Bylaws One Aye, One Nay
By 250 News
Prince George City Council resumed the public hearing on bylaws which propose regulations for pawn shops and second hand dealers, and a bylaw which would change zoning that might impact the development of lots along the rivers. (see previous story)
Pawn shops / Second Hand dealers
The bylaw has been defeated, but not without lots of discussion.
Some of the questions raised in the first part of the public hearing now had answers, for instances: Will the pawn shop and second hand dealer bylaw incude auction houses? Answer is yes. City staff have already asked that Council add to the bylaw the allowing of goods to be picked up.
Auctioneer Brock McElroy came before Council to ask some questions.
- will the bylaw which would cover his business also include multi-family garage sales? the answer is no
- Items to be included in the 2nd hand list covers not only construction tools. Answer : items like chainsaws have been added because they are high theft items along with forestry and farm equipment and tools.
- Does the bylaw allow the RCMP to seize a computer to check records? Answer: yes.
- What about out of town auctioneers, they come here and they often bring items with them. Do they have to keep it here for 30 days? Answer: They would have to hold it here for 30 days before it could be sold.
McElroy says often he gets calls from people who say they are moving, and would like to sell their goods before they leave, "We will have to tell them, well, we can sell your furniture, but everything else has to be held for 30 days." McElroy says the potential client will likely pack up their goods and drop them off at the next auction house at the next town.
RCMP Superintendent Dahl Chambers says while the RCMP don’t want to point fingers at any one dealer, or auctioneer, he says clearly, all who deal with second hand equipment have to be covered so the regulations are consistent. Chambers says the RCMP have not had any issues with auctioneers. "It is not the integrity of the auctioneers that is in question here" says Chambers "it is the integrity of the people who bring the property to them that is in question."
Councilor Don Zurowski wanted to know if someone brings their snowmobile in to a snow machine dealership and wants to trade that machine for another, would the dealership have to hold that trade-in for 30 days? Under the proposed bylaw, the dealership would have to hold that trade-in for 30 days before they could sell the item. That , says Mayor Colin Kinsley, makes the bylaw onerous "We started out wanting to deal with pawn and second-hand shops and it seems to have grown legs" The Mayor wants the "legitimate dealership" aspect examined.
The President of the Auctioneer’s Association says the bylaw will kill the auctioneer business in Prince George. Tom DeWaal says if auctioneers have to store items for 30 days, their profit margin will be eaten by rental fees and it does nothing to help identify stolen property. "You would be better off requiring a five day public viewing period for all property that is to be auctioned, that way police can look, the public can look". He says people who want to get rid of stolen property want to get rid of it quickly and get a rapid turn around for cash. The auction is not that kind of place. He says items are advertised for a week and auction proceeds are not distributed until about a week after the sale, so the timing is all wrong for those who steal property.
Councilor Don Basserrmann says 30 days is too long, and a week is too short. He asked how could the RCMP review all the material in one week? He says how can a victim of crime even evaluate all the things that are missing in a week?
Councilor Don Zurowski says there have been too many issues raised to pass the bylaw as it stands "This is a rebuild not an ammendment" says Zurowski.
Councilor Murry Krause says this bylaw is desperately needed in the community to curb crime. "The staff have done what we have asked them to do. I think we need to differentiate between the auctioneers and the second hand dealers and pawn shops. I think this bylaw does need some work to address the concerns that have been raised over the two evenings we have discussed this issue."
Mayor Colin Kinsley, in recommending the bylaw be defeated, said there are just too many issues that need to be dealt with. He referred to one of the problems with the bylaw "when something isn’t working you trade it in to a legitimate dealer and get a new one."
Zoning bylaw 7850
The bylaw has been approved and the issue that has come to light under this one has to do with "top of bank" versus "high-water mark". The new rules would require a setback of 30 metres from "top of bank". The change in terms means the new set backs could pose serious development challenges to some properties as it reduces the size of the site. The bylaw has been approved, but there are some changes expected.
Councilor Sherry Sethen asked if there was some way it could be enshrined that "People who bought properties in good faith would be allowed to build in good faith?" Manager of Current Planning, Dan Milburn, wouldn’t go that far. He did say that although it was possible to grandfather in the lots that were already purchased, he didn’t think that was necessary.
Milburn also indicated that in most cases, "high water mark" and "top of bank" are the same, and the existing covenants on the Sunset Place properties is already more restrictive as it calls for a 40 meter set back.
Mr. Milburn did not mention that the covenants call for setbacks from high water marks, not top of bank, and that the covenants not only set minimum house size, they also say there shall be no fences, yet City Staff have been advising home builders they must include a fence along the property.
Councilor Sethen presented some ideas to be referred to City Staff for "housekeeping", including some clarity on 3-1 slopes and a certain amount of security for those who purchased property before the new bylaw came into effect can develop their property to the previous rules and regulations.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
?????? Why does he not want to point fingers at those he suspects or has proof of dealing in stolen goods? Isn't that the whole point of a police force? Segregate those who appear to be acting illegally, observe, and if proof shows up, charge them.
Why make everyone's life miserable instead of those few who may be flaunting the law?
He is being far too apologetic.