had weighed the evidence before submitting a report  that  recommmended no charges be laid?  Krebbs testified that of the evidence collected  "You have to weigh eye witness accounts in an investigation, and I rely more heavily on physical evidence."  

Staff Sergeant Krebbs had testified that forensics don’t lie. 

Ward told the inquest  Constable Sherametta`s statement of events was, "Contradictory to those of the pathologist, the person who analyzed the blood, the forensic expert, the  three independent witnesses who came forward the following day and his fellow officer."  Ward then asked  "Having said that, would it be fair to say Staff Sergeant Krebbs that he, (Sheremetta ) was in jeopardy?

Krebbs replied  "Yes".

Ward pointed out the only person who had something to gain from Sherametta’s statement, was, Sherametta.

Cameron Ward attempted to have entered  as evidence Staff Sergeant Krebb’s notebook of the events as they transpired, but was unable to get those notes entered under the argument the notebook contained privileged information  between Krebbs and his legal Counsel.

Earlier  this morning, the video tape of the  initial interview of Constable Ryan Sherametta conducted by then Corporal Jim MacLellan was played to the Jury.   In that interview, Sheremetta  demonstrates how he fired his gun, his arms  pointing upward, saying St. Arnaud was less than 5 feet away from him. 

St. Arnaud died after being shot three times in a soccerfield in Vanderhoof in the early hours of December 19th, 2004.  He was a suspect in a break and enter at a Vanderhoof drug store.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

A lawyer and a liar.
When the lead investigator says he relies more heavily on physical evidence than eyewitness accounts, but disregarded all of it in favor of Sherametta's statement, you now know exactly why Crown was not able to approve charges.

If this matter goes to a criminal trial, you can expect his notes will be examined.
You don't write your personal correspondence into your notebook. It is for preservation of evidence, information, and timelines, and is subject to cross examination. Information contained in the notebook that does not relate to the matter at hand, can and will be omitted and not diclosed to counsel. Everything else is evidence and subject to scrutiny, and the notebook is the property of the Crown, not the officer.

I expect, that for good reasons, he does not want anybody to view the notes he made on the incident.
Sheremetta. A hired Cst. because he is a visible minority? That's what happens when the rcmp lowers the bar to recruit. See article on labour shortage hits rcmp from jaunary 19!