Clear Full Forecast

CN Gets Orders in Wake of Prince George Derailment

By 250 News

Tuesday, August 07, 2007 02:52 PM

Officials from Environment Canada, and Transport Canada watch as  CN  train burns on  opposite side of Fraser River Saturday  (photo  courtesy Moira Neal MPA F/PPABC)

In the wake of Saturday’s collision of two CN trains in Prince George, Transport Canada has sent a notice and order to CN Rail setting out five areas which need immediate action.

Transport Canada says it had a Dangerous Goods Transportation Inspector, and  a Rail Safety Inspector on the scene of the crash and they have  written the following orders:

1.  Train movement will not be protected by the “point protection “ zone, and any existing instructions related to the “point potection” zone ( P.P.Zone) are null and void.   (The inspectors believe this zone, which was to control train traffic, gave operators a false sense of security that  there was only one train in the zone at any given time.)

2.  An employee must physically  be on a leading end of equipment to view the track at all times to avoid possible conflicts when switching. (Opinion250 has been told the trains were being operated by "remote control")

3.  The maximum cars to be handled is 30 loads, or 40 cars, but if  40, at least 10 have to be empty.  (CN has confirmed there were3 locomotives and 53 cars on the northbound train,  while the southbound train had two locomotives and 67 cars)

4.  There has to be a sufficient number of cars with operating air brakes to control movement

5.  All data related to the braking performance, inspection  repairs and yard engines assigned to switching duties, must be retained for 30 days.

Canada Rail Safety will monitor to ensure the conditions are met.

CN has received the order, and has taken immediate action to comply.

    


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

So, that is that,
now we wait for the big one....
typical...
big shots get away with murder, almost.
Prince George narrowly avoids becoming obliterated and C.N. continues on its merry way. No ramifications just go back to business as usual. Still no word from local M.L.A.'s or C.N.Kinsley. Not surprising but very discouraging. How long will it be before we are here again discussing C.N.'s latest disaster? Anyone willing to take bets not on if but when? We seem to understand the dangers where are our leaders?
Leaders?? Is that a new word for elected people?
How about just enforcing the rules that are already in place? Special interest groups can shut down a railway faster than Environment Canada or Transport Canada. Take some lessons. :Chester
Rule/order number 4 is interesting....I would think that ALL cars should have working brakes??
Cars and trucks are supposed to have working brakes on all wheels...why are railroad cars different?
"An employee must physically be on a leading end of equipment to view the track at all times TO AVOID POSSIBLE CONFLICTS WHEN SWITCHING."

So, it appears that was the cause. There is a switch at that location and only that location for some distance. It was a switching problem. ANyone who would have been sitting at a board somehwere should have had the information of train locations and the switch setting, and have had control of the switch setting.

Without at least that amount of information, how could anyone possibly be authorized to operate a train remotely?
I am pleased to see these 'orders' being 'implemented' so quickly. Hopefully this helps CNs woes.
And to think, someone actually has to be on these huge, expensive pieces of equipment from now on as they roll through railway crossings, switchs, etc. with millions of dollars of goods attached to them. Thank heaven.
So will we be better prepared for the next CN accident? Why doesn't P.G., a city with 2 rivers running thru it, have a fire-fighting boat? And why was the fire left to burn out? Less to clean up for CN? I don't think our "air quality" needed that.