Clear Full Forecast

Time for Forest Industry to Think Outside the Box

By 250 News

Sunday, April 15, 2007 05:18 AM

As the  lumber prices  drop,  and the  forest industy  dips into one of its cyclical "troughs" there is the reality that  had  most forest industry  players NOT received a healthy refund in  softwood lumber duties in the fourth quarter of 2006, they would have  recorded  deep losses.  For some it would  have been the second straight  year of losses.

The very survival of  the industry could  rely  on "thinking outside of the box"  at least that is the  scenario painted by one market analyst.

Don Roberts, the Managing Director of C IBC World Markets says there are realities to be faced.  “We’re going to have less fibre in the BC Interior, the issue is how we deal with it.  We will likely see fewer pulp mills in the interior.” 

The number of pulp mills could be decreased even more says Roberts if the demand for bio-energy mass grows to a point where pulp mills have to compete with a dwindling supply of fibre.  That isn’t necessarily a bad thing says Roberts “Maybe we’ll make more money in that.  Maybe that will be a more stable form of business over time than you know, some of the sort of alternative industry we’ve got."

  Roberts says one thing is clear, the status quo isn’t working.  He says while the forest industry worries about the labour shortage and the impact that shortage is having on housing starts (for example, too few carpenters) he says there is an opportunity.  “If there aren’t enough carpenters, then eliminate the need for them.   We can build pre-fab homes so the need for a carpenter is reduced.”

Roberts points to an American company as a prime example of how a company can make a positive turn.   “There is a U.S. company called Universal Forest Products, this engineered wood company now does the installed framing for builders and their profits are consistently higher than any Canadian forest products company and they are stable.”

Robert’s  view isn’t  bleak, “ We will always  have the U.S. Market, and we will continue to feed that giant, but  in my view it shouldn’t be just the  traditional U.S. market,  we should try  to go up scale and that is easier said than done”  He points to the renovation market as an option but he knows  the changes won’t be easy “It’s not going to  be a one size fits all solution, you know we’re going to have to be a little more nimbler,  everyone’s being nimbler in order to survive.”


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

"If there aren’t enough carpenters, then eliminate the need for them. We can build pre-fab homes so the need for a carpenter is reduced.”

What Mr Roberts fails to point out is that we have been there, done that in the past already. There are still hangers on to that time period of the post war years when there was a shortage of labour. We still have modular homes, either entirely pre-built or built in panelized construction.

Those concrete condos going up these days would have had a good percentage of them built in prefab panels to increase the automated factory components.

There is a completely different economy of scale and dynamics which take over with panel systems. Transportation is expensive, thus such assembly plants must be built in locations which are as close to market as possible. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, switching to panelization gives other systems using different materials a chance at the market which was locked up by wood stick builders. If this were actually to happen, look to the Europeans to come back into the supply side of the equation.

Austria http://www.elk.at

USA http://www.topsiderhomes.com/about.asp#technology

Germany http://www.hanse-haus.de/con_05.php?firstindex=4
Note their promotion of alternate energy sources http://www.hanse-haus.de/con_05_04.php?firstindex=4&secondindex=4

Australia http://www.housesofthefuture.com.au/hof_houses03.html

Denmark http://www.alibaba.com/catalog/11233821/Prefabricated_Houses.html

China, Container home (those who were around to see the Yellowhead Inn being built you may recall the rooms were “modular” units brought in, similar to this building in China.
http://www.alibaba.com/catalog/11058277/Containerhome_Container_House.html

Turkey http://www.alibaba.com/catalog/10950397/Prefabricated_Buildings/showimg.html

Thailand http://lino53.trustpass.alibaba.com/product/11704753/501_Prefab_Modular_Building_And_Container_System/showimg.html
This is the firm this fella talks about:

http://www.ufpi.com/product/index.htm

do the products look familar? trusses, open joists, pressure treated wood, etc. etc ...

Canucks have done this for close to half a century .... those are already our products ... no thinking "outside the box" there at all!!!!

Gotta get a bit more creative ...

remember, this guy is a banker, not building designer or builder ...
"this engineered wood company now does the installed framing for builders"

Using carpenters or burger flippers????
The question will alway be. Whos Don Roberts??????
..... and, we turn once more to the Internet ....

http://www.cintrafor.org/CONFERENCE_TAB/ifpm%202004/Roberts_Bio.pdf

An Academic .... has he ever been the owner of a firm such as Trusco? or any other of the many small, local forest products firms who manufacture sufficient product for their particular market radius?

Or does he only believe in large conglomerates, which is what his UFPI is, that gobble up such firms and take the earnings out of the communities? You know, the ones who buy up the regional businesses, and then, when there is a downturn, shut them down to keep the more central manufacturers going, meanwhile leaving smaller regional cities waiting for product delivery.

Producing trusses and space joists is hardly rocket science. Neither are fence posts, boards, railings, etc. etc.
It's always about people wanting to make money.

The following is from an article in yesterday's Vancouver Sun. Our big local forest industry companies (Canfor and Canfor Pulp) figure prominently in the article.

N.Y. firm gains huge stake in B.C. forest industry
Third Avenue Management LLC, which paid $880 million, specializes in distressed firms
Gordon Hamilton, Vancouver Sun
Published: Saturday, April 14, 2007

A New York investment firm specializing in distressed companies has bought a $1-billion stake in the Canadian forest industry, expecting to profit from future mill closures and consolidation.

Most of the money -- $880 million -- is in B.C. companies.

Third Avenue Management LLC, which manages $27 billion in investments worldwide, has been steadily increasing its stake in British Columbia forest companies. It is now the largest shareholder in the province's two pulp and paper companies and is threatening B.C. billionaire Jim Pattison's spot as the major shareholder in lumber giant Canfor Corp.

The investment firm is maintaining silence over its strategy in increasing its stake in the B.C. industry, turning down interview requests until after Canfor's May 4 annual general meeting.

The issues are too sensitive to discuss at this time, company representative Bridget Smith said, referring to a battle within Canfor over a plan supported by Third Avenue to remove that company's poison pill.

However, in its own publications, Third Avenue lays out an investment strategy that includes buying into an entire industrial sector and then waiting for opportunities to shut down capacity and consolidate companies to generate profits.

Third Avenue Management owns 24.3 per cent of Canfor Corp. and is still buying according to the most recent filings, creeping up on Jim Pattison's 25.06-per-cent stake.

Third Avenue has also increased its holdings in Canfor Pulp, the income trust spun off by Canfor last year. Recent filings show it is the largest shareholder, owning 21.5 per cent of that company. Canfor owns 50.2 per cent of the pulp company, further magnifying Third Avenue's ownership and influence.

The following is the link to the article in case someone is interested in reading it.

http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/business/story.html?id=2e4615f6-770a-44e6-840b-9b21d0c240d9&k=70953
When the Sun published that on the 14th, it was already well known that Pattison (Great Pacific Industries Inc.), along with Mathews-Cartier Holdings Ltd. (Bentley and Prentice families) and Third Avenue had made a voting pact for purposes of the May Board meeting. That announcement was made March 12 which showed that the pact was made to avoid a creeping takeover. At issue was a shareholder’s rights plan

They apparently have a difference of opinion about Jim Shepherd who was likely asked to resign as CEO since he may have had a different approach to managing the company in the interests of its key shareholders during impending tough times.

It sounds like Stephen Jarislowsky, chairman of Montreal-based investment firm Jarislowsky Fraser Ltd., had wanted Shepherd to stay on to see whether he can handle the situation.
Will the last person to leave please turn off the lights. With faceless, nameless corporations gobbling up our industry, you guys are right, they will close our livelihoods down in a 'New York Minute' so to speak. As soon as the almighty shareholders are not making their quarterly dividends anymore, they will flip or shut down our industries. What happens to FMC and Chemtrade when pulpmills srart to close down? The domino effect, my friends.The dollar, that fickle instrument of doom, always rules. That, Virginia, is one thing you can count on in this day and age.
metalman.