Clear Full Forecast

Just Doin' The Math: One Man's Opinion

By Ben Meisner

Wednesday, May 02, 2007 03:45 AM

        

A couple of things touched my funny bone this week at City Council.   In fact, there are some meetings where  I think there should be an admission charge.

Let me start off with a lesson in math from Glen “Moose” Scott.

Councilor Brian Skakun had asked Council to consider putting a third, two man patching crew, on for the season. That would bring the number of employees to six. Development Services Manager Bob Radloff, said boosting staff from 4 to 6 would mean a 50% increase in the number of holes filled.

Here’s the exchange:

Scott:  I’m not going to get into a mud slinging thing, I just want to ask over to Mr. Radloff a comment that he made got me very curious.  We’ve got two shifts on now that are working on filling potholes,  and he mentioned that if Councilor Skakun got his way and got $213 thousand dollars enhanced ,ah , out of the budget, ah, that would increase  it by 50%.  You’re only putting one more shift on, how are you going to increase it by 50%?

Radloff:  What I was saying was, we’re essentially having 50% more crew members out there on a given day applying pothole repair.

Scott:  Well, as I say your Worship, I’m not going to get into it.  Mr. Radloff’s just confused the issue, he didn’t answer my question, but anyways, we’re not going to debate it, let’s just get on with it.

It is safe to say that Councilor Scott’s strong suit is not math, but then on the other hand it is a tough math question now isn’t it? 

Now to the matter of “floating “a section of the old Cameron St. Bridge down to the railway museum, that idea offered by Joe Graber.

I thought seeing as how I had been up and down the Nechako a few times over the years , my reasoning was getting clouded so, I asked of a few other “boaters “, would they be prepared to hook onto a piece of the bridge floating down the current of the Nechako River? 

I got the “are you crazy look”. Now you could, I am sure, take the beams piece by piece down the river, but would it not make more sense to drive them around to the railway site?

Can any of you boaters imagine what it would take to stop a section of that bridge in mid current and get a hook onto it as it floated past?

The force of the current might dictate where the bridge was going to end up and if you don’t stop it there , you could easily end up with a few new,” little bridges”  at, Oh say , Red Rock Canyon , Quesnel , or even at Hells Gate .

Some times the funnies don’t come from Council members; they come from the gallery as well.

I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s opinion.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I wonder if any of the boaters ever manage to make it upriver with their motors?

Would any of the boaters ever make it upriver if their boat was disabled and they were towed upriver?

I wonder how the sternwheelers loaded with goods destined for PG ever made it upriver about 100 years ago?

http://wistechnology.com/article.php?id=445
There are only two crews of two persons per crew attempting to make *repairs* to the tens of thousands of cracks and potholes that are everywhere one hesitates to take one's vehicle to???

The City has over 700 employees, according to postings made here.

Why then are there only four workers assigned to the job?

No wonder some potholes never even get (im)properly repaired until next winter's snow mercifully covers them up again.

Well, Glen "Moose" Scott may not be a mathmatician, but you can certainly count on his credentials when it comes to animal care and training (as revealed in the circus debate).
I don't know this for sure, but wouldn't the Fish and Wildlife Ministry have a huge problem with "floating" a chemical ridden bridge down the river. As far as I am aware (again I could be wrong) you are not allowed to mess with a river when the fish are active which is basically anytime the river would be ice free. When are you going to be able to float it down?
Since it is such a foolish, dangerous, impractical and useless idea.....it will probably qualify for some provincial and federal funding.
only if you float it all the way to Stanley Park...
Has anyone ever heard of barges or pontoons where the bridge section would sit on, and one other neat invention - a boat and motor.
Besides, this is just a comment about how to get the bridge down to the railway museum, not the final plan.