Clear Full Forecast

Nechako Sockeye Taking the Biggest Hit: One Man's Opinion

By Ben Meisner

Friday, August 10, 2007 03:46 AM

        

A few weeks ago former Socred Government Environment Minister, Bruce Strachan, was preaching the idea that in fact the agreement he signed in 1987 led to a renewed salmon stock along the Nechako River.

It was Strachan who signed off the Kemano 2 project for the provincial government and suggested at the time that the completion project posed, "an acceptable level of certainty”.

Given the latest information on how the fishery is going, it is hard to understand how Strachan can continue to preach that acceptable level of certainty, but then that is common practice for a politician. He likes to use the Chinook salmon on the Nechako, which, according to him, have shown an increase in numbers. It also may have slipped his mind that when Alcan began using a different method of counting the fish, to no ones surprise, the numbers suddenly went up.

Michael Lapointe, the chief biologist with the Pacific Salmon Commission paints quite a different picture and I would be  inclined to listen to him speak before I listen to  Strachan.

Lapointe says that the Stellako and Stewart Sockeye fisheries continue to drop at an alarming rate every single year. Now there could be a host of different reasons for this such as climate, we do know for example that the Fraser lies at the southern end of the sockeye habitat. But the runs in other rivers along the Fraser have not taken the same hit as those that feed into the Nechako. That is a fact that cannot be disputed.

So you now have a common denominator. Under the agreement that was signed by Strachan, Alcan is only obligated to ensure a certain temperature is maintained in the Nechako to a point above Finmore, less than half the distance of the Nechako River.

So do we have a problem here? Consider this, the Stellako and Stewart fishery in days gone by was worth about $70 million dollars a year. Take that out of the pocket of the people of the province and it does have an affect.

There may be a number of reasons for this years poor Sockeye run on the Fraser, the problem on the Nechako system is much, much larger.

I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s opinion.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Could it be that the Sockeye are being overfished by the Native fishery in the Stellako and Stuart runs? I think this is a definite possibility. Mr. Meisner should consider this in his research.
I'd like to hear Strachans take on this.
Could it be that EVERYONE is to blame? Could it be that when you have a money worshipping culture the health of the people and nature comes in at a distant second and third? Could it be that the recent historical paradigm of money worship is the true evil and most all are willingly on their knee's serving it? Could it be that death - money and the things it buys - is far more important to this species than life?

We are faced with the biggest choice in human history: Are we going to serve death through the worship of money, or are we going to serve life? The choice is yours....

Capitalism = Cancer. They operate on exactly the same principle.


Capitalism does not equal cancer.

Monopolistic multinational capitalism you could argue does equal cancer, which is what we have in North America, but true capitalism is the most efficient form of economic distribution available in its purest form.

True capitalism would not involve fake money through fractional banking and usury, but rather the principle of equity ownership of stakeholders that use real profits as their benchmark and not goodwill paper profits. We the little guys practice real capitalism, meanwhile we get clobbered by the monopolist capitalism practiced by our political organizations and their handlers in the multinational monopolistic elite of which Alcan sits at the top.

If real capitalism with real profits accounted for by all stakeholders was the rule of the day, then Alcan would have a far different situation in regards to the Nechako basin.

It is like the double negative in a way where the multinational elite use capitalism as a vehicle to implement something entirely different then the principles of capitalism that looks more like (socialism-fascism) elitism IMO.
Do you think that an increased demand from the white man buying salmon from the Natives might have a bearing on the fish count?

The whole system of who can fish and who can't is a lark. Let's call a spade a spade. Chester
Isn't it just amazing that there are only two kinds of people in this area of the world: The white man and the Native!

If a person of latino, east indian or chinese or other ethnicity buys a salmon from a Native - does that make it o.k.?