Clear Full Forecast

Firearms Registry Has Failed in Its Primary Goals

By 250 News

Friday, July 06, 2007 04:00 AM

The Fraser Institute has released a study on the effectiveness of the long gun registry in Canada.

SFU Professor  and Senior Fellow with the Fraser Institute, Gary Mauser, is the author of the report   “Hubris in the North,  the  Canadian Firearms Registry” .  He concludes the  firearms registry  has failed in its primary  goals to  reduce  violent crime and suicide rates.

Mauser  points out that while  the number of crimes involving firearms and the number of  firearm related deaths have  decreased since the gun registry was implemented in 1998,  total criminal violence, and  suicide rates  remain “stubbornly stable.”

His report also shows how the total homicide rate has actually increased by 9% and gang related homicides have more than doubled between 1998 and 2005.

He reports that while the overall suicide rate slipped by 3% “an increase in suicides by hanging has nearly cancelled out the reduction in the number of suicides involving firearms.” 

Mauser says his research shows those who have motive, will find an alternate means “Motive is the key” says Mauser.   When asked if his report was then actually suggesting “Guns don’t kill, People do, ” he says his message really is, “Stop wasting time and money and do something that works.”

Mauser says at a cost of more than $2 billion dollars, the dollars could have been better spent on mental health programs, or keeping violent offenders behind bars, or improving probation or parole supervision. 

The SFU  prof has never owned a firearm, nor has he hunted, but  says as his reaserch on the issue progressed,  he came to believe the political reaction to  violent acts involving  firearms is disconnected from the real problem.   “When someone uses a firearm to commit crime, the obvious thing  is to attack the hunter in Northern British Columbia as being  the one to blame”.   There is also  a growing movement  within urban centres to ( as he refers to it) "demonize" gun owners.

“Clearly, the evidence shows that the registry has failed Canadians. It has failed to reduce gang violence or stop senseless killings. So why then, should we trust it, and why should we continue to fund it?”

He says while the basic tone of his paper is negative,  the positive side is that  it points to where dollars could be  better spent to effect change and reduce violent crime.

Mauser is hopeful   his report will open some eyes, but is also very realistic  “ Those who are paying attention are either already in the choir,  or they already hate you.”

    
Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

See how a zealous cop spent 200 hours (5 weeks) on a single Firearms application:

http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2001/2001bcsc579/2001bcsc579.html

Given only 65 days of training, how the hell can a cop make authoritative psyho-analyses?

And what about that cop?

http://www.lowe.ca/Rick/FirearmsLegislation/ReportMagazine.htm
Totally correct!
The Gun Registry is the biggest waste of money we have seen in many years.It is such a terrible waste, it is hard to find something to compare it to!
Absolutley useless.It should apply to handguns only even though that won't stop crime or killing.
The bad guy's don't register firearms.
Get rid of it!
And get rid of politicians who said they would work to defeat the legislation during the last election.
They have not done that, and need to called on it.
Were they lying or was it just a tool to get elected?
Some of us have not forgotten!
I wonder if Nathan Cullen is listening?
Getting rid of the gun registry was part of his election campain but he has waffled.
No suprise there I guess.
Silly me for believing!
They can't get rid of it until they get a majority. There are too many bleeding hearts in the Liberal and N.D.P. parties to let it pass. Wait until after the next election when they have a majority and it will be the first thing thrown out.
You are correct duffer but, in Cullens case,he stated that he would vote against more money for the gun registry during his election campain.
One of the first things he did in Ottawa was to vote in FAVOUR on a motion to give them MORE!
Hello?
I think he was noticeably absent for the next vote on the same issue.
That cost him my vote for next time and the votes of others as well and it will not be foregotten.
It did not go unnoticed.
To me that is no better than lying, and I don't really care WHY he did it.
But,hopefully you are right and the registry will be gone or severely modified with a majority.
Interesting that this local news site is the only one I can find carrying this story. I guess when the Liberals are wrong the MSM just ignores it.