Firearms Registry Has Failed in Its Primary Goals
By 250 News
The Fraser Institute has released a study on the effectiveness of the long gun registry in Canada.
SFU Professor and Senior Fellow with the Fraser Institute, Gary Mauser, is the author of the report “Hubris in the North, the Canadian Firearms Registry” . He concludes the firearms registry has failed in its primary goals to reduce violent crime and suicide rates.
Mauser points out that while the number of crimes involving firearms and the number of firearm related deaths have decreased since the gun registry was implemented in 1998, total criminal violence, and suicide rates remain “stubbornly stable.”
His report also shows how the total homicide rate has actually increased by 9% and gang related homicides have more than doubled between 1998 and 2005.
He reports that while the overall suicide rate slipped by 3% “an increase in suicides by hanging has nearly cancelled out the reduction in the number of suicides involving firearms.”
Mauser says his research shows those who have motive, will find an alternate means “Motive is the key” says Mauser. When asked if his report was then actually suggesting “Guns don’t kill, People do, ” he says his message really is, “Stop wasting time and money and do something that works.”
Mauser says at a cost of more than $2 billion dollars, the dollars could have been better spent on mental health programs, or keeping violent offenders behind bars, or improving probation or parole supervision.
The SFU prof has never owned a firearm, nor has he hunted, but says as his reaserch on the issue progressed, he came to believe the political reaction to violent acts involving firearms is disconnected from the real problem. “When someone uses a firearm to commit crime, the obvious thing is to attack the hunter in Northern British Columbia as being the one to blame”. There is also a growing movement within urban centres to ( as he refers to it) "demonize" gun owners.
“Clearly, the evidence shows that the registry has failed Canadians. It has failed to reduce gang violence or stop senseless killings. So why then, should we trust it, and why should we continue to fund it?”
He says while the basic tone of his paper is negative, the positive side is that it points to where dollars could be better spent to effect change and reduce violent crime.
Mauser is hopeful his report will open some eyes, but is also very realistic “ Those who are paying attention are either already in the choir, or they already hate you.”
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2001/2001bcsc579/2001bcsc579.html
Given only 65 days of training, how the hell can a cop make authoritative psyho-analyses?
And what about that cop?
http://www.lowe.ca/Rick/FirearmsLegislation/ReportMagazine.htm