Clear Full Forecast

Air Committee Moving Forward

By 250 News

Wednesday, April 25, 2007 03:55 AM

    

The Prince George Air Quality Implementation Committee is trying to spread the word about the work it is doing.

This week, Chair of the Committee, Dave Sutherland, (in photo at right) conducted several media interviews to bring everyone up to date and there is work underway on a website to keep the latest information available.

Why?

Sutherland says they want to spread the word about the ongoing work “The primary reason is we have had the phase two management plan approved by the City of Prince George and the Regional District of Fraser Fort George and we are now into the implementation part of that plan.”

With 19 members in the Committee, ranging from the air quality watch dog group PACHA to reps from the major industries in Prince George, the Committee is setting up smaller working groups which will tackle some of the 30 recommendations contained in the most recent Prince George Air Quality Management Plan “Phase Two”. That plan was presented to City Council last November.

Chair Dave Sutherland says the phase two plan is a “bridge”. “The major changes to emission sources , which will produce the best improvement in air quality, will be in the next phase of this, as there are studies that have yet to be completed.” says Sutherland. Those studies are expected to be complete by the spring of 2008.

In the meantime, Sutherland says there are two major issues facing Prince George “One is the open burning resulting from the mountain pine beetle disposal, and the other is any new emission sources that might want to develop in this area.”

The Committee has already been asked by the Ministry of the Environment to make some recommendations on a pellet plant’s proposed move to the BCR site “We have been asked to get involved because it does represent the first new source in there.” Sutherland says this particular application will start the process of developing rules and policies for new emission sources and his Committee will have the opportunity to make recommendations to the Ministry of the Environment and the City. “What we’re hoping to see here is no degradation in air quality.”

As for the mountain pine beetle open burning, Sutherland says that will require coordinated efforts with the Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Forests, the City and Regional District.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

...pellet plant’s proposed move to the BCR site."

This is a plant that uses sawdust to make pellets, so not much chance these guys are going to welcome into the economic dynamo of the mighty Prince George!

Pack it up boys, don't waste your time on PG, go somewhere else and follow the trend out of this town.

"That plan was presented to City Council last November."

That was 5 months ago ..... working as slow as ever. The world moves a bit faster than that boys and girls.
-------------------------------
In the meantime, Sutherland says there are two major issues facing Prince George “One is the open burning resulting from the mountain pine beetle disposal"

I hope the wording here is in error and that what it is meant to say is the requested burning … as opposed to, for instance, chipping anything that cannot be removed in place and keeping the product on the ground to provide nutrients as the city has done within its parks.

------------------------
“the other is any new emission sources that might want to develop in this area.” Does it really take 19 people to figure out that the solution is to develop a new, energy efficient industrial park outside the bowl area, close to trackage and improve the highway so that incoming feedstock from all directions do not have to be routed through the city?

Even better would be to look at small, almost portable plants close the feedstock and adjacent to hydro access to feed the energy into the grid and move any other usable byproduct into the transportation network for use elsewhere.

Using the two approaches, with the latter likely needing some technology development, would go a long way to solve the bowl’s industrial generated air emission problems.
BTW, the PBEC pellet plant has already moved. Unless it is an additional one being planned.
YDPC ... time to move into the realities of the 21st century .... the only elsewhere these days are places like Russia, and even they are crossing into the 21st century and getting the highgraders like Korea out of there ...
“the other is any new emission sources that might want to develop in this area.” Does it really take 19 people to figure out that the solution is to develop a new, energy efficient industrial park outside the bowl area, close to trackage and improve the highway so that incoming feedstock from all directions do not have to be routed through the city?
The above posted by Owl
Right on
Now, how about the pollution that is already here? Canfor? Oh no, they just gave 1/million to the UNBC Sport Centre. What a sop. If they really cared about PG they would move their polluting causing plant out of the bowl.
Some excellent comments made above. I think that if this committee was going any slower it would be going backwards. Could this be a make work project as well as spin on our polution problems.? Damn, it must be those bad people burning wood for heat or maybe road dust.
"Damn, it must be those bad people burning wood for heat or maybe road dust"

Which is precisely what continues to be the main thrust of the work of the committee.

To add insult to injury, they have hired themselves a spin doctor with our dollars so that they can twist the information we receive.