Clear Full Forecast

Sentence Fell Flat: One Man's Opinion

By Ben Meisner

Friday, March 09, 2007 03:45 AM

The idea of justice equal to all took a slap in the face yesterday when two crooks who had bilked the CIBC of over a million bucks received a 24 month less a day conditional sentence.

Oh yes they will need to pack along their cell phones just in case the guy from the parole board calls, but that’s about the extent of the sentence they both received.

While other charges were never brought against  Doug Walls and Mike Millard in the collapse of Fred Walls and Son’s back in 1998, they should have been.

Receiving what can only be described as slap on the wrist leaves the people of this area crying out for justice. It also leaves one wondering is there a law for the rich and a law for the rest of the people in this society?

That question today is well founded.

To the north of the Pine Pass, former Mayor Steve Thorlakson must head off to jail on the weekends for not paying his income tax. To the south in Vancouver you can steal a million bucks and you don’t serve a day.

To add to that I recall back in the late 90’s of the people hiding their vehicles fearful that they were about to be repossessed because the payments had not been made, and yet they had receipts showing that they had. Well as it turned out many of these trucks had never been registered to the rightful owner. What happened to all of this?  Why weren’t there charges? Some owners went for a year or more without using the vehicle that they had purchased for fear of it being grabbed by the finance company.

What about the employees of the company, those who gave their all? No sir, justice is crying out to be served this fine morning, and the term if you’re rich and famous rings in their ears.

A sentence has been handed out to two crooks which will be the envy of every fly by nighter in the country. The system should be ashamed of itself.

I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s opinion.    


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Ben, your getting old and losing it fast. Get your facts and don't just ramble. Be the reporter you pretend to be.

Quote from a real news source "The Prince George Citizen today"

In making the ruling, Dohm noted extensive letters of support for both men and the fact they did not receive any personal gain from the fraud.

The two men were engaged in a cheque-kiting scheme in a failed attempt to save the Fred Walls and Son Ford dealership.

The scheme cost CIBC about $1.5 million and also left many of the 70 employees out of pocket in terms of severance.

One of them was Mike Walch, a 22-year employee at the dealership which went bankrupt in 1998.

Walch said the sentence Dohm handed down was about what he expected and added he's since put the episode behind him.

"I believe a lot of the things he was doing was to try and keep the business afloat and keep the people employed," he said. "In a lot of respects, you almost got to say thanks for trying, sort of thing."
GOOD COMMENTS BEN. HIT THE NAIL RIGHT ON THE HEAD. THESE BOYS SHOULD BE IN THE SLAMMER FOR THE FINANCIAL HARDSHIPS THAT THEY CAUSED TO MANY CONSUMERS IN THE P.G. AREA. GUESS THE JUDGE WASN'T ONE OF THEM.
SEEMS THAT IF YOU ARE TRYING TO SAVE A FAILING BUSINESS IT IS OK TO BREAK THE LAW.
THE JUDGE SAID THESE BOYS DIDN'T GAIN FROM THIS SCAM.THEY LIVED PRETTY GOOD AND DROVE NEW CARS DURING THIS TIME,BUT I GUESS THAT IS NOT A GAIN.
I think the ruling needs interpretation

"In making the ruling, Dohm noted extensive letters of support for both men"

What Gordon Campbell helping out his in-laws (again)?

" and the fact they did not receive any personal gain from the fraud."

They are inept thiefs
Gee ain't it funny how twisted these tales can become after eight plus years. After maintaining their innocence for so long they abruptly plead guilty. Now they were doing it for the good of the community, in that 'we were trying to save the company but not for ourselves, for the people' Yeah right, they did it for the employees, tell me another one duggie. In my books, you were stealing, and not just from the bank (which some of us might see as o.k.) but from Joe and Jane citizen who thought they owned the vehicle they paid for. What a load of c^@p. They should be in jail, and should have to pay back the money.
metalman.
I agree with herbster - my suspicion is that the judge got instructions from Gordon Campbell to make the sentence light. We keep getting closer and closer to the third world's system of justice and everything else tumbles down with it.
Is the Crown going to appeal the sentence or are they also willing pawns in this game?
It SHOULD be appealed but I am willing to bet it won't be.I have seen some beauty's in the court system for various offences lately,but this is without a doubt one of the worst!How any prosecuter can sit back and say that justice was done is beyond me.This case should not be allowed to fade way.There HAS to be more to it?
I will be emailing my MLA/MP and I hope others do the same.I guess we all know it won't do any good, but it may make them realize that somebody does pay attention to our justice system.Or what is left of it.
THese kinds of things are what we need to remember at election time!
You're not getting old Ben. And you have hit the nail on the head as usual..Common crooks would have been doing time long before now...
Heck I would likely get 5 years if i shoplifted a chocolate bar with my luck.

And they get a slap on the wrist for BIG TIME fraud ....WTF
Free enterprise:
The Citizen a real news source?
Are you joking? The Citizen has become a tabloid. And judging by the quality of (some of) their writing, I would have to assume that journalism schools have lowered the bar.
metalman.
It took nine years for THIS?
and in two years, no record if they keep their noses out of trouble...
wow...who says crime don't pay