Clear Full Forecast

Report From Paliament's Hill : August 9th

By Prince George - Peace River M.P. Jay Hill

Thursday, August 09, 2007 03:45 AM


What is Pension Income Splitting?

Since taking office, our Conservative Government has delivered unprecedented tax relief to seniors.


We doubled the pension income credit to $2,000 and increased the age credit amount by $1,000.  These measures alone removed tens of thousands of seniors from the tax rolls.  In other investments, we expanded the New Horizons for Seniors program by $10-million each year to expand capital assistance (community buildings, equipment and furnishings) related to seniors services and to combat elder abuse and fraud.


Yet the single most popular tax measure for seniors that we’ve introduced is pension income splitting.  Based upon the number of calls to my office asking for clarification, I thought it would be helpful to provide some basic details below:

What is pension income splitting?

Canadian residents will be able to allocate up to one-half of their income that qualifies for the existing pension income tax credit to their spouse (or common-law partner) for income tax purposes.
The amount allocated is deducted from the net income of the person who received the pension income, and is included in the net income of their spouse or common-law partner.

Who qualifies?

A pension recipient (pensioner) and his or her spouse or common-law partner can split the pensioner's “eligible pension income” if they are married or in a common-law partnership with each other in the tax year and are not, because of a breakdown in their marriage or partnership, living separately at the end of the year and for a period of 90 days at the beginning of the year.  They must also reside in Canada on December 31st; or, if deceased, had resided in Canada on the date of death. 

What is “eligible pension income”?

Eligible pension income is:
* the taxable part of annuity payments from a superannuation or pension fund or plan; and
* if received as a result of the death of a spouse or common-law partner, or if the pensioner is age 65 or older at the end of the year, annuity and registered retirement income fund (including life income fund) payments; and registered Retirement Savings Plan annuity payments.
Please note that Old Age Security and Canada Pension Plan payments do not qualify.
How do you indicate your wish to split eligible pension income?
Pension splitting affects the tax payable for both persons, so they must both agree to the allocation for the year in question by completing Form T1032, Joint Election to Split Pension Income (available January 2008). Your 2007 income tax return will include new lines for the pensioner to deduct the allocated pension amount and for spouses to report it.

Does pension splitting affect other tax credits?

The GST credit, Child Care Tax Benefit and related provincial benefits will not change as they’re based upon the net incomes of both spouses.  However, pension splitting will affect any tax credits and benefits calculated using one individual's net income, such as the age amount, the spouse or common-law partner amount, and the repayment of Old Age Security benefits.

For more detailed information, please consult the Canada Revenue Agency website at:  www.cra.gc.ca or call my office at 1-800-661-1183.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Hey Jay - any chance of helping out single income families by income splitting across the board?

Thanks.
I'll second Parrotheads comments.
Anyone notice that Canada has the lowest amount of paid holiday's in the entire industrialized world.

Less then half the paid holiday days of European countries like Austia, France, Poland, Estonia, and even Israel.

http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2007/work.life.balance/chart/
IMO income tax cuts should coincide with increased stat holidays and a raise of manidory holiday pay of 6% from 4%.
Actually the USA has the lowest number of paid holidays. They have no law requiring it, thus it is 0 days. But then this is on CNN, so I guess they did not want the USA to look conspicuous with 0 in there. They left that spot for China when really the USA should have been in there as well.

It states that the figures are statutory paid vacation after 10 years of work. Then it lists 15 days in the USA and provides a note why it is exempted from the apples to apples comparison.

If one used the same system for Canada, we should probably have anywhere between 15 to 20 days, since the typical guideline used by unions and most “progressive” companies is accumulated at a rate of one day per year to a maximum limit of say 4 or 5 weeks.

The problem is, that does not get carried forward to the next employer when one changes employer. The only chance one has is to negotiate the paid vacation time if you are not union.

In Germany, for instance, the paid vacation is tied to age. It is not employer related. It has been that way for at least half a century.

Wanna decrease unemployment? Get with the times and provide more paid vacation. Wanna decrease productivity? Provide more paid vacation.

Now, let's look at the average work week and you might find the same trend, lower number of hours/week in other countries.

And then there is this recent article about other paid leaves:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16907584
http://www.canadaone.com/ezine/july07/inoutvacation.html

One more piece of the puzzle of trying to compare apples to apples.

As in the USA, the employment laws actaully sit with the state, not the feds. So, if one wer to look at Canada it would be the same. As far as I know, there is no federal law. So they took Ontario as the example.

Problem is, other along with PEI and the Yukon, Ontario is the exception. The exception is less than 50% of the population in Canada. It seems that the predominate legislation actually is for 3 weeks after 10 years, with Saskatchewan having 4 weeks.

So much for researchers!!!